This disparity could explain why corporations
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Is Your Work Worth $1.2 Million?
That's what law firm partners in DC bill, $600 an hour according to Orin Kerr at Volokh passing on a study. I'm giving them a break by saying they only bill 2,000 hours a year. (Indeed, one commenter says they can bill 5,000 hours easily.) I'm not sure what a government lawyer gets, but it can't be more than 15 percent of that.
This disparity could explain why corporationsalways sometimes outmaneuver the federal government. What it doesn't explain, indeed it aggravates the mystery, is why the right claims federal government employees are so vastly overpaid.
This disparity could explain why corporations
Saturday, September 11, 2010
How Smart Phones Will Drive Down Healthcare Costs
I think it's reasonable to say we're only just realizing how much of a game changer the smart phone can be. By combining computer, camera, sound, and Internet in one small package it opens up new possibilities. One of them seems to be health care. Federal Computer Weekly has posts on using smart phones for general outreach, for remote dermatology and for mental health. Now much of this is probably boys with toys seeing nails everywhere to use their new hammers on, but out of many ideas will come some worthwhile innovations.
Obviously one of the big holdbacks for this is geezerdom: us old folks who haven't bought a smart phone yet and who generally are technologically backward. What's worse is there's probably a high correlation between lack of adoption and iffy health. (Though maybe not, I think I remember seeing that adoption of cell phones is higher among minorities. So maybe it's the old WASP geezers in the hills of Appalachia like those I grew up amongst who are most resistant.)
One of the big advantages would be outsourcing the emergency room. See Megan McArdle's post I referenced here.
Obviously one of the big holdbacks for this is geezerdom: us old folks who haven't bought a smart phone yet and who generally are technologically backward. What's worse is there's probably a high correlation between lack of adoption and iffy health. (Though maybe not, I think I remember seeing that adoption of cell phones is higher among minorities. So maybe it's the old WASP geezers in the hills of Appalachia like those I grew up amongst who are most resistant.)
One of the big advantages would be outsourcing the emergency room. See Megan McArdle's post I referenced here.
Sugar Alert: Cuteness Ahead
What's cuter than a red-headed kid? How about threered-headed kids? What's cuter than three red-headed kids? How about a kitten? What's cuter than one kitten? How about several kittens? What's cuter than several kitttens? How about several kittens and red-headed kids?
Organic Growth in Bricks and Mortar
Organic Valley, an organic cooperative, is expanding its headquarters. Hype is easy, bricks and mortar are hard.
Friday, September 10, 2010
Government Shutdowns--Memories of the Last One
Bloggers and others are starting to pay attention to the possibility that, with the Republicans winning the House and maybe the Senate in November, the next step would be a government shutdown based on a fight between the Reps and the President over budget issues.
I was still working during the shutdowns when Clinton and Gingrich faced off, riding a vanpool in from Reston. As it turned out, the pool included a mixture. Some people always went to work. My memory is vague, but I think one guy worked for a section of the Agricultural Marketing Service which was funded by fees, so the lack of appropriations bills had no impact on him. Then there were several different appropriations bills being considered under different time schedules. I think Justice got funded pretty quickly; Newt decided that cutting off funds for prisons and law enforcement wasn't good politics and I think one of our riders worked for DOJ. The rest of the pool came back to work in a couple of phases, USDA was deemed more essential than some other people (maybe Interior).
Shutting down the government always makes for interesting theater and politics.
I was still working during the shutdowns when Clinton and Gingrich faced off, riding a vanpool in from Reston. As it turned out, the pool included a mixture. Some people always went to work. My memory is vague, but I think one guy worked for a section of the Agricultural Marketing Service which was funded by fees, so the lack of appropriations bills had no impact on him. Then there were several different appropriations bills being considered under different time schedules. I think Justice got funded pretty quickly; Newt decided that cutting off funds for prisons and law enforcement wasn't good politics and I think one of our riders worked for DOJ. The rest of the pool came back to work in a couple of phases, USDA was deemed more essential than some other people (maybe Interior).
Shutting down the government always makes for interesting theater and politics.
Bureaucracy and Innovation
Watched Tora Tora Tora the other night from Netflix. It's a reminder of the problems of bureaucracy and innovation.
For bureaucracy, although Naval Intelligence had broken the Japanese diplomatic code, which led Gen. Marshall to send a telegram to all Pacific posts, the military communications link to Hawaii was out, not having been upgraded to be as reliable as commercial telegraphy, so the telegram went commercial, which delayed receipt.
For innovation, the problems in establishing the standard operating procedures for the new radar installation and its supporting communications and analysis structure. It's easier to innovate than to integrate the new into the existing structures.
For bureaucracy, although Naval Intelligence had broken the Japanese diplomatic code, which led Gen. Marshall to send a telegram to all Pacific posts, the military communications link to Hawaii was out, not having been upgraded to be as reliable as commercial telegraphy, so the telegram went commercial, which delayed receipt.
For innovation, the problems in establishing the standard operating procedures for the new radar installation and its supporting communications and analysis structure. It's easier to innovate than to integrate the new into the existing structures.
Burning the Pope in Effigy
Some of my ancestors came from Ulster, where lives the Orange Order. One of the tenets of the Orange Order was an unremitting fight against Popery. So this post in Religion in American History, recalling a little-known order of General Washington, condemning the burning of the Pope in effigy, was interesting to me. (The context: early in the Revolution its leaders hoped to get Canada, i.e., Quebec, to join the rebellion.)
Thursday, September 09, 2010
The Growth of Government
Calculated Risk provides graphs which show exactly how greatly government has expanded since 1976, as expressed in terms of employment as a percent of total employment. This is partial followon to a post at Econbrowser. (I'll give the commenters who expressed disbelief one valid point: contractors are excluded from the statistics.
Hollywood and Title Inflation
One of the things people like Paul Light find is the inflation of bureaucratic titles in DC. Secretary Gates has promised to cut the number of Deputy Assistant Secretaries in DOD. Wife and I saw The American (we like George Clooney and Italian scenery) today. I was amused to see a number of credits along the lines of "second second assistant director".
We Don't Know Him
Ruth Marcus has an op-ed commenting on Haley Barbour's comments on Obama, the one where he said: we know the least about him of any President. She correctly says: the point is, we don't know anyone like Obama. I'd expand that--he doesn't fit into familiar narratives. For past Presidents, we have a handy label/narrative we can apply: GWBush, frat boy cheerleader; Clinton, fat boy band leader with alcoholic stepfather; GWHBush, WASP aristo; Reagan, frat boy with alcoholic father; Carter, engineer nerd peanut farmer; etc. etc
We recognize these stereotypes/narratives don't represent the whole man; they're unfair. But I suspect partisans on both sides would agree there's a key element of truth in them. They give us a handle on the reality. With Obama the anti people are reacting as I did with Reagan (my person label for him was the "senior idiot").
We recognize these stereotypes/narratives don't represent the whole man; they're unfair. But I suspect partisans on both sides would agree there's a key element of truth in them. They give us a handle on the reality. With Obama the anti people are reacting as I did with Reagan (my person label for him was the "senior idiot").
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)