That's convincing, isn't it?
But apply Occam's Razor. Which is simpler:
- There was no evidence of evil intent and two men of different political parties came independently to that conclusion.
- There was evidence of evil intent, Obama corruptly said there wasn't, Comey ran an investigation using FBI agents, usually considered conservative which was really just for show, made sure he didn't find any smoking gun evidence, and agreed with Obama.
The second alternative is simpler only if you believe in Clinton's guilt from the beginning.