“‘Because we are a nation that hasn’t really experienced food shortages in recent memory, folks forget the role that [farmers] play on a lot of different levels,’ said Mike Torrey, executive vice president of Crop Insurance and Reinsurance Bureau, a lobbying group for the crop insurance industry.”My bottom line: the controlling factor is our land and climate. Whether we have 9 million 40 acre farms or 90,000 4,000 acre farms we're going to have enough food, Mother Nature willing. I think farm programs and crop insurance work mostly to modify the churn, the "creative destruction" which is found in the farm economy. Despite all the government interventions, at bottom crops are commodities produced and sold in relatively free markets where usually the buyers have lots more market power than the sellers.
Got me wondering: when was the last time we had food scarcity in the U.S.? I mean something serious, not just a price spike. I don't think ever, though maybe back in 1816, when I remember it was the year without a summer. (My memory for long ago times is good.)
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
Food Shortages in the U.S.?
Farm Policy carried this quote:
Monday, December 05, 2011
Using Measurements on Social Media
This week's report: USDA had 52,122 followers, 1 inquiry, 1 answer.
I very much like the idea of measuring what you're trying to do. Of course, extending myself to blogging seems have been a bridge just far enough, going to Facebook or Twitter is something I just haven't done. With no first hand experience, it follow that I'm in a poor position to give advice, not that that stops me.
I'm not sure what Twitter can do for USDA, but it seems to me the metric above suggests trying something different. If I were dictator for a day, maybe I'd offer a $5000 prize for the county employee who made the most innovative use of Twitter for FSA operations over the course of a year. Not sure how it would be measured, but I'm sure someone could figure it out.
I very much like the idea of measuring what you're trying to do. Of course, extending myself to blogging seems have been a bridge just far enough, going to Facebook or Twitter is something I just haven't done. With no first hand experience, it follow that I'm in a poor position to give advice, not that that stops me.
I'm not sure what Twitter can do for USDA, but it seems to me the metric above suggests trying something different. If I were dictator for a day, maybe I'd offer a $5000 prize for the county employee who made the most innovative use of Twitter for FSA operations over the course of a year. Not sure how it would be measured, but I'm sure someone could figure it out.
Doctor: What Would You Choose To Do for Yourself?
First We Kill All the Lawyers; and Make the World Happier
In two ways: the rest of us have no lawyers to deal with and we lose a bunch of people who are so depressed they bring down the happiness curve for the rest of us. From here--the logic of the research is that lawyers are pessimists, always worrying about what could go wrong.
80,000 Square Yards
The headline on the Treehugger post is: "
Paris to Plant 80,000 Square Yards of Green Roofs and Rooftop Gardens by 2020
That converts to 16.528 acres, which might could provide food for maybe, oh I don't know, 100? gai Parisiennes?
(To give them their due, the actual article doesn't talk about food, but insulation. But this is a prime example of how to lie with statistics; of course if they'd used square feet the figure would be even more impressive.)
Paris to Plant 80,000 Square Yards of Green Roofs and Rooftop Gardens by 2020
That converts to 16.528 acres, which might could provide food for maybe, oh I don't know, 100? gai Parisiennes?
(To give them their due, the actual article doesn't talk about food, but insulation. But this is a prime example of how to lie with statistics; of course if they'd used square feet the figure would be even more impressive.)
Sunday, December 04, 2011
On the Virtues of Patience
Musings from a Stonehead explains what's needed to capture a moment on film.
From a different post, just as an indicator it's worth clicking through to the site.
From a different post, just as an indicator it's worth clicking through to the site.
Who Remembers the Flight Engineer? Whither the Pilot
Used to be a job, but no more. See this Hanson pickup of a story on automated flight.
Saturday, December 03, 2011
EU Farmers and Farm Programs
A picture of EU agriculture from this (the context is the proper relationship between payments for grassland and payments for croplant):
It is about farmers who are farmers just to obtain subsidies and who fulfil their income goals only by subsidies. Perhaps, they have a few animals, although an increasing number of them only own grassland. From the agronomic point of view, this is intolerable, as the cultivation of hay for selling is not considered economically viable. In Slovenia, there are more than a quarter of agricultural holdings with grassland but no animals, but they apply for direct payments. Among them, there are less and less farmers and more and more mere land owners, who will have an increasing interest in the expansion of land, which they would rent out and if nothing else, split the subsidies with a tenant.
Why Do Farms Grow Bigger?
The University of Illinois reports on levels of debt and machinery costs, which says farmers are investing but not overextending. But one chart caught my eye: it's a graph showing the per acre debt/machinery costs by farm size. The curve descends, slowly but steadily. In other words, the bigger the farm, the more acres you can spread the cost of equipment over. What a surprise.
Government Contracting
For many years I lived blissfully without having any dealings with government contractors. Basically ASCS was, at least as far as I knew, all its work using its own employees. So it was an eye-opener in the late 80's when I started to run into government contracting, partly on the System/36 replacement project and a bit later on the Info Share project.
At least in my memory, the contractors were uniformly 8a firms, meaning their ownership was minority, women, disabled, with bigger outfits like Boeing and SAIC as their subcontractors. That seems to have continued with recent FSA projects.
Here's a govloop post from a disgruntled subcontractor (no relationship to USDA) which gives another side of the picture. Essentially the story is that the prime contractor systematically screwed the sub. Don't know whether it's true or not, don't know whether the government agency was satisfied with the performance under the contract, but it sure doesn't increase my faith in the use of contractors.
At least in my memory, the contractors were uniformly 8a firms, meaning their ownership was minority, women, disabled, with bigger outfits like Boeing and SAIC as their subcontractors. That seems to have continued with recent FSA projects.
Here's a govloop post from a disgruntled subcontractor (no relationship to USDA) which gives another side of the picture. Essentially the story is that the prime contractor systematically screwed the sub. Don't know whether it's true or not, don't know whether the government agency was satisfied with the performance under the contract, but it sure doesn't increase my faith in the use of contractors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)