- my memory is in the 40's-60's white middle and upper class Americans adhered quite tightly to a certain set of social norms, and as a counterpoint, we looked askance at those who didn't fit that description, either not being white middle class or not adhering to the norms.
- over the next years that changed, partly the norms changed, partly the tolerance for non-conformity broadened.
- more recently we've become more concerned about non-adherence to the norms, less tolerant of the less tolerant among the white middle and upper classes, still tolerant of those excluded from that universe.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Thursday, May 02, 2019
Changing Standards: Tight Versus Loose
I think I've mentioned this book before. It ties into my post of yesterday. My memory is the writer believes there can be systematic differences in how tightly or loosely societies adhere to social norms. To apply it to our history:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment