Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Founding Fathers Had Imperfect Foresight
According to Rep. Duncan Hunter,(in a Grist post) when writing the Constitution the founders envisioned automobiles, but not bicycles.
Pigford II Website
Per an FSA notice, the website for Pigford II claims is blackfarmercase.com.
It has two bolded statements:
: No payments can be made to any claimants under the Settlement until all claims have been determined. That means that it could be 2-3 years before successful claimants receive any payments. Please be patient.
Please note: You do not need to pay money to any individual, farm advocacy group, or law firm to participate in the Settlement.
It has two bolded statements:
: No payments can be made to any claimants under the Settlement until all claims have been determined. That means that it could be 2-3 years before successful claimants receive any payments. Please be patient.
Please note: You do not need to pay money to any individual, farm advocacy group, or law firm to participate in the Settlement.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Powerline Loses Most of Its Common Sense
You can divide the world into two: people who drive you up the wall and people who don't. The Powerline blog is one of the few right wing blogs I follow, just to see what's going on and try to keep from freezing into intellectual ice. John (Hinderaker) at Powerline drives me up the wall. One of these years I'll do a compilation of his comments which seem to me to be unwise. Paul (Mirengoff)[corrected] doesn't drive me up the wall, though usually I disagree with his comments. Scott (Johnson) also doesn't drive me up the wall. Today Paul announced he was ceasing blogging. Too bad.
{Updated: apparently Paul ran into trouble at his law firm over his response to the Giffords events. See TPM. ]
{Updated: apparently Paul ran into trouble at his law firm over his response to the Giffords events. See TPM. ]
Stealing a Comment on Cats
From Ta-Nahesi Coates blog, his free-for-all comment thread:
by anibundel:
Instead of stealing it I really (cross my heart) would have linked to it, if I could figure out how to in Disqus
by anibundel:
Today in felines:
There are people coming over. The cats don't actually know that. What they know is the following:
The vacuum monster ate the cat hair they so lovingly placed all over the stairs. It was traumatic.
They were given cat nip.
Roomba came out to play, give kitty rides and generally be undaunted by being pounced at.
Their favorite couch blankets all mysteriously disappeared, giving them free reign to shed on the couch proper.
There was bacon for stealing. There were latkes to sniff and generally be confused by before being swatted down from the counters. There were treats.
They then considered the concept of out-of-doors, but after one paw was placed outside by the bravest, and the snow sniffed suspiciously and then horror-of-horrors, gotten on her nose, there was general consensus that this was a Bad Idea, and cat condos were retreated to.
Currently cat toys are being cuddled, and general uproar seems to have died down.
Instead of stealing it I really (cross my heart) would have linked to it, if I could figure out how to in Disqus
Sugar Is Dead
Chris Clayton reports that Sens. Shaheen (D) and Kirk (R) are moving to abolish the sugar program. As they represent the centrists, and Tea Partiers have already said they don't want sugar with their tea, the tide is against sugar in the Senate. However, look for Sens. Nelson(D) and Rubio (R) to join forces with Sens. Landrieu (D) and Vitter (R) in the fight to sustain the program.
[Updated: not to mention lobbying by American Crystal Sugar, a co-op of MN sugar growers, which spends as much lobbying Congress as Cargill does. Via FarmPolicy. ]
[Updated: not to mention lobbying by American Crystal Sugar, a co-op of MN sugar growers, which spends as much lobbying Congress as Cargill does. Via FarmPolicy. ]
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Negative Things Are True: Payments to the Dead
This Barking Up the Wrong Tree post talks about a study showing humans are more likely to believe the negative to be true. It comes on the same day as FSA reports that almost all its payments to dead people are valid.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Tea Party Budget Proposals
From Rep. Bachmann:
From Rand Paul:
The following agencies are defunded: ARS, FAS, NRCS (the text says "Resource Conservation Service, so I assume he's trying for NRCS), National Institute of Food and Agriculture. FS is cut by $1.178 billion, the remaining agencies are cut pro rata by $42.542 billion.
Sen. Paul presents the text of a bill (S.162) but it's not in the sort of detail any serious effort would need. For example, the legislation on farm programs would need to amend existing legislation. It's perhaps representative of the deep thought which has gone into his proposal that the first page completely defunds the Government Printing Office, this on a bill printed by GPO. No explanation of how Congress will do its business without GPO.
$20 Billion Replace farm subsidies with farmer savings accounts, eliminating the Foreign Agriculture Service, merging and trimming budget of four agriculture outreach and research agencies, and funding the Food Safety and Inspection Service with user fees.Note: I don't know how she gets the $20 billion or how much money the farmer savings accounts would get (unless it's just a 401k with no federal matching(.
From Rand Paul:
The following agencies are defunded: ARS, FAS, NRCS (the text says "Resource Conservation Service, so I assume he's trying for NRCS), National Institute of Food and Agriculture. FS is cut by $1.178 billion, the remaining agencies are cut pro rata by $42.542 billion.
Sen. Paul presents the text of a bill (S.162) but it's not in the sort of detail any serious effort would need. For example, the legislation on farm programs would need to amend existing legislation. It's perhaps representative of the deep thought which has gone into his proposal that the first page completely defunds the Government Printing Office, this on a bill printed by GPO. No explanation of how Congress will do its business without GPO.
How To Reorganize
So Obama proposed reorganizing government last night. But by focusing on duplicated functions he implies the sort of reorganization which takes some silos and puts the silos together under one roof. For example, taking Rural Housing and putting it under HUD, or Forest Service and combining it with Interior. That's the sort of reorganization FSA experienced in 1994, when parts of the old Farmers Home Administration were combined with ASCS. I'm not sure the reorganization has been terribly successful; it wasn't successful quickly. We still have county office employees who are Federal and those who are not. 16 years of effort hasn't changed that. And I suspect we still have IT employees in St. Louis and IT employees in Kansas City. And the IT applications may not have been as integrated as they might be, as were dreamed of in 1991 under Info Share.
I'd like to suggest a different model for reorganization, particularly for rural areas. It's a model which will drive some FSA employees, particularly a certain CED, up the wall, but I think it's worth considering and testing.
Some assumptions:
The new model field office works with the new model Federal agency, which tries to serve the public online, but using experts more locally based as intermediaries for those who aren't comfortable with technology. So the new model Federal agency is doing lots of basic training of the personnel in the
So you set up the new model field office and test it. If it works, it's the field service center for all Federal government services and some new ones. (The new ones will aggravate people who might think I'm a socialist.) So the new office would start by serving as a post office and a passport office (which some post offices do now). It would serve FSA programs, NRCS programs, Rural Development programs. It would handle Social Security matters. It would handle IRS matters. It could serve as an interface for remote medicine.
That's my idea.
I'd like to suggest a different model for reorganization, particularly for rural areas. It's a model which will drive some FSA employees, particularly a certain CED, up the wall, but I think it's worth considering and testing.
Some assumptions:
- The number of farms in agricultural areas continues to fall
- The number of people in some rural areas continues to fall
- Technology permits telework to be effective in some cases
- Many people in rural areas are competent with modern technology, but some are not.
The new model field office works with the new model Federal agency, which tries to serve the public online, but using experts more locally based as intermediaries for those who aren't comfortable with technology. So the new model Federal agency is doing lots of basic training of the personnel in the
So you set up the new model field office and test it. If it works, it's the field service center for all Federal government services and some new ones. (The new ones will aggravate people who might think I'm a socialist.) So the new office would start by serving as a post office and a passport office (which some post offices do now). It would serve FSA programs, NRCS programs, Rural Development programs. It would handle Social Security matters. It would handle IRS matters. It could serve as an interface for remote medicine.
That's my idea.
Are the Conservatives Right on Healthcare?
One of the major arguments people like Megan McArdle use against the healthcare reform passed last year is that the cost-saving measures included in the plan won't work. People like Ezra Klein and Matt Yglesias say they will work, they hope.
This Politico article provides ammunition for the conservatives. Various interest groups and lobbyists are rising up against the Independent Payment Advisory Board. If one is a cynic, watch for the lobbyists to get legislation weakening it or killing it included in some big package of must-pass legislation.
This Politico article provides ammunition for the conservatives. Various interest groups and lobbyists are rising up against the Independent Payment Advisory Board. If one is a cynic, watch for the lobbyists to get legislation weakening it or killing it included in some big package of must-pass legislation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)