Malia Obama is off to Harvard, after a gap year. This despite her father's suggestion that a great education could be gotten at many colleges and universities, some off the beaten path.
I'm not going to fault her choice. It's true that if she had gone to Franklin Pierce College (to name a struggling college and the alma mater of Temple Grandin) she might have set an example to her peers of focusing on the essentials and disdaining reputation. But very few do that. Her parents didn't: instead of sending their daughters to DC schools like the Carters did with Amy, they chose Sidwell Friends, probably the most prestigious school in the area. So Ms. Obama is simply following her parents' example.
It's all well and good to praise community service and sacrifice, but few normal people will sacrifice themselves to the ideal, much less their children.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Tuesday, May 03, 2016
Monday, May 02, 2016
"The Great State of Alabama,...."
One of the fun things I remember from listening to political conventions (started in 48, but first I really remember was in 1952) was the roll call of the states. Each state's vote would be announced, leading off with some usually brief description of the state or the significance of the vote. Thus, the first was always the "The Great State of Alabama is proud and happy to cast its xx votes for the next Vice President of these United States, the Honorable John Sparkman..." or some such.
I'm glad the Republicans aren't going to change that tradition--at least one wise decision.
I'm glad the Republicans aren't going to change that tradition--at least one wise decision.
Sunday, May 01, 2016
What Is America--the Biggest Slave Revolt
We write as if the definition of America is self-evident, thus the adjective "American" is self-evident as well.
Not so fast. I tried, and failed, to become a professor of American history. It's a hard term to define. Is it the history of the people who live or lived in America? Sounds like a good starting point, but do we include the history of the Native Americans? Does that make them more American than Americans, or less, or different?
Maybe we just limit the term to the history of the people who lived in America after 1492? Does that exclude the Spanish who settled in Florida and the Southwest, or the French who settled in New Orleans and Louisiana? Or do we say that they only became American when the US gained sovereignty over the land, so their history begins with acquisition?
The other related question is whether there are degrees of Americanness? Asking the question brings up, for those of us of a certain age, the divisiveness of the McCarthy times. But it's a good question, at least for the way we usually write. But it often excludes such groups as Native American tribes, the Amish/Mennonite community, the Hasidic Jewish community, etc. who don't fit neatly into generalizations about American.
This post was prompted by this piece, discussing the biggest slave revolt on soil now claimed by the US.
Not so fast. I tried, and failed, to become a professor of American history. It's a hard term to define. Is it the history of the people who live or lived in America? Sounds like a good starting point, but do we include the history of the Native Americans? Does that make them more American than Americans, or less, or different?
Maybe we just limit the term to the history of the people who lived in America after 1492? Does that exclude the Spanish who settled in Florida and the Southwest, or the French who settled in New Orleans and Louisiana? Or do we say that they only became American when the US gained sovereignty over the land, so their history begins with acquisition?
The other related question is whether there are degrees of Americanness? Asking the question brings up, for those of us of a certain age, the divisiveness of the McCarthy times. But it's a good question, at least for the way we usually write. But it often excludes such groups as Native American tribes, the Amish/Mennonite community, the Hasidic Jewish community, etc. who don't fit neatly into generalizations about American.
This post was prompted by this piece, discussing the biggest slave revolt on soil now claimed by the US.
Saturday, April 30, 2016
The "Unhealthy Hegemony" of Extroverts
"More generally, the ability to focus on a
single task for an extended period is a talent that's
underappreciated—especially by extroverts, who continue to exercise an
unhealthy hegemony over most workplaces".
Kevin Drum
Kevin Drum
Friday, April 29, 2016
Gaining and Losing Employment
The Times reports that there was a decrease in tomato picker/processors in CA from 45,000 to 5,000 handling 5 times the tonnage between 1950 and now. It also reports that making Greek yogurt, specifically Chobani, has increased employment from 0 to 2,000 over the last 15 years.
And finally, FiveThirty Eight reports an increase in statistical analysts from 44 in 2099 to 156 now. The number of scouts has also increased from 124 to 153.
I'm not sure whether food processing counts as manufacturing? Given the proliferation of food products on grocery store shelves, you'd think that area at least would have seen big growth over the last 50 years.
And finally, FiveThirty Eight reports an increase in statistical analysts from 44 in 2099 to 156 now. The number of scouts has also increased from 124 to 153.
I'm not sure whether food processing counts as manufacturing? Given the proliferation of food products on grocery store shelves, you'd think that area at least would have seen big growth over the last 50 years.
Thursday, April 28, 2016
Pocahontas and Martha Washington
What do the two women share? The distinction of preceding Harriet Tubman as women on US currency.
But the Confederates honored Lucy Pickens first. And private banks had images of slaves on their bills.
But the Confederates honored Lucy Pickens first. And private banks had images of slaves on their bills.
Cyber security for Farmers?
FBI says farmers vulnerable to hacking of digitized data.
I'm not sure what the motivation would be. The piece discusses the possible theft of bulk data for use in market manipulation and such. That's possible I suppose, perhaps particularly at the state and corporation level, but I'd think it unlikely. What other motivation: ransom, as has happened with hospitals. I don't think farm-level data is that crucial or time sensitive.
I know the ag lobby has put in legal provisions requiring FSA to keep secret some data, but that's more anti-EWG measures than anything else.
Call me cynical, but the cyber-security/industrial complex has an interest in alarming everyone they can, so they can sell their services.
I'm not sure what the motivation would be. The piece discusses the possible theft of bulk data for use in market manipulation and such. That's possible I suppose, perhaps particularly at the state and corporation level, but I'd think it unlikely. What other motivation: ransom, as has happened with hospitals. I don't think farm-level data is that crucial or time sensitive.
I know the ag lobby has put in legal provisions requiring FSA to keep secret some data, but that's more anti-EWG measures than anything else.
Call me cynical, but the cyber-security/industrial complex has an interest in alarming everyone they can, so they can sell their services.
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Cover Crops
I feels as if I've mentioned this before, but anyway.
Tamar Haspel has an article in the Post on changes in "big ag", which affect the environment, such as "no-till". She focuses on cover crops, noting that sometimes they pay off financially, but often they don't. Also, farmers who rent are less motivated to use cover crops on the rented ground.
I'll quote my comment:
"Once upon a time, there was a program called the Agricultural Conservation Program. It included cost sharing for various conservation practices, including winter cover crops. Then into this idyllic picture came a President, elected by the people. This President refused to spend the money Congress appropriated for the program, thinking it was a waste of money. After much toing and froing, and a few lawsuits IIRC, Congress and the President compromise by calling the program a new name and by killing some of the conservation practices, including the cover crop practice."
The toing and froing was partly over whether the President had the authority not to spend the money. IIRC the Supreme Court eventually said no.
The President was Nixon.
Tamar Haspel has an article in the Post on changes in "big ag", which affect the environment, such as "no-till". She focuses on cover crops, noting that sometimes they pay off financially, but often they don't. Also, farmers who rent are less motivated to use cover crops on the rented ground.
I'll quote my comment:
"Once upon a time, there was a program called the Agricultural Conservation Program. It included cost sharing for various conservation practices, including winter cover crops. Then into this idyllic picture came a President, elected by the people. This President refused to spend the money Congress appropriated for the program, thinking it was a waste of money. After much toing and froing, and a few lawsuits IIRC, Congress and the President compromise by calling the program a new name and by killing some of the conservation practices, including the cover crop practice."
The toing and froing was partly over whether the President had the authority not to spend the money. IIRC the Supreme Court eventually said no.
The President was Nixon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)