I've been working on a post outlining various possibilities for the next 4 years, but it's not ready yet. But I'll mention this Politico piece, discussing the betting odds on a Trump impeachment. Apparently the betting world thinks it's a lot more likely for Trump to be impeached or resign than I do. I think most of that is wishful thinking, fed by our past history of Nixon and Clinton. Back in the day impeachment was not mentioned--it took a long while for the Congress to reach that point with Nixon--that's probably why I make long odds on that result.
[Updated to add: "“Trump is the gift that keeps on giving,” Paddy Power’s Davey
said. “We’ve got a bonanza of betting specials on The Donald. When Trump
took to Twitter this week to defend [daughter] Ivanka after Nordstrom
dropped her clothing line, we were out with a [betting] market on next
retailer to drop the Ivanka brand next.” (The current favorites are TJ
Maxx at 4-to-1, Walmart at 5-to-1 and Amazon at 6-to-1.)"]
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Sunday, February 12, 2017
The Economics of Growing Dairies
Dairy Carrie has a good interview with a dairy farmer (surprise). It briefly outlines the reasons dairies keep expanding and why they use immigrant labor. I remember my uncle's operation, I think in the neighborhood of 50 cows, which he ran mostly alone, though sometimes he had hired hands and/or a housekeeper (he was a German-American bachelor farmer). Not much time for other things, unless your barn burns and you have a heart attack, which gives you an exit strategy.
Saturday, February 11, 2017
High Probability of New Terrorist Attack?
I'm not quite sure what Nate Silver is talking about here:
Certainly there's some terrorist attack which could prompt Trump to ask for/get expanded powers, but what would it be?
Some possibilities:
natesilver: I mean, the probability of an actual or thwarted terrorist attack in the U.S. or in some NATO country over the next year or so has to be quite high. I’m not talking about something on a 9/11 or a Paris scale or anything like that, but something scary enough for Trump to use it as a cudgel to try to expand his powers. [emphasis added]The Paris attacks involved 3 attackers, the 9/11 19. The Orlando attack involved one, but killed 49.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-really-matters-from-trumps-first-3-weeks/
Certainly there's some terrorist attack which could prompt Trump to ask for/get expanded powers, but what would it be?
Some possibilities:
- a multi-person attack by refugees admitted before 2017 from one or more of the seven countries
- an attack which claims victims in the triple digits or more, particularly if multi-person.
- an attack on a particular target, like a sporting event, a civic event, a notable politician or eminent figure.
Thursday, February 09, 2017
The Wonders of the Federal System: Hypocrisy
One of the things the Founding Fathers did to us was to make us all hypocrites.
Politico has a piece on liberals using the same constitutional tactics against the new administration as the conservatives did against Obama's administration.
As I grow older and more cynical, I begin to think one of the virtues of the system is this encouragement of hypocrisy; surely no thinking politician can take herself entirely seriously when she has to change her stripes arguments every four or eight years. But then, how many "thinking politicians" are we given?
Politico has a piece on liberals using the same constitutional tactics against the new administration as the conservatives did against Obama's administration.
As I grow older and more cynical, I begin to think one of the virtues of the system is this encouragement of hypocrisy; surely no thinking politician can take herself entirely seriously when she has to change her
Ethics Training for White House Staff
One little factoid caught my attention which now becomes relevant: on the Sunday after Trump's inauguration the White House staff spent the afternoon getting ethics training (and probably other routine training). These sorts of required training sessions were, when I was employed, a pain in the rear. After all, I was honest, didn't discriminate based on race or disability, sex or age, etc. etc. I confess I sometimes failed to attend them, using some excuse or other.
I'm now wondering whether Kellyanne Conway, the gift who keeps on giving, attended the Sunday session or whether, like me, she thought herself too good for it, thus leading into her apparent violation of ethics standards?
I'm now wondering whether Kellyanne Conway, the gift who keeps on giving, attended the Sunday session or whether, like me, she thought herself too good for it, thus leading into her apparent violation of ethics standards?
Wednesday, February 08, 2017
RIP: Hans Rosling
An article discussing him here.
In my younger days world poverty was a big issue: could Europe and the US ensure the Third World developed fast enough, overtaking the "Population Bomb", the title of a popular book in 1968 and The Limits of Growth by the Club of Rome. Such books inculcated a mindset which I still haven't overcome (nor, I think, have most other people), as was confirmed for me by a recent quiz on world economic statistics. Anyhow, Rosling was very effective in publicizing the great improvements in world living conditions. He will be missed.
In my younger days world poverty was a big issue: could Europe and the US ensure the Third World developed fast enough, overtaking the "Population Bomb", the title of a popular book in 1968 and The Limits of Growth by the Club of Rome. Such books inculcated a mindset which I still haven't overcome (nor, I think, have most other people), as was confirmed for me by a recent quiz on world economic statistics. Anyhow, Rosling was very effective in publicizing the great improvements in world living conditions. He will be missed.
Tuesday, February 07, 2017
Dealing With Congress, Dealing With Constituents
Monday, February 06, 2017
Indoor Skydiving--It's a Thing
From Kottke. (Using a vertical wind tunnel with transparent walls.) Soon to be in the Olympics, no doubt.
Sunday, February 05, 2017
Two for One Regulation EO
I blogged earlier about Trump's Executive Order on regulations. Politico has a piece raising some other questions about the order. One is whether the President has power to govern the number of regulations--a neat question but one I'm sure lawyers can get around.
Why Small Dairies Vanish, or Turn Organic
From Modern Farmer, talking about a USDA survey of dairy farms:
The data will also be used to study the economy of scale in the dairy industry. Kings says that based on data from the 2010 ARMS, dairies with less than 50 cows had production costs twice that of dairies with 1,000 cows or more. “This cost-size relationship means that large dairies account for an increasing share of milk production and small dairies are going out of business, often as small producers reach retirement,” she says.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)