The Supreme Court famously defanged FDR's court-packing plan by delivering some pro-New Deal decisions--the "switch in time saved nine".
There has been some discussion of possibly expanding the Supreme Court if the Democrats won the election. I think it's a non-starter, but some serious people have talked about it. Today's decision on the LGBTQ issue makes me wonder if SCOTUS will tread carefully between now and the election, just in case the polls are right and Dems win big.
Not a serious thought, but we'll see.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Monday, June 15, 2020
Sunday, June 14, 2020
Pandemic From 30,000 Feet Again
This is based on the NYTimes summary as of June 13.
It seems to me you can categorize states by the shapes of their case graphs:
It seems to me you can categorize states by the shapes of their case graphs:
- States with one defined peak, and a fairly consistent decline from that peak. This would include the NY/NJ/CT/MA states, with early peaks, and a number of other states which were slower to peak.
- States with two fairly clear peaks, which might include FL, TN, KY
- States which have never reached a peak--i.e., their case load is still climbing. Includes CA, TX, AL, UT, NC, SC, AR, KY,
- Small states with too few cases to evaluate.
- Mixed cases
Trying to create a story from this data, I go back to my previous pandemic post:
- the East Coast states were hit early because they are both well networked with Europe and dense. That meant they weren't prepared and got overwhelmed early, but they learned to take covid-19 seriously and adopted measures which reduced spread.
- other states didn't take the virus that seriously (i.e., even if they were officially locked down, public compliance was less than in the hard hit states), meaning if they were networked like FL, they could have an early peak and then a later one.
- possibly two peaks reflects a matter of luck, the virus hitting nursing homes, etc. once, then a slower spread to the more general population.
Saturday, June 13, 2020
A Sad Photo of Joyous Wedding
The Post had a picture of a wedding today, which I can't find online. It was illustrating a Lisa Bonos story on a convergence of BLM and the wedding in Philadelphia. All very joyous and feel-good, except when you look closely at the one photo of the wedding celebrants.
If I counted correctly there were 18 women and 7 men in the party. I can make assumptions about the cause of the apparent gender imbalance, but whatever the reasons IMHO it casts a shadow on the event.
If I counted correctly there were 18 women and 7 men in the party. I can make assumptions about the cause of the apparent gender imbalance, but whatever the reasons IMHO it casts a shadow on the event.
Friday, June 12, 2020
Watching the Messy Process of Implementation in the Field
I'm enjoying watching the FSA field people administering the CFAP by logging into the FSA Facebook Group.
I have to remember I'm lurking, and no longer have the knowledge nor authority to comment on anything. Much of the discussions seem familiar from times gone by but what's more visible (probably not new but it wasn't visible before) is the networking among the program technicians as they're officially called today. I wonder how many of the State and DC specialists are auditing this group?
NASCOE has had a system of "program" recommendations where they pass problems and suggestions from the field on to the DC specialists for possible resolution. It seems to take a while to make the circuit. Some of the problems raised in the Facebook group are resolvable there--just a lateral flow of knowledge and tips. Some of the problems may be tackled by people with special knowledge, particularly of the software. Since the group has maybe 1,000 members, and the field offices probably have 7K+ employees plus temps I wonder whether the lateral flow of info is reaching everyone it should.
I have to remember I'm lurking, and no longer have the knowledge nor authority to comment on anything. Much of the discussions seem familiar from times gone by but what's more visible (probably not new but it wasn't visible before) is the networking among the program technicians as they're officially called today. I wonder how many of the State and DC specialists are auditing this group?
NASCOE has had a system of "program" recommendations where they pass problems and suggestions from the field on to the DC specialists for possible resolution. It seems to take a while to make the circuit. Some of the problems raised in the Facebook group are resolvable there--just a lateral flow of knowledge and tips. Some of the problems may be tackled by people with special knowledge, particularly of the software. Since the group has maybe 1,000 members, and the field offices probably have 7K+ employees plus temps I wonder whether the lateral flow of info is reaching everyone it should.
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Children Born Racist?
CNN says they aren't. I disagree.
Children are born human. As such they have both the capacity to fear and flee from the unknown, and to know and love the known. The family and social structures they're born into will guide them to things to know, and how to fear the things they don't. Racism evolves from the interplay of the human abilities and the environment. It's inevitable.
Children are born human. As such they have both the capacity to fear and flee from the unknown, and to know and love the known. The family and social structures they're born into will guide them to things to know, and how to fear the things they don't. Racism evolves from the interplay of the human abilities and the environment. It's inevitable.
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
The Effect of Graphics
Both the NYTimes and the Washington Post have graphs showing the deaths due to the covid-19 virus over the days since Mar. 1. The Post's graph is on the front page, spanning one column, which represents 1/6 of the width of the paper. The Times' graph is on page 4, in their coronavirus update column, which is double width--two columns.
I've not measured the height scale, but the general effect is that the Post's graph shows a steep decline after a vertical rise in cases while the Times shows a much more gradual decline. Same data, different impressions.
I've not measured the height scale, but the general effect is that the Post's graph shows a steep decline after a vertical rise in cases while the Times shows a much more gradual decline. Same data, different impressions.
Monday, June 08, 2020
Reboot the Police
That's my position. I don't particularly want to reduce funding for police. History says, I think, that the public overreacts to swings in crime, cutting police excessively in low-crime periods, ignore a period of increase in crime, then over-fund police in an attempt to catch up. In other words, we overshoot both on increases and decreases.
What I do want is more research into policing-- we have so many different strategies proposed:
What I do want is more research into policing-- we have so many different strategies proposed:
- tough on crime, lots of policy,
- community policing--cops on the beat knowing the community
- broken-windows
- social services--replacing cops on the beat with social workers
- etc., etc.
Why can't we take precincts which are matched in demographics, etc. and use one strategy in one and a different one in the other. Keep the experiment going for years and learn.
Instead of taking money from police for the sake of taking money, raise taxes on me and you to fund needed and useful government services.
Sunday, June 07, 2020
Satisfaction With 911 Calls
What's surprising in this survey is the uniformity in responses across ethnic and gender lines. Though that's good, what isn't the percent saying the police improved the situation. (Might be because the situation had dissolved by the time the police got there, at least in part.)
Friday, June 05, 2020
World Pandemic from 30,000 Feet
Looking at the world wide incidence of covid-19, I see the influence of networks--it's as if the virus is a tracking molecule, like taking barium before a CT scan.
You start with Wuhan, which is networked both to Europe and the US. (I'm guessing it might have particular ties to Italy?) The US is more closely networked with Europe than China, so a majority of our virus imports seem to have come from there. Meanwhile nations such as Russia, India, and Brazil are less closely connected to China and, perhaps more significantly, are less networked internally than countries such as UK and US.
Within the US the NYTimes map shows a correlation, in my mind at least, between the timing and volume of cases and the networking of the state and county. Currently the Northeast states are on the down slope, while the Southeast states are on the upswing.
You start with Wuhan, which is networked both to Europe and the US. (I'm guessing it might have particular ties to Italy?) The US is more closely networked with Europe than China, so a majority of our virus imports seem to have come from there. Meanwhile nations such as Russia, India, and Brazil are less closely connected to China and, perhaps more significantly, are less networked internally than countries such as UK and US.
Within the US the NYTimes map shows a correlation, in my mind at least, between the timing and volume of cases and the networking of the state and county. Currently the Northeast states are on the down slope, while the Southeast states are on the upswing.
Thursday, June 04, 2020
The Police: Now and 1968
Lots of comparisons between the protests/riots of today and those of 1968. Lots of concerns about police.
IIRC in 1968 white liberals thought that integrating the police and establishing civilian review boards would solve the problems with the police. With hindsight, civilian review boards, where established, have not done well. The problem is likely the entrenched political power of police unions. Not only do police generally have a positive aura,but, like the NRA, they've the power of fierce unity.
And the police have been integrated, perhaps not as thoroughly and at all ranks in some places as they should be, but we know now that police who are minorities themselves can be authoritarian and abusive.
There have been gains in 52 years. The number of people killed now as opposed to 1968 is witness to that. I suspect, but don't know, that the property damage has been of an order of magnitude less. Part of that is learning from experience (though it seems we've forgotten a lot of the lessons of 1968) but much of it IMHO results from social trends.
Again, in IMHO, I think the problems we see with police today reflect continuing forces in society and economy. It's inevitable when you ask people to risk their lives, whether military, firefighters, police, or Doctors without Borders they're likely to develop esprit de corps, and an us versus them mentality. It's inevitable in crisis situations police get lots of attention, much unfavorable, which further aggravates the us versus them. When you add minorities to the mix, they'll often feel forced to do better, to go one step further in order to "prove" themselves. It's inevitable that public attention will fade as memories fade, meaning that police unions, based on the esprit de corps, will gain leverage over the political process. If you're willing to increase pay, you can chip away at union-enforced procedural rights. If you aren't willing, as most publics won't be most of the time, you'll allow polices to gain job security in lieu of more money.
IIRC in 1968 white liberals thought that integrating the police and establishing civilian review boards would solve the problems with the police. With hindsight, civilian review boards, where established, have not done well. The problem is likely the entrenched political power of police unions. Not only do police generally have a positive aura,but, like the NRA, they've the power of fierce unity.
And the police have been integrated, perhaps not as thoroughly and at all ranks in some places as they should be, but we know now that police who are minorities themselves can be authoritarian and abusive.
There have been gains in 52 years. The number of people killed now as opposed to 1968 is witness to that. I suspect, but don't know, that the property damage has been of an order of magnitude less. Part of that is learning from experience (though it seems we've forgotten a lot of the lessons of 1968) but much of it IMHO results from social trends.
Again, in IMHO, I think the problems we see with police today reflect continuing forces in society and economy. It's inevitable when you ask people to risk their lives, whether military, firefighters, police, or Doctors without Borders they're likely to develop esprit de corps, and an us versus them mentality. It's inevitable in crisis situations police get lots of attention, much unfavorable, which further aggravates the us versus them. When you add minorities to the mix, they'll often feel forced to do better, to go one step further in order to "prove" themselves. It's inevitable that public attention will fade as memories fade, meaning that police unions, based on the esprit de corps, will gain leverage over the political process. If you're willing to increase pay, you can chip away at union-enforced procedural rights. If you aren't willing, as most publics won't be most of the time, you'll allow polices to gain job security in lieu of more money.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)