N. Gregory Mankiw has a piece here--he paid $2500 apiece for "Hamilton" tickets in NY and is reasonably happy about it. As a market economist he sees it in terms of supply and demand, mourning only that the creators of the show get only the benefit of the $500 face price.
What's interesting to me is the comments: the most "liked" comments are those trashing the rich plutocrat who can afford such a price. I'm not sure whether that's coming from the presumably liberal readers of the NYTimes or from those who support Mr. Trump. Probably the former, that would be more consistent with the liberal ethos. But it's a little straw in the wind which shows the support Clinton can get for "soaking the rich".
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Friday, October 21, 2016
Thursday, October 20, 2016
Drum's Crystal Ball
Kevin Drum had a crystal ball post--how will Paul Ryan and Clinton work together after the election. He got a lot of comments.
All I know is it's going to be interesting. One problem for the Democrats is the number of senators up for reelection in 2018, including a number from red states (Manchin, Heidtkamp, etc.). So there's a strategic choice in the Senate: either go for broke on liberal issues (assuming you can get the Dems to buy it) and sacrifice your majority in 2018; or try to preserve your majority in 2018 by dodging the more controversial issues, at the risk of aggravating the left and laying the ground for a challenge in 2020.
All I know is it's going to be interesting. One problem for the Democrats is the number of senators up for reelection in 2018, including a number from red states (Manchin, Heidtkamp, etc.). So there's a strategic choice in the Senate: either go for broke on liberal issues (assuming you can get the Dems to buy it) and sacrifice your majority in 2018; or try to preserve your majority in 2018 by dodging the more controversial issues, at the risk of aggravating the left and laying the ground for a challenge in 2020.
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
What's a "Colorist"?
Did Bess Truman have one?
Apparently Michelle Obama invited a number of people to last night's state dinner based on their personal service to her over the last seven years. I understood hairstylist and makeup artist, but "colorist"? A brief check of the Internet yields little that's helpful, unless Mrs.Obama has been dyeing her hair?
We've come a long way as a society from the days when Bess Truman was "Boss".
Apparently Michelle Obama invited a number of people to last night's state dinner based on their personal service to her over the last seven years. I understood hairstylist and makeup artist, but "colorist"? A brief check of the Internet yields little that's helpful, unless Mrs.Obama has been dyeing her hair?
We've come a long way as a society from the days when Bess Truman was "Boss".
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Consequence and Lab Girl
Was away on annual visit to Sheep and Wool Festival in Rhinebeck. Two books to recommend, both as it happens by people raised in the Presbyterian church, which must be why I like both:
Consequence, by Eric Fair. Memoir of someone who had tours with our military and our contractors, with the major focus on interrogations in Iraq and religion.
Lab Girl, by Hope Jahren. Memoir of a woman growing from a high school science lab (great evocation of the sort of lab I remember) through a career as paleo/geo/botanist.
Consequence, by Eric Fair. Memoir of someone who had tours with our military and our contractors, with the major focus on interrogations in Iraq and religion.
Lab Girl, by Hope Jahren. Memoir of a woman growing from a high school science lab (great evocation of the sort of lab I remember) through a career as paleo/geo/botanist.
Monday, October 10, 2016
Divisions in the GOP
I've been dubious of discussions of current events which see today as unique, without precedent. One of my touchstones in electoral matters is 1964, when the nomination of Barry Goldwater caused big divisions in the Republican Party. I remember Rockefeller being booed off the stage by the victorious AUH20 delegates so naturally I believe that was worse than anything we see today.
But maybe not. I happened to do aGoogle search ("google" is redundant, isn't it?) for Republicans who supported LBJ in 1964 and found this Stu Rothenburg piece..
It seems that almost all Republican big shots supported Goldwater, at least on paper. Nixon, unlike Romney, campaigned for Goldwater. Eisenhower, unlike the Bushes, supported Goldwater. John Lindsay was the big name Republican to go for LBJ. Who was he? The Representative of the "Silk Stocking" district in NYC, identified as an up and comer, but also very liberal. The current day parallel might be Sen. Rubio, though a senator is a bigger name than a mere representative, even one for whom the NYTimes is the hometown paper.
So it seems to me, very tentatively, that the GOP is more divided at the top these days than it was in 1964. And, perhaps, the GOP was more divided, or rather less partisan, at the grassroots than it is today. If that's true, maybe it's the result of a more national media,
But maybe not. I happened to do a
It seems that almost all Republican big shots supported Goldwater, at least on paper. Nixon, unlike Romney, campaigned for Goldwater. Eisenhower, unlike the Bushes, supported Goldwater. John Lindsay was the big name Republican to go for LBJ. Who was he? The Representative of the "Silk Stocking" district in NYC, identified as an up and comer, but also very liberal. The current day parallel might be Sen. Rubio, though a senator is a bigger name than a mere representative, even one for whom the NYTimes is the hometown paper.
So it seems to me, very tentatively, that the GOP is more divided at the top these days than it was in 1964. And, perhaps, the GOP was more divided, or rather less partisan, at the grassroots than it is today. If that's true, maybe it's the result of a more national media,
Friday, October 07, 2016
Predictions: Senate
The Senate may be controlled by the Democrats, but likely by a very slim margin. Based on our history, a 50/50 split or 51/49 split is going to be unstable. Among the events which can affect passage of a specific bill and/or control of the Senate (disregarding the likelihood of a filibuster and the need for 60 votes)
- any individual senator can hold out for his or her favorite project issue (we saw that in the ACA negotiations--the senators from LA, AR, and NE at different times held out for something special)
- a senator may switch parties
- special elections to fill vacancies (first of all--the VA seat Kaine now holds) from resignations or death. Note most governors are Republicans, in cases where they have authority. Such elections will attract gobs of money.
Thursday, October 06, 2016
Senior Moments, the Frequency of
Has anyone graphed the occurrence of "senior moments" during a life. IMHO it probably follows a "power law", similar to this graph, where age is the horizontal axis and number of senior moments in a year the vertical axis. (Disregard the values on this graph--it's the best image I could find quickly.)
Wednesday, October 05, 2016
Life Lessons from Kevin Drum
Kevin Drum had earlier blogged about the idea his cancer wasn't a particularly educational illness; no big revelations about life had followed from the discovery or treatment .
In this piece he muses about the idea that sharing one's personal experience can help others, even if it is only to say people are not alone. There shouldn't be the expectation that illness is life-changing; sometimes it's just something to work through, or not.
In this piece he muses about the idea that sharing one's personal experience can help others, even if it is only to say people are not alone. There shouldn't be the expectation that illness is life-changing; sometimes it's just something to work through, or not.
Vote to Preserve the WH Garden?
If you don't like the Democratic ticket you can at least vote to preserve Michelle Obama's White House Garden. PBS Newshour covers a ceremony this afternoon which tries to preserve it as a permanent feature of the grounds. Not quite comparable to Jackie's Garden, but something.
I think I've noted earlier my skepticism that the Obama children ever did much in it, despite their mother's naive
hopes when it was first announced. That's just as well, because I suspect Barron Trump won't be living in the White House and the Clinton grandchildren are too young. So the Park Service will continue to care for it.
Given what happened to Carter's solar roof, I'd expect Trump to do away with all Obama innovations. Indeed, I wish someone would ask him in the debates whether he plans to redecorate the White House to suit his tastes, maybe a nice gold color with "Trump" in neon above the portico?
The Clintons likely will continue with the garden, but without the fanfare.
I think I've noted earlier my skepticism that the Obama children ever did much in it, despite their mother's
Given what happened to Carter's solar roof, I'd expect Trump to do away with all Obama innovations. Indeed, I wish someone would ask him in the debates whether he plans to redecorate the White House to suit his tastes, maybe a nice gold color with "Trump" in neon above the portico?
The Clintons likely will continue with the garden, but without the fanfare.
Tuesday, October 04, 2016
Technology as Empowering, Even Dairy Cows
In some ways automated milking systems/robot milkers are the epitome of industrialized agriculture. It's easy to create an over-simplified picture in your mind of what's involved. I won't venture to compare these systems with our practices with 12 cows in a stanchion system, but much of this extension article surprised me. Some excerpts:
- "cow’s attendance to the milking station is not only dependent on the PMR and pellets [feed] offered in the RMS [robotic milking system], but also on feeding management, cow comfort, cow health, and social interactions among cows."
- "If forage moisture changes and rations are not adjusted promptly, visits may drop. The drop in visits will result in a decrease in milk production and an increase in the number of fetch cows. The increase in fetch cows may disrupt other cow behaviors, resulting in even bigger decreases in visits and milk production, leading to a downward spiral that creates much frustration for the producer. It is crucial to have consistent feeding in order to maintain high production and minimize the number of fetch cows[i.e. cows someone has to fetch and herd into the RMS]"
- "Cows like consistency. This is even more important in a RMS herd."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)