Why do we have such duplication? There's no doubt good and necessary reasons for the programs, but I'd suggest one reason is human ego. Consider a politician, a Congressperson politician. Consider an activist. Now imagine a " need" for government action, and ask the activist to work for such action and the politician to pass a law implementing such action. I put "need" in quotes to recognize the word is just a placeholder for different categorizations according to the political philosophy of the onlooker.
The activist and politician face an immediate strategic choice:
- do they identify the existing government program and agency which is most closely related to the "need" and try to modify and enhance the program and agency accordingly?
- do they create a new program to be assigned to an existing agency?
- do they create a new agency to handle the new program?
All things considered, it will be easier for the activist and the politician to go with a separate program, preferably labeled in honor of the pol. Politicians don't campaign on improving existing programs; they campaign on creating new ones or shutting old ones down. That's the way our government works.
No comments:
Post a Comment