Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Monday, December 31, 2012
Round Bales (of Cotton, Not Hay)
The cotton growers have discovered the virtues of round bales, according to this. The piece mentions the changes ginners have to make, but nothing about the rest of the trade. Back in the days of "King Cotton", we used to export bales on steamships. I wonder whether we still export raw cotton today, and if so in what form?
It's Not All Partisanship in DC
Despite the headline news stories over the past week, month, year, decade from Washington, you'd be sorely slightly mistaken if you think the Capitol is solely devoted to partisan bickering.
The continuing saga of the farm bill is evidence to the contrary. According to this Politico story from this morning, the four leaders of House and Senate agriculture committees are united in proposing a 1-year extension (i.e., through Sept. 30) of the 2008 farm legislation, but Speaker Boehner is opposed.
The continuing saga of the farm bill is evidence to the contrary. According to this Politico story from this morning, the four leaders of House and Senate agriculture committees are united in proposing a 1-year extension (i.e., through Sept. 30) of the 2008 farm legislation, but Speaker Boehner is opposed.
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Battered Farmers and Extension
From a piece yesterday in the Times on prospects for an extension of the farm bill:
"Congressional aides say the extension could be for a year, giving farmers, who have been battered by the worst drought in 50 years, a reprieve after lawmakers were unable to come up with a new farm bill."Funny, but I thought I'd seen some reporting showing that, at least for crop farmers with crop insurance, 2012 was a good year despite the drought.
Friday, December 28, 2012
Why There's People Talking Past Each Other?
Via MonkeyCage, here's a map showing school shootings in the US over the last 15 years. Not sure of the criteria, looks to be a rather low bar. But two things struck me:
- a lot more shootings than I would have thought because it's not limited to mass shootings
- the wedge of states with none: Montana, the Dakotas, Wyoming, Nebraska, Kansas look to have no shootings. I'm guessing, but I'd suspect these states are mostly rural and mostly retain the hunting culture I grew up in, a culture where kids went deer hunting when they were old enough, having a 30.06 rifle was a mark of maturity, and handguns were things brought back from WWII. I suspect it's also an area with strong NRA representation.
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Why Milk Prices Shouldn't Rise: Break the Law
Usually bureaucrats think the law is sacrosanct, it's what we do. But the dirty reality is laws aren't self-executing; there's lots of provisions enacted into law which become a dead letter. The price of milk in 2013 should be one of them.
Without a new farm bill, the provisions of old law come into effect. That means for milk the government is supposed to support the price at a level which means $8 a gallon. But suppose USDA doesn't do so? Theoretically some group, presumably milk co-ops, could haul out their lawyers and file suit in federal court to force USDA's hand. My theory is, by the time the suit is written and filed, and DOJ works with OGC to come up with a reply, new law will have superseded the old law, and Congressional attorneys will have put in a provision which essentially nullifies the suit. Net effect: consumers don't see a rise in milk prices.
[Update: This is an example of why there are dead letter provisions: if the bureaucracy doesn't act on its own to implement a provision of law, there needs to be someone who can take USDA to court and/or with enough PR clout to raise a stink about it. In many cases there's neither.]
Without a new farm bill, the provisions of old law come into effect. That means for milk the government is supposed to support the price at a level which means $8 a gallon. But suppose USDA doesn't do so? Theoretically some group, presumably milk co-ops, could haul out their lawyers and file suit in federal court to force USDA's hand. My theory is, by the time the suit is written and filed, and DOJ works with OGC to come up with a reply, new law will have superseded the old law, and Congressional attorneys will have put in a provision which essentially nullifies the suit. Net effect: consumers don't see a rise in milk prices.
[Update: This is an example of why there are dead letter provisions: if the bureaucracy doesn't act on its own to implement a provision of law, there needs to be someone who can take USDA to court and/or with enough PR clout to raise a stink about it. In many cases there's neither.]
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Benghazi
A small part of the recent report on Benghazi is that top state department management was restrictive on resources.
the report that Mr. Pickering oversaw suggested that there was a culture of “husbanding resources” at senior levels of the State Department that contributed to the security deficiencies in Benghazi. Without identifying Mr. Kennedy or other senior officials, the report said that attitude “had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation.”I'm sure the Republicans who have been lambasting the Obama administration over their handling of diplomatic security and the fatal attack on our diplomats will use this as further ammunition. What right does management have to control spending by the people in the field?
Monday, December 24, 2012
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Praise for USA.gov
One of my hobbyhorses is more transparency on websites (excluding my own), particularly government ones. We as a community don't know what works and what doesn't unless we see some metrics. And if we don't know, we can't improve.
In light of that, I'd like to note usa.gov has a post of its most posts, pages, links. I wish more gov sites would do the same.
In light of that, I'd like to note usa.gov has a post of its most posts, pages, links. I wish more gov sites would do the same.
Merry Christmas from Chris Clayton
He has a tongue-in-cheek thank you post to Boehner and Cantor looking forward to the 2013 farm bill discussions.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Hennessey or Brooks
Interesting: Keith Hennessey is an economist who worked in the Bush White House. David Brooks is the columnist for the Times. Hennessey is on record as saying Obama was bluffing about vetoing a fiscal cliff bill he didn't like; Brooks today says (sounds like an off-the-record interview with the President) it's no bluff.
Politics is so interesting.
Politics is so interesting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)