I have a Google Alert set up for "black farmers", dating back to the Pigford days. Today it showed two hits:
"National Black Farmers Association Announces Boycott of John Deere"
"Deere forms new coalition to assist Black farmers with property rights"
No text for either, so I'm left guessing at the story behind the scenes.
I'll take this opportunity to note that the NBFA (headed by John Boyd) has seemed to be a lot more active in recent months than they were for a while.
Noah Smith has a piece in Bloomberg, describing the 1970's rise in oil prices and attributing several structural changes in the economy to that cause. This shows gas prices over the last 100 years. In 1968 when I first began driving as a civilian prices were $.34 a gallon. Sometimes you had gas price wars, which would drive the prices even lower. Stations might offer premiums, like steak knives, for filling a tank. (Back in the day, banks used to offer premiums to open savings accounts, since interest rates were capped--but that's another subject.) We're still using a couple knives I got back then.
By 1980 the prices had risen to $1.19--tripling in price. That's after embargoes and long gas lines as people panicked (rather like the toilet paper shortages this spring).
NYTimes has a piece tied to GAO's assessment of MFP in a report Monday. The criticisms seem to focus on higher payments for Southern producers and for big producers.
I'd note that the WTO just issued an opinion that Trump's tariffs on China were illegal. MFP was intended to counter the adverse effects of the Chinese tariffs which responded to Trump's tariffs.
There's some worrying that liberals would not accept another Trump victory. I can only speak for myself, a diehard Democrat.
If a "Trump victory" means an outcome like 2016--a loss in the popular vote but a clear plurality in one or more states sufficient to mean an electoral college victory--yes, I'll "accept" it. By which I mean I'll recognize him as the person elected to be president according to our constitution. It doesn't mean I won't be as active, or more active, in opposition as I have been.
If the election goes to Congress, I'm not giving a promise of acceptance, although to the extent I understand the 1876 resolution I'd likely acceptance such an outcome in 2020.
I've used the idea of a "last mile" problem before, but didn't really describe it. The "last mile" in the internet is linking a home to the internet. It's relatively easy to run fiber cable around the land. It's like our blood--the veins and arteries are easy, but the capillaries are where it gets complicated. In my mind the American federal government has such a problem--it can't connect reliably with all its citizens in all aspects of society.
I just noticed another instance: Treasury Department has 9 million checks it hasn't gotten to citizens.
The problem is more than 9 million--these are people who are part of the economy--IRS knows who they are, as opposed to people who are "off the grid" entitely.
Reading Robert Gates: Exercise of Power, American Failures, Success, and a New Path Forward in the Post-Cold War World.
This Post review is pretty good. Gates applauds Nixon and Reagan as having foreign policy agendas on entering office, and working effectively to implement them. He likes George HW Bush's response to the end of the Cold War, but criticizes Carter, Clinton, Obama, and Trump. He offers overviews of our history in dealing with various foreign affairs issues over the last 50 years, during much of which he was either at CIA, NSC, or DOD. Then he offers suggestions for better management.
His three big things are:
Watched the older Ben Affleck movie, "The Town", last night. A few subtle reminders of the group/ethnic tensions which were once a big feature of Boston life.
Tribalism is everywhere humans are.
9/11 is a good day to remember that.
Federal Computer Week has a long discussion of the challenges records management faces in the current environment:“I love my records management staff,” one said. “They’re fantastic. But they are not database people. They are not technologists.”
I think the bottom line is that "records management" is not a sexy occupation, which means it can descend into a vicious circle: because it's not sexy it doesn't attract the best employees or employees who have experience in new processes and technology, management can ignore it for more crucial issues, employees can ignore records management problems and fail to understand the logic of the rules, and records management issues are ignored in developing new systems. Back in the day, my early days at ASCS, our business processes were pretty much standard across the country: electric typewriters and carbon paper, and information moved on mail carts and clearance folders. No more.
That explains both Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server as well as various figures in the White House under the current administration.
As I understand it, the Fairfax school system had problems with remote learning back in the spring for two reasons--using older software (Blackboard, I believe) and running it on their own server instead of in the cloud. The outcome was initially a fiasco, as the system couldn't handle the big load.
This problem, and my experience, suggests that the educators advising the Fairfax County School Board weren't paying enough attention to their infrastructure, likely because they regarded it as a distraction from the real job of educating students and running the system.
As I used to say: "maintenance has no sex appeal".
