What I, as an old FSA bureaucrat, am wondering is:
- when will FSA issue a directive, presumably a notice, on the MFP?
- when will the regulations (presumably an interim final reg) be published by the Office of the Federal Register. Note: I typed the previous sentence, then did a search on the OFR site. The regulation was filed with OFR this morning. It has this notation: "This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/30/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-18842, and on govinfo.gov"
- when will the signup form(s) be available? They have to be cleared by OMB.
Some comments on the regulations, written as I scan it.
- USDA OGC and OMB have come up with a dodge which is new to me--a "Notice of Funds Availability". I've not seen such a document before, but Googling shows it's been used by other departments. My guess is the lawyers approved (lawyers can approve anything if the pressure is on) this as a measure to work around existing rules in the Administrative Procedure Act and Trump's EEO--I'd bet a fair amount that NOFA's aren't considered "regulations" for those purposes. Note: There's some logic to the step--the "regulations" which get conservatives upset usually shape behavior: OSHA and EPA type regs. The regulations for farm program payments used to be considered "regulations", but no body was forced to take the payments--the regulations were really the conditions for receiving the payment.
- I'm waiting with bated breath to see whether the applications for payment get OMB clearance. Seems to me they have to, but the MFP regs say the form will be specified in the NOFA.
- Turns out OMB has a category of "transfer rules" which are not covered by the two for one Trump rule (doing away with two old regulations for each new regulation). That dates back to April 2017.
- I see one glitch here: "The title and number of the Federal Domestic Assistance Program found in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance to which this rule applies is TBD – Market Facilitation Program and number". The number wasn't assigned.
- I think it's fair to assume that eligibility and payments are on a farm basis, rather than an operator.
I never was an expert on the price support side of FSA; they are the people who dealt with production evidence. With that said, where could a dishonest producer game the program? The incentive for fraud would be to exaggerate one's production, by duplicating evidence to multiple county offices, forging evidence, or having different producers claiming ownership of the same production. FSA has long experience with production evidence, so existing validation checks and spotchecks will likely work. However, as a cynic, I'm sure a few farmers will try to get more than they should.
No comments:
Post a Comment