Josh Marshall has a post discussing violence against the alt-right. He's against it, arguing that it's works to the benefit of the far right and undermines the rule of law.
While I'm with him on that, he doesn't pay enough attention to the seduction of violence, although he does admit he enjoys seeing a Nazi punched. Most any football fan will say they enjoy a "good hit" on the opposing quarterback, running back, or receiver. That's human--we like violence against our opponents (though we'll be sure to call for a flag if our quarterback, running back, or receiver is on the receiving end of a "vicious, illegal hit").
The antifa types seem to be much the same demographic as the alt-right: young males, though perhaps with a few more females and a sprinkling of people of color you wouldn't see in the alt-right. But extremism attracts the similar people on both ends, although the left perhaps has a more intellectual gloss to their actions. I suspect if you could do a brain scan of either group in the midst of an action, a march or a counter-demonstration, you'd see the same areas of the brain activated, areas which have little to do with rational thought.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Monday, August 28, 2017
Saturday, August 26, 2017
Memory and Action
One of the problems we old geezers have is memory. Not only are we losing it, particularly the short-term variety, but to the extent we retain some, we can be immobilized by it.
Maybe that's the problem with the controversies over memorials. Memorials are signs, and important. but devote too much concern to the past and the future evades your grasp. Much better in my mind to err on the side of focusing on the future, than the past. (Yet, and yet, I tried to be a historian once--how does that fit? Don't know.)
Maybe that's the problem with the controversies over memorials. Memorials are signs, and important. but devote too much concern to the past and the future evades your grasp. Much better in my mind to err on the side of focusing on the future, than the past. (Yet, and yet, I tried to be a historian once--how does that fit? Don't know.)
Friday, August 25, 2017
Bad News for Organic Farmers
Now that Amazon's acquisition of Whole Foods has been approved, Bezos' first step was to cut the prices of some organic produce, probably signalling an emphasis on lower prices in the future. IMHO that's bad news for organic farmers, who will face pressure to take lower prices, also meaning they will face their own pressure to enlarge their operations and/or cut corners in order to survive. So the long summer of years when organic farmers could ask for and get a sizable premium for purity is drawing to a close, and they face a turbulent fall and then: "Winter is Coming".
Thursday, August 24, 2017
Wind River
Saw the movie today and liked it. Written by the same guy who did Hell or High Water and Sicario, both of which we liked. Atmosphere a bit like Longmire, a Netflix series we also like (i.e., rural area, Native Americans and whites).
Lesson for the Week
"Always remember: driverless cars don’t have to be perfect. They
just have to be better than cars driven by humans. As anyone who drives
is aware, that’s sort of a low bar these days."
From Kevin Drum
From Kevin Drum
Monday, August 21, 2017
My Dilemma With Game of Thrones
I follow a lot of blog feeds. Have done since the days of Google Reader. Many of my feeds include good pieces on Game of Thrones. For example, here's a New Yorker piece.
Now since I'm getting a little deaf, not quite as deaf as my wife thinks but a little, I often like to follow British shows through DVD's, because that way I can get the subtitles. (I know, there's probably a way to get subtitles on cable, but I'm too lazy to explore it.) And because I'm getting a little senile, there's another benefit: I can watch episodes back to back, without straining my memory to track from one week to another what happened. And a third benefit: I can go to bed earlier, without having to watch from 10 pm to 11 or whatever.
All of this means a dilemma: if I read the blog posts on the episodes as they come out, I inevitably get a lot of spoilers. If I don't, there's no way, no easy way, to go back and pick them up when the DVD's are released and I'm watching them. Life's not fair, sometimes.
Now since I'm getting a little deaf, not quite as deaf as my wife thinks but a little, I often like to follow British shows through DVD's, because that way I can get the subtitles. (I know, there's probably a way to get subtitles on cable, but I'm too lazy to explore it.) And because I'm getting a little senile, there's another benefit: I can watch episodes back to back, without straining my memory to track from one week to another what happened. And a third benefit: I can go to bed earlier, without having to watch from 10 pm to 11 or whatever.
All of this means a dilemma: if I read the blog posts on the episodes as they come out, I inevitably get a lot of spoilers. If I don't, there's no way, no easy way, to go back and pick them up when the DVD's are released and I'm watching them. Life's not fair, sometimes.
Sunday, August 20, 2017
Changes in Culture: Swearing
This New REpublic piece discusses research into the frequency of swearing in America, specifically the use of the seven words in American books. The research found a vast increase (28 times) between the early 50's and the late oughts.
The article is dismissive of the research, claiming it's not good social science. That may be, but as someone has lived over those years, the prevalence of swearing is to me just a sign of the changing culture.
I'm tempted to say "standards are falling" but I'll just say changing.
The article is dismissive of the research, claiming it's not good social science. That may be, but as someone has lived over those years, the prevalence of swearing is to me just a sign of the changing culture.
I'm tempted to say "standards are falling" but I'll just say changing.
Saturday, August 19, 2017
Virginia as Multi-Cutural
Tyler Cowen has a post on that theme at Bloomberg.
An anecdote: a relative recently attended the high school graduation of a grandson in North Andover, MA. She commented to me she was surprised by how diverse the area had become (she was a girl in Andover during the 1940's). I looked up on wikipedia and found North Andover was, in 2010, about 6 percent minority. Currently the school's site says 18+ percent are minority.
According to Cowen Charlottesville is 9 percent minority. Fairfax county is about 50 percent.
I'm the sort of soft-headed bleeding heart liberal who enjoys this.
An anecdote: a relative recently attended the high school graduation of a grandson in North Andover, MA. She commented to me she was surprised by how diverse the area had become (she was a girl in Andover during the 1940's). I looked up on wikipedia and found North Andover was, in 2010, about 6 percent minority. Currently the school's site says 18+ percent are minority.
According to Cowen Charlottesville is 9 percent minority. Fairfax county is about 50 percent.
I'm the sort of soft-headed bleeding heart liberal who enjoys this.
Thursday, August 17, 2017
Death Panels Exist: For Strawberries
A NewYorker article: (Varieties are made obsolete based on the decisions of an internal group called the Dead Variety Society.)
Bad Logic in the Fifth Circuit
For some reason, this decision voiding a fine on Exxon-Mobil for a pipeline spill gets my goat.
Imagine a similar decision on airline accidents:
Imagine a similar decision on airline accidents:
"“The fact that the [accident] occurred, while regrettable, does not necessarily mean that [Boeing/United Airlines/the pilot] failed to abide by the [rules for building and operating airplanes] pipeline integrity regulations in considering the appropriate risk factors,” the court wrote. “The unfortunate fact of the matter is that, despite adherence to safety guidelines and regulations, [airplanes] still do occur.” [brackets indicate where I've changed the terms]Because we have a zero tolerance for planes falling out of the sky they don't. Why not the same zero tolerance for pipeline spills?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)