Sometimes it's amazing how stupid, or not exactly stupid but unaware, I've been.
I discovered yesterday that I comb my hair with my left hand. That's surprising because I write right-handed and do everything else right-handed, although I have retrained to use my left hand to mouse when I developed carpal tunnel in the right. The retraining took a while, but I got it done.
Partly this is triggered by a tweet replying to L.D.Burnett's tweet about typing, when I recalled how muscle memory kicked in towards the end of my half-year typing class in HS and suddenly I was typing 45-50 wpm instead of 10.
It now makes sense of a childhood memory of adults conferring over my head on which side of my head the part should be. Someone, I forget who, perhaps a barber or my father quoting a barber, saying to leave me to discover which way felt natural to me. Somehow I did, though it still seems a little strange to see a photo where my hair is parted differently than the mirror shows.
Friday, December 07, 2018
Thursday, December 06, 2018
Movie Review: Green Book
The movie has attracted some flak in the media, but my wife and I enjoyed it.
In a way it reminded me of movies like "Pretty Baby Woman [Freudian slip]"--the standard plot about people with different personalities who change each other, especially the one where with the romantic stereotypes of the spontaneous, earthy, joi de vivre type gets the uptight person to seize the day
The movie does that plot well. It's relieved from being too corny because in this movie the black character is the WASP buttoned up one and the white character is his opposite. To me that dynamic is more important to the movie than the racial issues--the prejudices of the 1960's and the segregation in the South--though it's the racial aspects which seem to attract media attention.
And the acting is great--we've liked Mortensen from past performances, ever since Witness and then LOR. Despite the 50 pounds he may have added for the role, and the weight he may have added doing all the eating in the script, he still comes across as capable and intelligent. And the only thing wrong with Ali is I can't spell his last name.
It hasn't been doing well at the box office, but it just picked up five Golden Globe nominations for the movie and its actors.
In a way it reminded me of movies like "Pretty
The movie does that plot well. It's relieved from being too corny because in this movie the black character is the WASP buttoned up one and the white character is his opposite. To me that dynamic is more important to the movie than the racial issues--the prejudices of the 1960's and the segregation in the South--though it's the racial aspects which seem to attract media attention.
And the acting is great--we've liked Mortensen from past performances, ever since Witness and then LOR. Despite the 50 pounds he may have added for the role, and the weight he may have added doing all the eating in the script, he still comes across as capable and intelligent. And the only thing wrong with Ali is I can't spell his last name.
It hasn't been doing well at the box office, but it just picked up five Golden Globe nominations for the movie and its actors.
Wednesday, December 05, 2018
My Thoughts on the "Greatest Generation"
A reply to a Wendell Pierce tweet:
"
As you can tell, I'm ambivalent, as usual, particularly about making moral judgments on the past. We're all stuck with the history we inherit. The best we can expect of anyone, whether individual, generation, or nation, is to do better than their predecessors.
As the media reflects on the passing of the Greatest Generation, they should remember that generation was flawed. It allowed segregation &watched Americans kill others trying to exercise their right to vote.Greatness was their ability to change & live up to their professed values
"
Flawed, as every generation is flawed: failing to fully correct evils they knew of, and failing to recognize clearly evils their descendants see all too clearly.
As you can tell, I'm ambivalent, as usual, particularly about making moral judgments on the past. We're all stuck with the history we inherit. The best we can expect of anyone, whether individual, generation, or nation, is to do better than their predecessors.
Tuesday, December 04, 2018
Nieces and Nephews in Farming?
AEI notes the House Ag chair is pushing to allow nieces and nephews to be "persons' for payment limitation purposes:
"In the midst of this week’s negotiations over the farm bill, House Committee on Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway (R-TX) is pushing to remove any limits on subsidy payments to farms through what has become known as his “nieces and nephews” provision. This provision would increase the number of people eligible to receive up to $125,000 in subsidy payments under one of two major income transfer programs, whether the people in question really participate in the farm business or not.* * *Currently, only two people per each farm business can be eligible for these programs — called Price Loss Coverage and Agricultural Risk Coverage — capping total payments to a farm business to $250,000. However, the “nephews and nieces” provision proposed by the current chair of the House Committee on Agriculture would substantially increase the number of people eligible for a payment. For example, an agribusiness owner with four “nieces and nephews” described as “actively engaged in farming,” because they participate in an annual earning’s conference call, would be allowed to classify those four people as “actively engaged” because of that call. The owners would then be able to increase the subsidy paid to the farm business up to a limit of $1.5 million a year.
Monday, December 03, 2018
Did the Elite Used To Believe in Service?
The current assessments of George H.W. Bush's life often include a statement to the effect that in the past the elite, as exemplified by Bush,, used to believe in service to the nation, in noblesse oblige. Such statements seem to be accepted unthinkingly, without question.
I'm not so sure there's that much difference between now and the past. When you look at the business elite, the big shots with the big bucks, there seems to be a mixture of plutocracy and service. For every Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundation created decades ago you can match similar efforts by Gates and Buffett.
Charlie Wilson famously said what's good for the U.S. is good for General Motors, and vice versa. Our current elite knows better to say that, but I suspect they think it. Wilson headed DOD under Ike. Trump has had his own set of rich men, members of the elite albeit rather second level, serving in his administration.
My bottom line is that there's always been a mixture of motivations for public service: some people want new fields to explore (think Sen. Corker), some people want a career in politics moving in and out of government depending on which party is in control, some just fall into it.
[Update: Erik Loomis at Lawyers, Guns, & Money visits the grave of Joseph Choate, touching on some of the good and bad aspects of the old-time elite beliefs. Choate's brother founded the Choate private school, now Choate-Rosemary Hall, attended by many elite, including JFK. ]
I'm not so sure there's that much difference between now and the past. When you look at the business elite, the big shots with the big bucks, there seems to be a mixture of plutocracy and service. For every Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundation created decades ago you can match similar efforts by Gates and Buffett.
Charlie Wilson famously said what's good for the U.S. is good for General Motors, and vice versa. Our current elite knows better to say that, but I suspect they think it. Wilson headed DOD under Ike. Trump has had his own set of rich men, members of the elite albeit rather second level, serving in his administration.
My bottom line is that there's always been a mixture of motivations for public service: some people want new fields to explore (think Sen. Corker), some people want a career in politics moving in and out of government depending on which party is in control, some just fall into it.
[Update: Erik Loomis at Lawyers, Guns, & Money visits the grave of Joseph Choate, touching on some of the good and bad aspects of the old-time elite beliefs. Choate's brother founded the Choate private school, now Choate-Rosemary Hall, attended by many elite, including JFK. ]
Saturday, December 01, 2018
Catching Up With Sharon Astyk
Years ago I followed the blog of Sharon Astyk. She was an interesting writer, an environmentalist who pushed peak oil and locavore ideas. She and her husband and children lived on a small farm where she did her canning, writing books, and held classes on her ideas. I didn't agree with her ideas but found her persona appealing.
Time passed and she gradually dropped the blog and pushing her ideas and devoted more time and energy to foster children. (I don't know if she ever dealt with the failure of her predictions to eventuate.)
The other day I googled her and found this article: the Astyks have left the farm for an urban setting, taking advantage of a city for rearing foster children with special needs.
Time passed and she gradually dropped the blog and pushing her ideas and devoted more time and energy to foster children. (I don't know if she ever dealt with the failure of her predictions to eventuate.)
The other day I googled her and found this article: the Astyks have left the farm for an urban setting, taking advantage of a city for rearing foster children with special needs.
Friday, November 30, 2018
Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC) Business Center
Hadn't seen this before this public notice of redelegations of authority by the secretary of USDA. Turns out I'm way way late to the game.
This is what is included in the 2019FY budget for the center.
This is the explanation of the center:
According to this article on the creation of FPAC from February Bob Stephenson is the head and the initiation of the center is Oct 1.
One of the complications in implementing this is the mixed legal status of NRCS--it's a federal agency working with the Soil and Water Conservations Districts which are established by state law and get funding from states and which have their own organization to lobby Congress.
This is what is included in the 2019FY budget for the center.
This is the explanation of the center:
"The Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC) Business Center is a centralized operations office within the FPAC mission area and headed by the Chief Operating Officer (COO), who is also the Executive Vice President of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). The FPAC Business Center is responsible for financial management, budgeting, human resources, information technology, acquisitions/procurement, customer experience, internal controls, risk management, strategic and annual planning, and other similar activities for the FPAC mission area and its component agencies, including the Farm Service Agency (FSA), the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and the Risk Management Agency (RMA). The FPAC Business Center ensures that systems, policies, procedures, and practices are developed that provide a consistent enterprise-wide view to effectively and efficiently deliver programs to FPAC customers, including farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners."It sounds very much like Sec. Glickman's proposal in the late 1990's, a proposal which was killed in Congress.
According to this article on the creation of FPAC from February Bob Stephenson is the head and the initiation of the center is Oct 1.
One of the complications in implementing this is the mixed legal status of NRCS--it's a federal agency working with the Soil and Water Conservations Districts which are established by state law and get funding from states and which have their own organization to lobby Congress.
Thursday, November 29, 2018
Seeing Into the Future--Democratic House-Senate Split
Perry Bacon at Fivethirtyeight has a piece on the growth of the progressive wing of the House Democratic party. While the Blue Dogs have revived a bit, the progressives were strengthened much more by the results of 2018. This got me to thinking, always dangerous.
Pelosi will be the Speaker, and she'll have to work to keep her caucus united. Meanwhile, over on the Senate side McConnell will lead a slightly stronger Republican party, which is also more conservative, losing Flake and what's his face from Nevada. And Schumer's Democrats are facing a tough road in the 2020 elections. He'll want to protect his incumbents and try to lay the groundwork to challenge the vulnerable Republicans in 2020.
All this reflects the increasing division of the country, as shown in our elections: the red States went a little redder and the blue and purple areas went more blue, or in institutional terms, the Senate goes conservative and the House goes liberal.
So Pelosi, Schumer, and McConnell will be deeply challenged to get legislation passed, particularly the Dems.
55+ years ago a government professor of mine named Theodore J. Lowi theorized, perhaps not originally with him, that changes in parties didn't happen by the out-party changing their policies but by the in-party dividing and losing focus. Not sure how that theory stands up to today's politics.
[updated to add second link]
Pelosi will be the Speaker, and she'll have to work to keep her caucus united. Meanwhile, over on the Senate side McConnell will lead a slightly stronger Republican party, which is also more conservative, losing Flake and what's his face from Nevada. And Schumer's Democrats are facing a tough road in the 2020 elections. He'll want to protect his incumbents and try to lay the groundwork to challenge the vulnerable Republicans in 2020.
All this reflects the increasing division of the country, as shown in our elections: the red States went a little redder and the blue and purple areas went more blue, or in institutional terms, the Senate goes conservative and the House goes liberal.
So Pelosi, Schumer, and McConnell will be deeply challenged to get legislation passed, particularly the Dems.
55+ years ago a government professor of mine named Theodore J. Lowi theorized, perhaps not originally with him, that changes in parties didn't happen by the out-party changing their policies but by the in-party dividing and losing focus. Not sure how that theory stands up to today's politics.
[updated to add second link]
Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Diversity at the Founding
J. L. Bell in Boston 1776 discusses the deliberations which led to the Great Seal (and Franklin's turkey). The various proposals included this one, from a Swiss artist who was consulted by the Continental Congress:
Du Simitière:
The Americans involved seem to have favored classical themes and references, but the outsider was struck by our diversity.
Du Simitière:
For the Seal he proposes. The Arms of the several Nations from whence America has been peopled, as English, Scotch, Irish, Dutch, German &c. each in a Shield. On one side of them Liberty, with her Pileus, on the other a Rifler, in his Uniform, with his Rifled Gun in one Hand, and his Tomahauk, in the other. This Dress and these Troops with this Kind of Armour, being peculiar to America…
The Americans involved seem to have favored classical themes and references, but the outsider was struck by our diversity.
USDA Civil Rights Post
The president's nominee to be assistant secretary for civil right faced her Senate Ag committee hearing.
She was head of the EEO office in 1987-90. I wonder if she was asked about the Pigford suits and settlements at all?
She was head of the EEO office in 1987-90. I wonder if she was asked about the Pigford suits and settlements at all?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)