Secretary Vilsack announced new programs and more money for existing ones.
I didn't see any more money for FSA administration but I just skimmed.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Secretary Vilsack announced new programs and more money for existing ones.
I didn't see any more money for FSA administration but I just skimmed.
Some time ago David Hackett Fischer wrote a book comparing the USA and New Zealand.
I thought of that book when I read this Post opinion piece.
As you might understand from the title, Fischer sees the societies as different. Although they're both "settler societies", the key to the US is "freedom", the key to New Zealand is "fairness". I remember his argument was in part based on the histories--we fought the British to establish autonomy, freedom; New Zealand was settled later when the UK had learned better to deal with their colonies. Also, in the years between the settling of America and the settling of New Zealand the nature of British society had changed from a hierarchical aristocratic society to one with the urban working class arising.
While I remember Fischer dealing with the Maori influence on the overall society, I can't say he saw the same factors as in the op-ed. But the overall effect is the same--concern about the impact of one's actions on others, particularly the fairness of the impacts.
So, in the pandemic we have lots of resisters to the masks and lockdowns here, because people say it impairs our freedoms. In NZ they could impose restrictions because infecting others would be unfair.
The Covid Tracking project announces its end.
But the work itself—compiling, cleaning, standardizing, and making sense of COVID-19 data from 56 individual states and territories—is properly the work of federal public health agencies. Not only because these efforts are a governmental responsibility—which they are—but because federal teams have access to far more comprehensive data than we do, and can mandate compliance with at least some standards and requirements.
I wholeheartedly agree with this, and hope the Biden/Harris administration devotes money and attention to improving our statistical infrastructure, given the deficiencies revealed by pandemic.
Had my dental appointment today. It's a pain, but at my age I need to be careful with my teeth, something I wasn't during most of my life.
I am puzzled--my dental hygienist was commenting on the provision of vaccines to pharmacies. I wasn't quick on the draw--about 2 hours later I think to wonder--has she not received her vaccine shot? I thought that category would be close to the top.
I wrote earlier on my memories of various trials of adding pictures/TV to the telephone--all of which failed.
GovExec has a piece which may summarize the change from the pandemic:
"“The most important outcome of the pandemic wasn’t that it taught you how to use Zoom, but rather that it forced everybody else to use Zoom,” Autor told me. "We all leapfrogged over the coordination problem at the exact same time.” Meetings, business lunches, work trips—all these things will still happen in the after world."
It's an important point--just knowing that people with whom you need to communicate use the new method is great. It's rather like 20 years ago when you knew someone might have an email address, but maybe they only remembered to check it once in a blue moon, so you'd use the telephone instead of email.
It's possible the pandemic has peaked in the US with the graph of new infections flattening, possibly starting a decline, which would then be followed by a similar change in hospitalizations and deaths.
The conjunction of 400,000 deaths, the Biden inauguration, and the peak would be significant.
Had my second haircut since the start of the pandemic today. Some trepidation, given the new surge of cases which has hit Virginia, though not as hard here as elsewhere in the country.
This FCW article argues that Covid-19 should impact the government's priorities on IT. Ir's part of a larger set of speculations over the long term impacts. Maybe:
I'm reminded of Wouk's "The Caine Mutiny" which I read multiple times in youth. There was a couplet in it which I remember, notable because I don't remember much poetry.:
When in trouble or in doubt
Run in circles,
Scream and shout.
IIRC it was being applied to the USNavy, as their response to problems, perhaps by Lt. Keefer, but I may be wrong.
Anyhow it's a corollary of the Harshaw Rule--trouble and doubt occurs often when you're doing things for the first time, at least the first time within living memory. That's what we as a world and a nation are doing now with covid-19. It's new enough we have no assurance in what we're doing, so we get uptight and snap and fight.
Someone today noted that we have a huge number of different school systems, private, public, parochial, in different jurisdictions, all of which are using different approaches to handling schooling for the fall. Different because we don't know what are "best practices" for sure.
Lots of recriminations among the politicians about whose positions in the first quarter of the year were correct. I'm firm in my belief that the president screwed up, and continues to screw up the response. But, it's true enough we're all screwing up because we don't know now what we'll know in a year from now.
So I think people should chill, at least a bit, and put more emphasis on who's learned what and what process will be most enlightening and educational.