I wonder why he has the support of so many agricultural leaders when his economic team and foreign policy team are so weak?
I suspect a mixture of these things are operating:
- Trump couldn't care less about agriculture, so there's little need for the team and Trump to agree on issues. Trump can rubber stamp almost anything they come up with. In contrast Trump has positions on foreign affairs and economics which turn off a lot of the "establishment".
- rural areas are strongly pro-Trump, so the ag team represents catering to their interests. The picture's not so clear when it comes to other areas
- academics are less important to the ag establishment than they are in the other areas. Like economics, the ag team doesn't seem to have many academics.
- ag leaders on the team are either less interested in free trade and immigration than those not on the team, or they figure they might be stuck with Trump as president and it's worth it to gain positions where they can affect policy (because they know a Trump presidency isn't going to pay much attention to agriculture.
- Something completely different. :-)