In the controversy over when to have mammographs, there's costs.
Ezra Klein has my thought published before I got around to it: if testing at 40 is good, then why not test at 30, and twice a year rather than yearly? Surely the point is that there's a continuum, for any person, and for the community generally. That is, testing identifies cancers which would not be otherwise identified until too late to treat effectively and permits their effective treatment. At some point on the continuum most everyone agrees testing is warranted and at another point it's not. Same sort of thing men face with prostate cancer, though I gather from the first link there might be a more straight-forward link between a positive test and treatment.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
On the Mystery of the Male Anatomy
I enjoy Joel Acehenbach's writing in the Post, and he points to a post on the Scientific American blog explaining the whys and wherefores of the male genitalia.
I Predicted This--ARRA Transparency as Omen of the Future
As I said here, despite problems with data, Obama's effort to provide transparency on stimulus spending is important, not just for itself, but in laying down the tracks for future efforts: From Nextgov:
"Technology that states have deployed to report how they spent federal stimulus funds is likely to permanently change information exchange across the public and private sector, despite controversy over figures on the number of jobs created and saved, said New York officials, academics and federal leaders."
Monday, November 23, 2009
Damn Bureaucrats Can't Get Things Right
This time it's not the government, it's Fox News bureaucrats.
I'm sure it's not a conspiracy by liberal spies to undermine the good reputation of the network. It's just Murphy's law at work. And Murphy was and is nonpartisan.
I'm sure it's not a conspiracy by liberal spies to undermine the good reputation of the network. It's just Murphy's law at work. And Murphy was and is nonpartisan.
Disaster and Obama
Farm Policy for today notes an effort in the Delta states to do disaster payments. If I remember somewhere sometime the Obama administration was proposing a multi-year fund to handle disasters. They were trying to avoid emergency appropriations bills. Don't remember if agriculture was included or, like other of their proposals, it never went anywhere.
Housing Sales Revive?
Just judging by my cluster--my next door neighbor's house is now under contract, after having been on the market maybe 30-45 days. That's much better than a year ago. Don't know if they got their asking price ($277,000), but if they did the owner made a profit. I think the bank repossessed it around Jan. 2008, someone in the city picked it up for about $180,000, rented it for a year to college students, then spent a lot of money fixing it up. So he perhaps made $50-60,000 on his investment.
Prices in the area seem, according to zillow, to be bimodal--a bunch of houses below $200K and some now selling for $275K.
Prices in the area seem, according to zillow, to be bimodal--a bunch of houses below $200K and some now selling for $275K.
Update on White House Garden
Obamafoodorama tries to keep it real, saying the White House garden (nor the beehive) won't be feeding the Indian PM at the state dinner.
I think they could be growing more--turnips and rutabagas, kale and collards, but I give the site props for honesty.
The Kitchen Garden is currently wintering over, and not producing enough vegetables to feed hundreds of guests a multi-course vegetable-based State Dinner; the photo of the garden, above, was taken yesterday afternoon. It's a little barren. There's still some lettuces, some spinach, and a variety of herbs growing, but that's pretty much it at the moment.
I think they could be growing more--turnips and rutabagas, kale and collards, but I give the site props for honesty.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Milbank Explains the Filibuster
Dana Milbank uses Tennessee Williams to describe the debate and vote on cloture last night. In doing so, he also describes the reason for the Senate rules on cloture, i.e., why the filibuster is effective:
Landrieu and Lincoln got the attention because they were the last to decide, but the Senate really has 100 Blanche DuBoises, a full house of characters inclined toward the narcissistic. The health-care debate was worse than most. With all 40 Republicans in lockstep opposition, all 60 members of the Democratic caucus had to vote yes -- and that gave each one an opportunity to extract concessions from Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid.Bottom line is that Senators never want to give up power and the filibuster gives power.
Asian Brains
From Google's competition for programmers:
Last year's champion, Lou Tiancheng of China, code-named ACRush, once again took top honors and the $5,000 grand prize. Qi Zichao of China won second place, and Iwata Yoichi of Japan came in third.
The Corn Genome
The good people at USDA (plus a bunch of egghead types) have deciphered the corn genome.
Down the road this is important.
Down the road this is important.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)