I read a paragraph like this, and it triggers me:
Agroecology is at a crossroads. The farming system—which is primarily practiced in the developing world but is gaining some traction in the U.S.—incorporates a suite of ecological growing practices into a wider philosophy rooted in shifting power from global agribusiness companies to peasant farmers.
The assumption behind it is that the "peasant farmer" way of life is preferable to any other. The further assumption is that big companies push farmers off their land. But what if the way of life available off the farm is, on the whole, what one prefers?
I retain some affection for farming as it was in the 1940's and 50's. There were good times and good memories. There were also downsides, and for me, a misfit between me and the possibilities of the style. Part of that was the advance of "production agriculture", to use a relatively neutral name for market-oriented farming, with increasing investments required to compete. So I was pushed.
But in my case, it was mostly pull. And I think over the course of history there's been more pull than push. To say otherwise is, in part, the romanticism of the liberal/progressive left.
No comments:
Post a Comment