The MIDAS page on the FSA website has been updated.http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/midas?area=home&subject=landing&topic=landing
I'd say it was about time. Certainly the MIDAS effort has been focused on the FSA bureaucrats, not the public.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Sunday, November 03, 2013
Friday, November 01, 2013
ACA IT and Testing
I can't resist the temptation to comment on the healthcare software process. (BTW, here's a link to their blog.)
They've taken hits for not fully testing, which I can agree with. On the other hand, remembering the test process we had for System/36 software, I can only imagine the problems they would have had. If my imagination is right, they had these choices for beginning to end testing:
They've taken hits for not fully testing, which I can agree with. On the other hand, remembering the test process we had for System/36 software, I can only imagine the problems they would have had. If my imagination is right, they had these choices for beginning to end testing:
- use live data--i.e., have all the 20-something IT types try to sign up for health insurance for real using their software. That has some obvious problems, particularly when you have to cover 36 state exchanges.
- create test data. The problem here is while you can create applicants, you need to have SS numbers which meet the SSA criteria, and/or you need to create credit histories over at Experian, then you need to tack on test data for those SSN's with IRS, etc.
- use a subset of live data for test data. That's what we used to do--get a copy of a counties files in and modify the data to create test conditions. That's very problematic, both from a security standpoint and from a Privacy Act standpoint. And our FSA system was simple compared to the sort of system ACA requires.
UK Versus US: Enclosed Farmland
An interesting piece in Buzzfeed (Hat tip: Marginal Revolution) on Britain's housing problems. But I want to steal one of its 15 graphics:
Note the "enclosed farmland" category, which basically covers most of England and Ulster, plus bits of lowlands Scotland.
Trying to find the equivalent for the US. There's this NASS map, which can get very detailed--I'd never seen it before.
And there's this map of "prime farmland".
What's important I think is that farmland in the US is much more splotchy; the UK is much more uniformly developed as either farm or urban.
Note the "enclosed farmland" category, which basically covers most of England and Ulster, plus bits of lowlands Scotland.
Trying to find the equivalent for the US. There's this NASS map, which can get very detailed--I'd never seen it before.
And there's this map of "prime farmland".
What's important I think is that farmland in the US is much more splotchy; the UK is much more uniformly developed as either farm or urban.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
The Monitor Redux: DDG 1000 Zumwalt
Via Lawyers, Guns, and Money, a piece on the launch of the new destroyer: Zumwalt, with a hull design which reminds me of the Monitor.
Apparently a complex and innovative project which came in okay. Hope it works out, but so far the DOD looks good.
Via the same source, an article on a new long-range bomber. Interesting that they're planning an unmanned version of it.
Apparently a complex and innovative project which came in okay. Hope it works out, but so far the DOD looks good.
Via the same source, an article on a new long-range bomber. Interesting that they're planning an unmanned version of it.
Funny Sentence About WWII Photo
"Landing, from what I’ve read, was considered one of the more important qualifications for a pilot."
Via Kottke, this sentence is from a piece on the "most honored [US]photograph" of WWII, taken by a "nutty crew".
Anyone who has the slightest interest in military history and/or heroism should read it.
Via Kottke, this sentence is from a piece on the "most honored [US]photograph" of WWII, taken by a "nutty crew".
Anyone who has the slightest interest in military history and/or heroism should read it.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Words To Design By
From a TPM post on Kentucky's ACA IT system:
"From a design standpoint, Kentucky made the conscious choice to stick to the basics, rather than seeking to blow users away with a state-of-the-art consumer interface. A big part of that was knowing their demographics: A simpler site would make it easer to access for people without broadband Internet access, and the content was written at a sixth-grade reading level so it would be as easy to understand as possible.
"We wanted it to have a branded feel, but that was not the most important part," said Gwenda Bond, an exchange spokesperson. "The most important part was that it works. I think a lot of people would say that simplicity is good website design."
Monday, October 28, 2013
West Virginia, Farm Bill, and Food Stamps
The Post had an article on how West Virginia has changed from a bastion of Democracy to a state shortly to be dominated by Republicans. In it, they mentioned that JFK's first executive order included a reactivation of a pilot food stamp program. This morning Farm Policy discusses the conference committee on the farm bill with the food stamp program being the top issue.
A couple thoughts:
A couple thoughts:
- even in 1960, black poverty was mostly invisible. Civil rights issues sucked all the air out of the room, leaving little room to consider other issues. So the poverty in the Appalachian region was a big focus. Not only did JFK do the food thing, he also got legislation creating an Appalachian Regional authority, covering parts of 13 states. The idea was a pale imitation of the TVA, trying to coordinate federal programs to help the area (which included my home county).
- the references to "food stamp program" are a bit misleading. Beginning in the 1930's the Feds distributed surplus commodities to the needy. In 1939 there was a brief attempt at food stamps--allowing the needy to buy stamps which could be used only to purchase food. But I believe that program died with WWII. The surplus distribution more or less continued. (I'm not sure, but I think schools, Indian tribes, and foreign countries all got surplus food in Ike's administration, along with some of the poor.
- JFK's order really started a new food stamp pilot project, which worked okay and got legislated in 1964. I believe, without checking, that Sen. McGovern was a major force behind it. By 1964 the Harrington book on Poverty in America was making an impact; awareness of poverty among blacks was growing, but it still wasn't as racially centered as it seems today. (Used to be, and probably still is, that the majority or at least plurality of food stamp recipients were white.) That's perhaps why some West Virginians discount the importance of SNAP; the program seems part of the landscape and no longer seems an effort by Dems to help WV whites.
- the problems with distributing surplus food to the food are somewhat similar to foreign aid (PL-480)--you have to establish channels to ship the food to the right destination and the available surpluses aren't necessarily what is most needed by the recipients. So food stamps for the poor were similar to today's ideas of "monetarization" of food aid.
- food stamps used to be sold, so you'd get $10 face value of stamps for $x in cash. The idea was to expand the poor's spending on food. As the program has evolved, that element faded away.
Friday, October 25, 2013
Farm Bill Time Again
The House and Senate conferees will meet next week on the farm bill. The Rural Blog passes on speculation about possible effects on FSA offices.
I wonder whether FSA employees are comparing the rollout of MIDAS (which seems to have had problems, though not very visible outside the walls of FSA) with the rollout of ACA.
I wonder whether FSA employees are comparing the rollout of MIDAS (which seems to have had problems, though not very visible outside the walls of FSA) with the rollout of ACA.
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Software Problems
There seem to be many experts who are diagnosing the problems with the ACA online system. I'm not going to join their ranks--I'm no expert. I expect only those on the inside, and only some of those, know really what has gone wrong and how hard or easy it will be to fix.
The one thing I will say (immediately contradicting the paragraph above) is that they shouldn't have changed the design to put establishing an account first, instead of putting it at the end. The problem seems likely to have been the change. It apparently was too late in the day to make it; they should have kept on with the general design they started with. That raises the question of whether they had buy-in on the system design from everyone, by which I mean Tavenner, Sebelius, OMB, and the President, well in advance.
The closest I've ever come to this sort of problem was the 1983 payment-in-kind program, in which the Reagan administration strongarmed the lawyers into a tricky device to swap CCC-owned grain for acreage reductions, a program which I remember as being slapped together in about 2 weeks (though memory is probably fallible). The Secretary had the Under Secretary ramrodding the implementation, because it was a high risk endeavor, and he had regular (daily?) meetings with the peons who were doing the scutwork.
The one thing I will say (immediately contradicting the paragraph above) is that they shouldn't have changed the design to put establishing an account first, instead of putting it at the end. The problem seems likely to have been the change. It apparently was too late in the day to make it; they should have kept on with the general design they started with. That raises the question of whether they had buy-in on the system design from everyone, by which I mean Tavenner, Sebelius, OMB, and the President, well in advance.
The closest I've ever come to this sort of problem was the 1983 payment-in-kind program, in which the Reagan administration strongarmed the lawyers into a tricky device to swap CCC-owned grain for acreage reductions, a program which I remember as being slapped together in about 2 weeks (though memory is probably fallible). The Secretary had the Under Secretary ramrodding the implementation, because it was a high risk endeavor, and he had regular (daily?) meetings with the peons who were doing the scutwork.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Found--an Honest Blogger
Diogenes may still be looking for an honest man, but I've found an honest blogger--Kevin Drum, in a post on post-shutdown polls:
(Returned from a 5-day trip to NY which explains the hiatus.)
I don't want to beat a dead horse, but — oh, who am I kidding? I love beating this particular dead horse.
(Returned from a 5-day trip to NY which explains the hiatus.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)