Watched the older Ben Affleck movie, "The Town", last night. A few subtle reminders of the group/ethnic tensions which were once a big feature of Boston life.
Tribalism is everywhere humans are.
9/11 is a good day to remember that.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Watched the older Ben Affleck movie, "The Town", last night. A few subtle reminders of the group/ethnic tensions which were once a big feature of Boston life.
Tribalism is everywhere humans are.
9/11 is a good day to remember that.
Federal Computer Week has a long discussion of the challenges records management faces in the current environment:“I love my records management staff,” one said. “They’re fantastic. But they are not database people. They are not technologists.”
I think the bottom line is that "records management" is not a sexy occupation, which means it can descend into a vicious circle: because it's not sexy it doesn't attract the best employees or employees who have experience in new processes and technology, management can ignore it for more crucial issues, employees can ignore records management problems and fail to understand the logic of the rules, and records management issues are ignored in developing new systems. Back in the day, my early days at ASCS, our business processes were pretty much standard across the country: electric typewriters and carbon paper, and information moved on mail carts and clearance folders. No more.
That explains both Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server as well as various figures in the White House under the current administration.
As I understand it, the Fairfax school system had problems with remote learning back in the spring for two reasons--using older software (Blackboard, I believe) and running it on their own server instead of in the cloud. The outcome was initially a fiasco, as the system couldn't handle the big load.
This problem, and my experience, suggests that the educators advising the Fairfax County School Board weren't paying enough attention to their infrastructure, likely because they regarded it as a distraction from the real job of educating students and running the system.
As I used to say: "maintenance has no sex appeal".
I'm guessing maybe vertical farming has an advantage I've not considered in the past. I've mostly been skeptical of it and still am. But...
One of the problems of growing produce is labor. While farm labor isn't well paid, the harvesting of vegetables typically requires hand labor, which I think usually turns into seasonal labor (depending on the crop). But I saw the other day a picture of a worker in a vertical farm growing lettuce. He was wearing a white uniform, and standing by a tray of lettuce at shoulder height. I don't know whether it's standard for vertical farms to have their growing trays on a rotating drive arrangement, so that the work is always at eye level, but it makes sense they would. It's a slight additional expense and a complication for maintenance but still.
So consider the labor advantages of such a system:
Megan McArdle and this Post analysis both describe a booming real estate market in the suburbs, as the "professional" (AKA "upper middle class") take advantage of cheap money and flee the crowded cities. I can see that in my own neighborhood: in the last year or so there have been several townhouses change hands in my cluster. These would likely be entry-level houses, currently selling in the $350K range. By the old standards of 2.5 times yearly income that means household income of $140K--not likely. A two income family would, I'd assume, come close to $90-100 K (say two school teachers)
IMO the country needs some way to counter such trends. We don't need McMansions, we don't need everyone having their own private bathroom, we don't need 2.4 rooms per person, 2,700 square feet in a house, much less more than that. I write this knowing my wife and I occupy a house with 2 baths, 2 half baths. But it's less than 1500 square feet. I didn't need that big of a house when I bought; we don't use the whole house now.
When I bought I found the biggest house I thought I could afford because I figured it was a good investment. I assume that parents would buy the biggest house they can afford in the best school district they can find for similar reasons: their kids are good investments; their house is a good investment, or so they think.
The only current way of countering ever more investment in housing is real estate taxes.
Our illustrious president is alleged to have called people who served in the military "losers", etc. It seems consistent with his public persona, although the Atlantic article didn't have named sources.
In reaction, some are calling military personnel "heroes".
I take exception: I'm a vet, but no damned hero. I was drafted, I went, I served, I got out very happily--end of story for me.
USDA's DC area offices are working towards reopening, but catching flak from the employees according to this report.
Been a long time since I posted on this subject. Here's a recent release--the study is critical of the EU programs:
The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the EU's largest budget item, averaging EUR 54 billion annually. It is well known that over 80% of payments are going to only 20% of farmers, but to what extent these payments support policy goals is poorly understood, due to a lack of transparency and complex reporting.
"Our analysis shows that at least €24 billion per year goes to income support in the richest regions, while the poorest regions with the most farm jobs are being left further behind.
James Rebanks had a best-selling book back in 2015--The Shepherd's Life, a memoir of raising sheep in northwestern England. More recently, as described in his Twitter account, he's diversified his operation with pigs and cows, and put more emphasis on diversified farming and conservation. And he has a new book, English Pastoral (currently only on sale in England).
It took me a little while, but my new book is now on sale (for pre orders)
— James Rebanks (@herdyshepherd1) May 28, 2020
It is about everything I care about and love and I hope you like it pic.twitter.com/kpg2u7JmZH
This week BBC America had a clip of him and his wife as they argued against the "American System" Their concern was the negotiations between the UK government and US over trade terms, as the UK leaves the EU. If there are no trade barriers/tariffs on agricultural trade, they fear that UK agriculture will be overwhelmed. (I sense a reprise of the repeal of the Corn Laws back in 1846.)
Rebanks outlines the case for a protectionist stance towards agriculture in this March article. And it's based on his book tour (NYTimes piece) of Kentucky when selling his first book.
I sometimes wonder. It's too bad we didn't have blogs in the 60's and 70's so I could trace the changes in my opinions over the years. As far as today's politicians go, I generally support the Klobuchars and Bidens of the world.
I likely am more internationalist/globalist than they. I remember the heyday of the UN, when it was still viewed by some as essential to world peace. And I remember the decolonialization movement and our concern over getting adequate foreign aid to the third world. Liberals mostly seem to have abandoned that focus, but the influence of my ancestral religion still runs strong--the "Great Mission" was to convert the world.
On some current issues: