Lerner also said the standard penalty dictated by the Hatch Act — termination of employment — is too harsh in most instances and may even encourage agencies not to report violationI'm too lazy to research, but if memory serves the ASCS employees in the 1990's were found guilty of violating the Hatch Act and paid $1,000 fines, but didn't lose their jobs. One of them solicited me for money on the phone during work hours, not that I was ever asked to testify nor did I volunteer the information. Since the Dems were in power and the solicitation was on behalf of a bundling organization giving to Clinton, I doubt the agency reported the violation. I think we can thank a whistleblower.
Friday, October 07, 2011
Hatch Act Violations and FSA
A Politico piece on proposals to change the Hatch Act says:
Sen McCaskill and MIDAS?
The Alaskan Native Corporation act permits Bering Straits to be the prime contractor for MIDAS. Another ANC corporation has just been tarnished by the indictment of one of its officials in a contracting scandal. Federal Computer Week has an article on whether other corporations will be tarred with the same brush, including this comment:
"The Alaska Native Corporations should compete for these large contracts and further should not be allowed to ‘front’ for other corporations that are actually doing the work,” McCaskill said in her statement.
Thursday, October 06, 2011
I Was Wrong--Palin
No Flowers for Gates?
Turns out people have left flowers at the Apple store in Reston. I don't expect Bill Gates to have flowers left when he dies: first there's no Microsoft stores; second he never established the personal connection that Jobs did. But I do expect ambassadors and other figures from various countries to express their condolences. Jobs never did charity; Gates is, and is making a difference. To me that makes him a bigger man.
Sen. Lugar Is Heard From
Via FarmPolicy, here's an analysis of Senator Lugar's plan to put FSA mostly out of business (tongue in cheek). Centerpiece seems to be a version of the ARRM I blogged previously, plus cutting CRP, consolidating other programs and some other stuff I can't follow. But here's a command: "This section directs the Secretary to create a simplified form for initial requests by producers for
assistance. This section also directs the Secretary to evaluate how all conservation application
materials can be streamlined to make it easier for producers to apply to one or more programs."
[Updated by adding all the language after "previously".]
assistance. This section also directs the Secretary to evaluate how all conservation application
materials can be streamlined to make it easier for producers to apply to one or more programs."
[Updated by adding all the language after "previously".]
Wednesday, October 05, 2011
A Hole in the Crop Insurance Safety Net
FarmDocDaily has a post pointing out a hole in crop insurance as a one-stop, do-it-all safety net: periods when crop prices are low for multiple years (mid 80's, late 90's). (His graph misled me, because it compares the 5-year average price with the projected price used for setting crop insurance. I believe the actual price for the year would show more variability.) Of course, in such years the political pressure becomes such that Congress will do something to patch the hole; at least, that's been the experience in the past but whether it works that way in the context of large deficits is another question.
On Line Education
Margaret Soltan at University Diaries has a major vendetta against on-line education, as well as laptops in class, Powerpoint, etc., all positions you might expect of a humanities professor at GWU. In my younger days I used to be an early adapter, so the idea of online education makes a lot of sense to me. So I'm torn.
Matt Yglesias came out with a good post which strikes to the heart of the problem of online education, but I'll link to Kevin Drum's commentary/excerpting of it. The problem is, of course, almost no one is self-motivated enough to do online education.
I think there's a simple solution to that problem: your online university requires the student to deposit a total fee, say 50 percent of the cost of an in-person education, or $50,000, whichever is smaller. Then, as the online student completes courses and passes tests, she gets a refund of part of the deposit..
Problem solved.
Matt Yglesias came out with a good post which strikes to the heart of the problem of online education, but I'll link to Kevin Drum's commentary/excerpting of it. The problem is, of course, almost no one is self-motivated enough to do online education.
I think there's a simple solution to that problem: your online university requires the student to deposit a total fee, say 50 percent of the cost of an in-person education, or $50,000, whichever is smaller. Then, as the online student completes courses and passes tests, she gets a refund of part of the deposit..
Problem solved.
Tuesday, October 04, 2011
Harvest Time at the White House
Apparently today is harvest time for the White House garden. Either I've not kept up, Obamafoodorama hasn't kept up, or the White House hasn't been publicizing it, but I've lost track of what they're growing. According to today's post, sweet potatoes.
In our own garden the tomatoes are done, cleaned up the rest of the vines this morning (early blight is a problem so the vines go out in the trash, not back into the ground. We don't grow sweet potatoes, though we like them well enough. The fall vegetables have been in the ground for a good well: lettuce and brassicas.
Back to the White House garden--if I remember correctly next spring they can claim to be organic, since the land has been free of chemicals for 3 years next March.
[Updated: Apparently in June they were planting the three sisters of Native Americans, corn, beans, and squash--that's from a link in the post above.]
In our own garden the tomatoes are done, cleaned up the rest of the vines this morning (early blight is a problem so the vines go out in the trash, not back into the ground. We don't grow sweet potatoes, though we like them well enough. The fall vegetables have been in the ground for a good well: lettuce and brassicas.
Back to the White House garden--if I remember correctly next spring they can claim to be organic, since the land has been free of chemicals for 3 years next March.
[Updated: Apparently in June they were planting the three sisters of Native Americans, corn, beans, and squash--that's from a link in the post above.]
What Is the Proper Role of the Bureaucrat?
The NYTimes has an article discussing the pipeline being proposed to run across Canada and much of the US. The pipeline opponents believe that a bureaucrat in the State Department was inappropriately helping a lobbyist for the pipeline, who had a political connection to Clinton. It raises for me the question of what is the proper role of a bureaucrat:
There's also the question of different personalities: some people are effusive and outgoing, others (the better ones I say with total bias) are reserved and taciturn.
It's often difficult to judge a bureaucrat's behavior fairly without seeing a lot of their interactions with clients/customers.
- the neutral arbiter of the rules, enforcing them as best you can, rather like an umpire in a baseball game?
- the advocate for the cause, like the Army Chief of Staff for the army?
- the helpful postal clerk, who attempts to guide the aged customer with an odd package through his options?
- the social worker, encouraging the client to do the right thing?
- the FBI agent, enforcing the law?
There's also the question of different personalities: some people are effusive and outgoing, others (the better ones I say with total bias) are reserved and taciturn.
It's often difficult to judge a bureaucrat's behavior fairly without seeing a lot of their interactions with clients/customers.
Those Underpaid CEO's
The Post today reveals the nation-wide shortfall in CEO pay: it seems at least half the CEO's in America are underpaid, failing to make the median income.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)