Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Friday, March 23, 2018
What's 700 Points on the Dow Worth
Not a mention on the front page of either the Post or the Times. Times have changed.
Tuesday, March 20, 2018
The Search for Buttermilk and Doom for Cows
My spouse was inspired by the recent St. Patrick's Day to bake Irish Soda Bread, for which she needed buttermilk.
She checked Trader Joe's: out. I checked Safeway--not available. Finally found a quart at Giant.
I was amazed, absolutely amazed though, by the pseudo "milk" on sale. There were a couple upright coolers devoted to the usual 2 percent milk in gallons, plus a variety of milk of kinds and quantities. Next to them were two more coolers devoted mostly to half gallons and quarts of all the various kinds of "milk"--almond, soy, and I don't know what else. There was another cooler partly devoted to cream products like half and half, whipping cream, etc. and at least another with specialty "milk" type products.
Even with the authority of wikipedia behind them, dairy farmers are in trouble:
She checked Trader Joe's: out. I checked Safeway--not available. Finally found a quart at Giant.
I was amazed, absolutely amazed though, by the pseudo "milk" on sale. There were a couple upright coolers devoted to the usual 2 percent milk in gallons, plus a variety of milk of kinds and quantities. Next to them were two more coolers devoted mostly to half gallons and quarts of all the various kinds of "milk"--almond, soy, and I don't know what else. There was another cooler partly devoted to cream products like half and half, whipping cream, etc. and at least another with specialty "milk" type products.
Even with the authority of wikipedia behind them, dairy farmers are in trouble:
"In food use, the term milk is defined under Codex Alimentarius standards as: "the normal mammary secretion of milking animals obtained from one or more milkings without either addition to it or extraction from it, intended for consumption as liquid milk or for further processing."[22] This definition thereby precludes non-animal products which may resemble milk in color and texture (milk substitutes) such as soy milk, rice milk, almond milk, and coconut milk. The correct name for such products are 'soy beverage', 'rice beverage', etc.
Dairy relates to milk and milk production, e.g. dairy products.
Deep State? Shocking
I believe in the "deep state".
There's a poll out which shows support for a theory of the "deep state" is surprisingly high, surprising to some that is.
Personally I think it's common sense, though I define "deep state" a little differently. In my view there are a relatively small number (i.e. less than 1 percent of Americans) who routinely affect the way government operates in ways which aren't visible to Americans on a daily basis. This would include all the riders and special provisions tucked into laws, particularly appropriations acts and omnibus or "must pass" legislation. It would include all the lobbyists, pollsters, and members of the "chattering class", as William Safire used to call them. And of course it includes the bureaucrats and lawyers who are concerned with process and procedure, much to the dismay of some politicians.
In most cases the deep state is operating within the overall context set by the limits of public support. An example on the liberal side--I could argue the "deep state" essentially legalized gay marriage.
There's a poll out which shows support for a theory of the "deep state" is surprisingly high, surprising to some that is.
Personally I think it's common sense, though I define "deep state" a little differently. In my view there are a relatively small number (i.e. less than 1 percent of Americans) who routinely affect the way government operates in ways which aren't visible to Americans on a daily basis. This would include all the riders and special provisions tucked into laws, particularly appropriations acts and omnibus or "must pass" legislation. It would include all the lobbyists, pollsters, and members of the "chattering class", as William Safire used to call them. And of course it includes the bureaucrats and lawyers who are concerned with process and procedure, much to the dismay of some politicians.
In most cases the deep state is operating within the overall context set by the limits of public support. An example on the liberal side--I could argue the "deep state" essentially legalized gay marriage.
Monday, March 19, 2018
Teleworking and USDA
USDA made the paper this morning for cutting back on the hours employees can telework (here's GovExec's piece).
Teleworking developed after my time at FSA. Obviously employees like it and environmentalists do as well. Without any experience of it, I'm left with just opinions with no basis for them.
But, as a manager, I would have had problems with it, just as I had problems with flextime. Back when I was a young employee, we worked 8 to 4:30. That meant first thing in the morning we might gather at the coffee pot to start. It meant you always knew who was in and who was on leave. It meant you could easily schedule meetings (likely we spent more time in unproductive meetings than was good for us--I remember Roy "T"'s acid comments on the division director's staff meetings in the late 70's).
The work of the unit I managed wasn't easily quantifiable--a manager could give work assignments knowing how much time it should take.
On the other hand, I often had employees in Kansas City working with the IT people on requirements and testing. I had no problem trusting my employees with working a thousand miles away from the office, so why would I have problems with them working 20-30 miles from the office? Two considerations:
Teleworking developed after my time at FSA. Obviously employees like it and environmentalists do as well. Without any experience of it, I'm left with just opinions with no basis for them.
But, as a manager, I would have had problems with it, just as I had problems with flextime. Back when I was a young employee, we worked 8 to 4:30. That meant first thing in the morning we might gather at the coffee pot to start. It meant you always knew who was in and who was on leave. It meant you could easily schedule meetings (likely we spent more time in unproductive meetings than was good for us--I remember Roy "T"'s acid comments on the division director's staff meetings in the late 70's).
The work of the unit I managed wasn't easily quantifiable--a manager could give work assignments knowing how much time it should take.
On the other hand, I often had employees in Kansas City working with the IT people on requirements and testing. I had no problem trusting my employees with working a thousand miles away from the office, so why would I have problems with them working 20-30 miles from the office? Two considerations:
- in Kansas City they were working face to face with their counterparts, not alone. That meant I could get a bit of feedback from my opposite number manager in KC.
- the bottom line issue is trust and it's the rare group of 6-10 people where all are equally trustworthy IMHO. So you either bite the bullet and trust all equally, or you recognize differences among the employees, meaning you don't treat them equally.
All in all, I'm glad I'm no longer a manager who has to make such decisions.
Saturday, March 17, 2018
J. Edgar's Long Shadow
This is pure speculation, but I believe we can blame J. Edgar Hoover for Mr. McCabe's firing.
Why?
Back in the day, that's the 1920's, 1930's, 1940's, 1950's, 1960's, and only ending in 1972, Hoover ruled the roost at the (Federal) Bureau of Investigation. He was a very political leader, using information to protect his position and advance his issues. He had strict rules for his agents, because he was the one who could bend the rules.
My speculation is that the FBI culture retains that dichotomy: rules on the one hand, leaks to advance the agency or leader on the other. And that seems to be what happened with McCabe. He authorized a discussion on background to, he says, correct erroneous information reaching the public. He claims it was something often done, but it seems to have also been against the rules. So when OIG people interviewed him, he was caught in the middle, not admitting to something which was okay by FBI norms, but not the rules.
Again, speculation, but to me the culture of an agency lasts, and lasts.
Why?
Back in the day, that's the 1920's, 1930's, 1940's, 1950's, 1960's, and only ending in 1972, Hoover ruled the roost at the (Federal) Bureau of Investigation. He was a very political leader, using information to protect his position and advance his issues. He had strict rules for his agents, because he was the one who could bend the rules.
My speculation is that the FBI culture retains that dichotomy: rules on the one hand, leaks to advance the agency or leader on the other. And that seems to be what happened with McCabe. He authorized a discussion on background to, he says, correct erroneous information reaching the public. He claims it was something often done, but it seems to have also been against the rules. So when OIG people interviewed him, he was caught in the middle, not admitting to something which was okay by FBI norms, but not the rules.
Again, speculation, but to me the culture of an agency lasts, and lasts.
Friday, March 16, 2018
Dairy at a Turning Point?
That's the question in this piece., specifically talking about the Northeast and Pennsylvania. It gets into the nitty-gritty of milk pricing which I don't understand.
Thursday, March 15, 2018
Vertical/Indoor Farms
Here's a Fortune article on an outfit in NJ.
Here's a Technology Review piece on farming in shipping containers.
It's possible that the advent of LED lights makes such farming economically feasible, feasible at least if the produce gets a premium from being "local" and "organic". USDA has agreed that they may be labeled "organic", though the original organic community does not like the idea at all.
Call me old, I am, but I don't call these "farms" or "farming".
Here's a Technology Review piece on farming in shipping containers.
It's possible that the advent of LED lights makes such farming economically feasible, feasible at least if the produce gets a premium from being "local" and "organic". USDA has agreed that they may be labeled "organic", though the original organic community does not like the idea at all.
Call me old, I am, but I don't call these "farms" or "farming".
Wednesday, March 14, 2018
Humans Are Resilient
I back my assertion with three points:
- my experience as a draftee in the Army
- Chris Blattman in his interview by Tyler Cowen
- Stephen Hawking.
That is all.
Keeping Up With Lawyers and Business: Contract Farming
Modern Farmer reports that SBA's inspector general has determined that poultry farmers operating on a contract with a processor (which 97 percent do) don't qualify as a "small business".
Reminds me of back in the day when ASCS determined that growers of seed corn, which operate under a contract with seed companies, didn't qualify as "producers" because they didn't share in the risk of producing the crop. That determination was speedily reversed by pressure from Congress (not sure they put it in legislation or appropriations, but reversed it was).
The bottom line is people don't like risk, so for many many years people have been planning and scheming on ways to minimize it.
Reminds me of back in the day when ASCS determined that growers of seed corn, which operate under a contract with seed companies, didn't qualify as "producers" because they didn't share in the risk of producing the crop. That determination was speedily reversed by pressure from Congress (not sure they put it in legislation or appropriations, but reversed it was).
The bottom line is people don't like risk, so for many many years people have been planning and scheming on ways to minimize it.
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
USDA EEO
Secretary Perdue is proposing to reorganize USDA civil rights offices--he's asking for comments on his proposal. Strikingly, he's allowing only until March 25 for comments to be received.
I've long since lost my grasp of how USDA is organized so I don't really understand what he's doing. One change seems to be giving each mission area (I think NRCS, FSA, RMA are now or will a mission area) one civil rights/EEO office. That would mean taking the Office of Civil Rights out of FSA and putting it at the Under Secretary level.
It seems he's also changing the department level office. Given what happened under Reagan I'd suspect it would have less power, but that's pure speculation.
I've long since lost my grasp of how USDA is organized so I don't really understand what he's doing. One change seems to be giving each mission area (I think NRCS, FSA, RMA are now or will a mission area) one civil rights/EEO office. That would mean taking the Office of Civil Rights out of FSA and putting it at the Under Secretary level.
It seems he's also changing the department level office. Given what happened under Reagan I'd suspect it would have less power, but that's pure speculation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)