In a political debate you feel like the other side just doesn’t get your point of view, and if they could only see things with your clarity, they would understand and fall naturally in line with what you believe. They must not understand, because if they did they wouldn’t think the things they think. By contrast, you believe you totally get their point of view and you reject it. You see it in all its detail and understand it for what it is – stupid. You don’t need to hear them elaborate. So, each side believes they understand the other side better than the other side understands both their opponents and themselves.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Friday, August 26, 2011
The Illusion of Asymmetric Insight
The idea of this very long post is that we know we ourselves are full of mysteries, while we know we pretty well understand other people. Rings true to me. Apparently the blogger has a book coming out and is using the blog to stir interest. He succeeded with me. An excerpt:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment