Here's an assessment of the impact of growing organic cotton in India. It seems the result is not higher yields (no surprise) but the benefits which are less tangible. I note the support from a number of NGO's and the psychic rewards of being involved in something of a crusade, or at least a good cause, rather than just grubbing for the added dollar.
A cynic would believe that those who chase the monetary rewards will, in the long run, win out.
I blogged previously about David Kilcullen's book. Not done yet.
Interesting discussion of the Russia military, particularly in light of their performance in the Ukraine. One striking bit is the idea of "escalate to descalate"--fast, aggressive strikes to establish a position where resistance is unlikely.
One example was the Georgian war. It seems as if the original Russian plan for Ukraine 2022 was the same--a fast strike to decapitate Ukrainian leadership, take Kyviv before NATO could respond. There's also the possible use of nuclear weapons--small nukes (300 ton TNT equivalent)--use them early betting that retaliation will be hindered by the need for an alliance to coordinate.
Kilcullen describes the evolution of the Russian military since the breakup of the Soviet Union, but might have been surprised that the reforms haven't been as effective in Ukraine as they were thought to be.
NYTimes recently ran an article, seeming to show that because of their political clout, Hasidic schools spend most of their time on religious subjects, slighting the basics, which mean their students, particularly boys, do not pass state exams. The article has led to a lot of discussion.
When you have a diverse society, we have a problem in drawing lines. Over my life the society has often backed off an original decision: no facial hair for military, no afros, no turbans for Sikhs, etc. The Amish do schooling up through 8th grade only, and don't participate in Social Security. There's no problem with the hijab and the burka, the sari and the whatever, though low-slung jeans that show underwear are, or were, controversial.
There's always been controversies over books in school, not to mention the behavior of teachers. No pregnant teachers in the past, no beards, etc. We once wanted books which embodied the Protestant version of Christianity. I don't remember whether, when we said the Lord's Prayer every morning in my school, whether we said "debts" or "trespasses".
There's always tension between the authority/teachings of the professional teacher and the authority/teachings of the parents (and these days, between parents who are separated or divorced).
I wonder how nations who are more diverse than the US, such as India or Indonesia, handle the lines. I doubt we'll ever get consensus on the lines.
They killed the last two American troops who were attacked from the air (towards the end of the Korean war.)
That factoid from David Kilcullen's The Dragons and the Snakes: How the Rest Learned to Fight the West. I'm about 100 pages in, finding it interesting and convincing. So far he's using an ecological/evolutionary approach to the recent history (say from 1991 on) of war, and the changes in how the opposing parties have changed their tactics and strategies, mostly learning from defeats.
One observation is that NSA can gather much more data than they can analyze. Terrorist/insurgent organizations don't rely on privacy laws, but on hiding in the woods of all the other data. I think that also applies to the average citizen--we get lost in the mass of data, so we don't need to be paranoid.
Ran into a projection of occupantions predicted to lose jobs over the next 10 years. Don't have the link. As I recall, data entry types, secretaries, and (personal/executive) assistants were big losers.
My guess is that's continuing a trend as the impact of computing and the internet affects office work. As we develop systems online more of the data entry is outsourced to the user, the customers. Even IRS may be moving in that direction. And the secretary/assistant category likely reflects moving work from "auxiliaries" to their "principals", both a move from formal communications (letters with multiple copies) to informal (email and texts with electronic copies) and the increased capabilities of software. Bottom line: people believe it's faster and more efficient to do their own email than to have an auxiliary do it; easier to arrange their own travel; easier to be available for texts and calls on cellphones with software tools for screening than to rely on human screeners.
There might also be a decline in the value of "servants" (which after all is what secretaries and assistants are) in signalling status. We don't notice it, but I think there may be a decline in the number of chauffeurs, butlers, chefs the rich have these days, at least compared to the very rich. There may be an exception for entertainers, like athletes and movie stars. The premium on the physical, both fitness and appearance, means it's worth paying for personal trainers, hairdressers, etc.
I always found Dan Drezner interesting to follow, on twitter, blogging, and in the Post. Now he's moved to Substack and is trying to drum up readership.
He offered three contrarian positions for consideration as possibly attracting interest.
Here's my comments:
Trump voters? May not be that interesting. Remember the yellow dog Democrats? We have rattlesnake Republicans, people who've always voted Republican and will continue to do so. I grew up in upstate NY where if you wanted a choice, you voted in the Republican primary. It took Goldwater's candidacy to break the hold, at least for a while.
Globalization? I'm too old to change from being a free trader. We don't yet know how to have a good safety net for those displaced by it, but I was one of the liberals in the 60's and 70's who opposed Ike's "trade, not aid" (IIRC). Turns out he was righter than we thought. I can't get past the changes in what we called the Third World.. Anti-globalism is just an example of the thermostatic effect on a world scale.
Pandemic northingburger? That's too obvious to be interesting, at least when confined to IR. Sociologically, a different story.
NYTimes newsletter from Nate Cohn discussing election polls, also whether the Clinton indictment was a possible parallel to the impact of Dobbs on the campaign.
In comments there I suggested that Sputnik was in some ways comparable--a surprise event, raising the importance of a new issue, close enough to impact the 1958 elections in which Dems did very well --48 House and 15 Senate.
It helped that there was a recession in 58 and Ike was in his second term. It set the stage for JFK's pledge to get the nation moving and for the (false) concerns about "missile gap."
Fairfax has recently banned plastic shopping bags. I've seen calculations of how many times you'd have to use a durable shopping bag of different types to balance the impact of plastic bags on the ecology. What the calculations miss is the cost of collecting bags from the landscape, and the seascape. which must easily make the durable bags worthwhile. Bottom line: you have to calculate the cleanup costs to have an accurate picture.
When in trouble or in doubt
Run in circles scream and shout.
Herman Wouk--Caine Mutiny
(My memory is Wouk made it seem like a quotation, but it seems it was original with him.)
For Politicians:
When in trouble or in doubt
Spend money any amount.
