The NYTimes had a piece on the fading away of extra features which used to be included on DVDs. My wife and I are long-term subscribers to Netflix, back in the days before streaming, and we (or I at least) enjoyed most of the features, particularly the director commentaries. The best movies seemed usually to have been models of teamwork: a lot of talented people working together for a common goal. No doubt that was an exaggeration, or more kindly a rosy colored look back.
The commentaries varied widely: some directors would narrate the action on the scene--very boring. Others would use the action as the launching point for little stories, discussions of technique, particularly the more cinematic types. Some would make a point of praising the work of both the actors on screen and the members of the crew behind the scenes. Some series, like Breaking Bad, and Mad Men, would have multiple features and often two or more commentaries per episode.
I'll miss the extras.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Wednesday, April 18, 2018
Tuesday, April 17, 2018
Tabarrok's Great Post re: Facebook
Alex Tabarrok is the less prominent blogger at Marginal Revolution, but I think his post yesterday is great.
He makes the point that much of the data Facebook stores is created by Facebook, or more accurately in my mind by the combination of our activities which are enabled by and only possible through Facebook. As he says, speaking of a cousin in Dubai who he's never called or written a letter in over 20 years: "The relationship with my cousin, therefore, isn’t simply mine, it’s a joint creation of myself, my cousin and Facebook."
I tweeted about the post yesterday, not something I do everyday. I got a response from one person, and we've gone back and forth a bit. Let me summarize my position:
Like Tabarrok, I've a current relationship with a cousin which has been made possible through the Internet, email in the first instance, then shifting to AIM and finally to Facebook Messenger: a sequence of communication tools of better and better capability and more ease of use. I understand that the data stored in the cloud has changed with each tool: now Facebook keeps the full text of our messages. But the capability of the tool is an essential part of the relationship. Given our personalities and ages we didn't and couldn't establish it based on snail mail.
I (and my cousin) are interested in genealogy; she's writing a book (at 87) covering events in 19th century Ireland partly involving two collateral ancestors. For us, all bits of data are precious if they concern the lives of our ancestors, or the lives my cousin investigates. Of course the data is almost all on paper with just a little bit on film. What does the future hold for genealogists; how will they handle all the data which is now being stored and which presumably will be available?
He makes the point that much of the data Facebook stores is created by Facebook, or more accurately in my mind by the combination of our activities which are enabled by and only possible through Facebook. As he says, speaking of a cousin in Dubai who he's never called or written a letter in over 20 years: "The relationship with my cousin, therefore, isn’t simply mine, it’s a joint creation of myself, my cousin and Facebook."
I tweeted about the post yesterday, not something I do everyday. I got a response from one person, and we've gone back and forth a bit. Let me summarize my position:
Like Tabarrok, I've a current relationship with a cousin which has been made possible through the Internet, email in the first instance, then shifting to AIM and finally to Facebook Messenger: a sequence of communication tools of better and better capability and more ease of use. I understand that the data stored in the cloud has changed with each tool: now Facebook keeps the full text of our messages. But the capability of the tool is an essential part of the relationship. Given our personalities and ages we didn't and couldn't establish it based on snail mail.
I (and my cousin) are interested in genealogy; she's writing a book (at 87) covering events in 19th century Ireland partly involving two collateral ancestors. For us, all bits of data are precious if they concern the lives of our ancestors, or the lives my cousin investigates. Of course the data is almost all on paper with just a little bit on film. What does the future hold for genealogists; how will they handle all the data which is now being stored and which presumably will be available?
Monday, April 16, 2018
Better Than We Used To Be
Kottke has a post with an aerial photograph of Edinburgh in 1920. We don't know the time of year or day; we don't know whether the conditions were normal or abnormal. But what it suggests to me is a memory, a memory of the great London smog of 1952 (most recently dramatized in BBC's The Crown and of reading about the PA smog of 1948.
Using coal to heat houses, as we did our house when I was growing up, produced smoke which killed, most dramatically in the right (wrong) geographic and climactic conditions. That problem has been solved, at least for home heating.
Using coal to heat houses, as we did our house when I was growing up, produced smoke which killed, most dramatically in the right (wrong) geographic and climactic conditions. That problem has been solved, at least for home heating.
Sunday, April 15, 2018
Incredulity and Impeachment
I remember Watergate. In 1972 the conventional wisdom about impeachment was perhaps captured in JFK's Profiles in Courage--the impeachment of Andrew Johnson was wrong, very wrong, and the country was only saved by a Kansas senator's courage (IIRC--not bothering to look it up). The country had skated up to the edge then but had wisely drawn back. Impeachment was a constitutional dead letter, almost on a par with stationing soldiers in homes (Third Amendment), possibly used in the odd case of a judge, but not for presidents.
As Watergate unraveled, impeachment started to become possible. Then in the summer of 1974 suddenly things clicked into place and the avalanche started.
Will history repeat itself?
I don't think so--Republican support of Trump seems too solid, but as Watergate shows surprises can happen.
As Watergate unraveled, impeachment started to become possible. Then in the summer of 1974 suddenly things clicked into place and the avalanche started.
Will history repeat itself?
I don't think so--Republican support of Trump seems too solid, but as Watergate shows surprises can happen.
Saturday, April 14, 2018
Harshaw Rule in Aircraft Carriers
Another demonstration of the validity of the Harshaw Rule (first time fail) is in Robert Farley's piece on the worst aircraft carriers ever built (via Lawyers, Guns and Money).
Friday, April 13, 2018
Berkshire Hathaway and the Pay of Bigshots
From vox, in a piece on "pay ratios" the comparison of the pay of the CEO and the pay of the median employee in the company. Some ratios are over 1,000.
Not all of the pay ratios released so far are so gaudy. Warren Buffett, the CEO of conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, makes less than twice his company’s typical employee.
[Updated: Jeff Bezos earns 59 times the median Amazon employee according to this article.]
Not all of the pay ratios released so far are so gaudy. Warren Buffett, the CEO of conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, makes less than twice his company’s typical employee.
[Updated: Jeff Bezos earns 59 times the median Amazon employee according to this article.]
Thursday, April 12, 2018
Taxes Today
Finished our 2017 taxes today, using TurboTax. Seems to me they were more complicated than previous years, especially the boilerplate at the end. Although with Mr. Zuckerberg's testimony still fresh, I still clicked on "agree" without reading and understanding them. I'm sure there's reasons for them, but it doesn't make me happy.
What really makes me unhappy is this sentence: "In Sweden, you can see your tax forms already filled in and approve them on your cellphone." That's from a piece at Monkey Cage on the complexities of our tax system (John Sides interviewing a couple experts). One point made there--our system would be simpler if we taxed individuals rather than households. Kevin Drum has in the past pushed the idea of IRS preparing our returns from their available data, with the individual taxpayer responsible for confirming the correctness of the information and adding to it. It's a great idea, which Intuit will lobby against to their dying breath, so I guess today I contributed to the continuance of our system.
What really makes me unhappy is this sentence: "In Sweden, you can see your tax forms already filled in and approve them on your cellphone." That's from a piece at Monkey Cage on the complexities of our tax system (John Sides interviewing a couple experts). One point made there--our system would be simpler if we taxed individuals rather than households. Kevin Drum has in the past pushed the idea of IRS preparing our returns from their available data, with the individual taxpayer responsible for confirming the correctness of the information and adding to it. It's a great idea, which Intuit will lobby against to their dying breath, so I guess today I contributed to the continuance of our system.
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
Congress Reluctant on CCC Program
If China puts tariffs on soybeans and other farm commodities, there's been discussion by the Secretary and President of the possibility of providing help to affected farmers, using the authority of the Commodity Credit Corporation. That's getting some pushback from some in Congress, including Republican bigshots according to this article by Chris Clayton .
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
Banks With No Cash?
In Sweden, according to Steve Kelman here at FCW: ". In what might sound like a joke if it weren’t true, many banks carry no cash on their premises." Kelman is writing about Sweden and China, which he finds to be ahead of the U.S. in some areas of adopting IT:
"First, other countries’ edge over us is sometimes due to technology developed first outside the U.S., sometimes to quicker user adoption (something that would probably surprise most Americans), and sometimes to a greater ability to make non-tech organizational adjustments, such as eliminating minimum transaction values on credit cars, to get the tech to work better. Second, there are clearly efficiency benefits to the new technologies -- think only of the decline in hold ups in stores and bank robberies thanks to the disappearance of cash. But there are also benefits in terms of the general social climate for innovation."
Monday, April 09, 2018
Jefferson Versus Trump
Andy Seal has a post at USIntellectual History quoting Thomas Jefferson on the importance of public perception in maintaining ethical standards.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)