GovExec has a piece on presidential transitions, basically from a luncheon sponsored by the White House Transition Project.
It's focused on the White House, but there could be similar efforts at the department and agency level. Though come to think of it, it's likely in the case of USDA that incoming appointees used to work there, so have some institutional memory.
(Incidentally, now the passions have cooled, it appears the stories about the Clinton-Bush transition were overcranked.)
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Friday, February 19, 2016
The No-Good Thieving Daily Mail
I'm taking Nathan Yau's account at face value, but it seems convincing--in short, The Daily Mail has stolen his visualizations twice in a year, and has been accused of making it a general practice.
Not good.
Not good.
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Insurance Against Ransomware?
LA hospital paid ransom to free up their IT systems. Technology Review explains vulnerability. I wonder if any insurance company is offering insurance against this risk? It seems a logical step, which would also provide financing for investigators to work against such hackers.
Don't See "Hail Caesar"
Don't see it, that is, unless you're over 65 or are devoted to post WWII movies. If you meet either of those conditions, see it. It's very funny, with more of a message than you might expect.
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
Hypocrisy, Thy Name Is Human
Some more on Scalia:
- a Post piece by a liberal who clerked for him. At least during the first 20 years, he usually had a liberal clerk. I guess as a Catholic he believed in the devil's advocate (the post in sainthood proceedings).
- politicians are by nature hypocrites--a good way to persuade people is to make them believe you agree with them, and the only peaceful way to resolve conflicts is to persuade people.
- the fight over his replacement is occasion for a lot of hypocrisy on both sides.
- prognostications on the importance of the replacement process forget we have several senior justices, anyone of whom might kick the bucket at any moment, which would decidedly upset current calculations.
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
Bitching at OPM
Trying to be good and do taxes early this year. Need my statement from OPM. Their website has not, to my eyes, been updated in some years. Usually these days a commercial site has a "Sign in" button in the upper right corner which allows access to the customer account. Not so for OPM. They have "Services Online" stuck in the middle of the page. It should be obvious to the observant, but it wasn't to an old geezer.
Next, for some reason my password manager and OPM's software are allergic to each other. Over the years I've tried a few times to get into the site. I've never been able to manage it, without having to reset my password (part of the problem is the weird way they handle account numbers).
Finally they have two questions to determine whether you can request a new password by email or by snail mail. That's fine, except who remembers whether one's accessed the site within the last 15 months and set up security questions? I certainly don't. Consequently, OPM may be stuck not using an automated process to reset my password.
Next, for some reason my password manager and OPM's software are allergic to each other. Over the years I've tried a few times to get into the site. I've never been able to manage it, without having to reset my password (part of the problem is the weird way they handle account numbers).
Finally they have two questions to determine whether you can request a new password by email or by snail mail. That's fine, except who remembers whether one's accessed the site within the last 15 months and set up security questions? I certainly don't. Consequently, OPM may be stuck not using an automated process to reset my password.
Monday, February 15, 2016
Where Does Wisdom Lie
Often between the extremes, is my answer.
Steven Hayward, a blogger at Powerline (meaning middle right), mentions my favorite blogger, Kevin Drum here:
Steven Hayward, a blogger at Powerline (meaning middle right), mentions my favorite blogger, Kevin Drum here:
"Anyway, one of the writers in Mother Jones who is actually worth reading is Kevin Drum, because he does some good original reporting, and sometimes departs from leftist orthodoxy or at least offers some original thoughts. Yesterday on the Mother Jones blog, Drum beat his drum: Over the past few weeks I’ve written five posts making the following points:
- The acting Oscars are not really all that white.
- Flint is not a public health holocaust.
- The 1994 crime bill didn’t create mass incarceration.
- Photo ID laws probably don’t have massive turnout effects.
- Social welfare spending has gone up a lot over the past three decades, and welfare reform had very little impact on either this or the deep poverty rate."
Sunday, February 14, 2016
How We Handle Dangerous Animals
This is triggered by posts on Prof. Moskos' blog, Cop in the Hood. (He was a cop and is a sociology prof.)
Occasionally we have cases where the authorities have to deal with dangerous animals. Maybe a leopard escapes from a zoo, or a cattle truck overturns and a bunch of steers are running wild, or a bear wanders into the burbs to raid garbage cans, or ... Sometimes these situations end with death for the animal, sometimes no weapons are fired, sometimes a tranquilizer dart gun is used.
Occasionally we have cases where the authorities have to deal with dangerous humans. Maybe a man is running naked with a knife, or a youth is carrying what appears to be a rifle, or...
My question: is there a good reason for not approaching the two sets of situations in the same way?
My theory is that animals don't send the adrenaline flowing in quite the same way as humans, but is that a reflection of our culture or is it innate?
Occasionally we have cases where the authorities have to deal with dangerous animals. Maybe a leopard escapes from a zoo, or a cattle truck overturns and a bunch of steers are running wild, or a bear wanders into the burbs to raid garbage cans, or ... Sometimes these situations end with death for the animal, sometimes no weapons are fired, sometimes a tranquilizer dart gun is used.
Occasionally we have cases where the authorities have to deal with dangerous humans. Maybe a man is running naked with a knife, or a youth is carrying what appears to be a rifle, or...
My question: is there a good reason for not approaching the two sets of situations in the same way?
My theory is that animals don't send the adrenaline flowing in quite the same way as humans, but is that a reflection of our culture or is it innate?
Saturday, February 13, 2016
Famous People and Breast Cancer
ScholarlyKitchen passes on a 12 minute video of the scientist who found the BRCA1 gene (breast cancer) describing a little bit of what went into that. For a scientist she tells a funny story.
Midshipman Nicholson and Louisiana Purchase
A reminder that anonymous bureaucrats and functionaries play an indispensable role in history--see this description of the paperwork which went into implementing the actual purchase of Louisiana. Some 30 documents.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)