But Watts — once a symbol of urban strife and racial tensions — stands as a stark contrast. There were fewer than a dozen homicides in the neighborhood last year, compared with hundreds in 1965.There were something like 700 murders for all of California in 1964. I can't find a breakdown for LA, much less Watts but I'd suspect that the writer of the article didn't do any research, just assumed that the murder rate was high. Actually the first half of the 60's saw a low murder rate generally, it started to climb in the late 60's.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Thursday, August 13, 2015
How We Forget: Watts 50 Years Later
The NYtimes had an article on the improvements in Watts 50 years after the riots.
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Messing With Plant Genes: the Fourth Way.
If we're counting, there were three ways for humans to mess with plant genes:
[Update: Grist weighs in on RNA interference. Suggests that Monsanto follow Google and change its name.]
- the time-honored method of selective breeding, picking the good ones from a crop and reproducing them. The only way approved of by all.
- direct genetic manipulation in the laboratory, inserting a gene from one species into the germplasm of another species. This is called GMO, and it is considered bad by many, particularly in Europe, because it creates "unnatural" combinations of genes. Many believe people must be given the information that they're eating/using such plants.
- direct genetic manipulation in the laboratory, using CRISPR to remove genetic material from germplasm. Not sure that people have made up their minds about this.
That means sprays might sidestep much of the controversy around agricultural biotechnology. Or so companies hope. What’s certain is that a way to accomplish the goals of genetic engineering without having to develop a GMO could bring commercial rewards. Sprays might be quickly tailored to do battle with an insect infestation or a new type of virus. Not only could this be faster than creating new GM crops, but the gene-silencing effects of RNA interference last only a few days or weeks. That means you might spray on traits such as drought resistance in times of water shortage without affecting the plant’s performance in times of normal rainfall.I know I don't understand this but the bottom line to me seems to be that the scientists are advancing faster than society is making rules. It's hard to see how those who object to GMO's (no. 2) could object to this.
[Update: Grist weighs in on RNA interference. Suggests that Monsanto follow Google and change its name.]
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Kevin Williamson Is Wrong: Foreseeing the Future
I'm nitpicking here. He writes at the National Review:
"No one in 1985 knew, or really could have known, what computers would be like ten years down the road, or twenty."(It's in the context of mocking a NYTimes columnist in 1985 who wrote that laptops were a bad idea, and moving from that to the idea we can't foresee the future so the market beats government.)
Now I remember old laptops. We had a Zenith laptop at work which we took to a training session. Actually, it wasn't a computer to put on your lap--it was a portable computer, a luggable. I also remember something else, something called an electronic calculator. When I worked at my summer job in the summer of 1959 and later, I used an old handcrank manual adding machine. By the end of the 60's electronic calculators had arrived on the scene, and by the end of the 70's we had programmable calculators. Innovators in county ASCS offices had started to buy the calculators and program them to compute program payments and loan amounts. I remember a GAO report urging the agency to establish centralized control over them.
Anyway, no more memories. My point is that by 1985 we had seen the effects of Moore's law; the capabilities of calculators had exploded and their prices had imploded. We also had seen the progression from mainframes to minis to micro/PCs. So anyone with any sense of the history of the past 20 years would have known that computers were going to get smaller and more capable.
And someone, like Al Gore, was on the verge of inventing the Internet, or at least see that an obscure military/academic tool needed to be opened to the public.
Monday, August 10, 2015
Wow--US and Vietnam Have Come a Ways
Given my age and history, this almost brings tears to my eyes:
"Consider that, as Trong [General Secretary of the Vietnamese Communits Party, visiting US] pointed out, the United States — not China — is Vietnam’s largest trading partner. In 2014, that trade amounted to $36 billion. In this context, prospective American foreign military sales (FMS) to Vietnam are merely an expansion of the two countries’ existing trade relationship."
Agriculture in Space
Government Executive reports that the first vegetables grown in space are now being harvested and eaten. (Some lettuce grown under LED's.)
In the past I've criticized some vertical farming schemes which claimed to rely on sunlight to grow their vegetables. In the case of the space station, it would seem they'd have 12 hours of sunlight and 12 of darkness, so they shouldn't need LED's. On the other hand, the sunlight lasts only 90 minutes or so at a time, so maybe they can't rely on the sun.
In the past I've criticized some vertical farming schemes which claimed to rely on sunlight to grow their vegetables. In the case of the space station, it would seem they'd have 12 hours of sunlight and 12 of darkness, so they shouldn't need LED's. On the other hand, the sunlight lasts only 90 minutes or so at a time, so maybe they can't rely on the sun.
Sunday, August 09, 2015
Some Forecasts Are Accurate: EPA in 1989
Chris Clayton at DTN goes back to a 1989 EPA "report to Congress, "The Potential Effects
of Global Climate Change on the United States,"... a
three-year study looking at impacts of climate change 30 to 50 years
out", noting several of the accurate forecasts: northern crop shifts, higher soybean yields, algae blooms in the Great Lakes, and adverse impacts on California water.
Early 20th Century North Fenton
Something completely different. The photo is of the Page Brook valley, with the farm on which I grew up in the foreground. It's taken from Richards road, which runs along the side of the hill. As farming in the area has declined (there are no longer cows nor chickens on the farm) and no longer cows on the farm across the valley from us) the trees and brush have come back. The fields all were fenced, though the lines don't stand out in this photo. In my youth the fence lines had mostly grown up with weeds and brush, silently stealing away a bit of cropland over the years.
Thursday, August 06, 2015
"Stylized Facts" and Not
Daniel Drezner offers five charts which provide an alternative view of stylized facts:
- the Obama administration has seen ever-increasing government expenditures.
- our manufacturing output continues to decline under Obama
- Mexican immigration far outstrips immigration from other countries, like China or India
- we're losing our dominant position in the world militarily
- global warming has paused.
Wednesday, August 05, 2015
It's Who You Know in Politics
Politico has a piece on how to get a job on Capitol Hill. It begins:
"Start with whomever you know in D.C. If you think hard enough, you probably know someone who lives in D.C. or is connected to it. It could be a former Hill staffer, a lobbyist or a distant relative. No matter who it is, just go see them. Ask them whom they know — you never know who somebody’s next door neighbor is (like a chief of staff on the Hill looking to hire a new staff assistant). In Washington, personal networking, whether a handshake or lunch, still trumps social networking on Facebook and LinkedIn. Follow up on every lead."It's probably all good advice, but I'm bothered by the implications. The emphasis on networking means the system is biased in favor of the already connected. Them that has, gets.
Tuesday, August 04, 2015
The Iranian RINOs
The Republicans have their RINOs (Republicans in name only). Today's Post made it seem that Iran also has RINOs (Revolutionaries in name only).
Also see this piece on Iranian views of the agreement
Also see this piece on Iranian views of the agreement
Monday, August 03, 2015
The Silent Generation's Luck--I Thought It Was Me
Wonkblog has a post discussing wealth and income over a lifetime, using generational cohorts. The money quote for me:
Later, say by the late 80's, I was a branch chief and we'd hired a bunch of baby boomers, many former clerks from county office, as part of the effort to support the new IT system. But looking at my office, I knew there was a logjam. Many, most, of my employees then had the potential to be inmanagement, at least given the prevailing theory that an excellent specialist makes a good manager. (That theory isn't necessarily true, but it was the assumption in ASCS.) But I expected at least some of them would have to compete against each other if and when I moved out of my job. With that in mind, I encouraged good employees to move to other units. While some of my boomers did, in the end two of them did compete for my job.
I wonder how much such hidden factors impact our social issues. For example, how much is the trend to adjunct professors in college necessitated because we removed mandatory retirement and the boomers are hanging on?
The winners of this historical jackpot appear to be those who were born between 1930 and 1945 and came of age after World War II, who are sometimes called The Silent Generation....Also
...the Silent Generation appears to get an additional boost because they were born during the Great Depression, a time when people had fewer babies overall. Their lower population meant that they had less competition overall for jobs, housing, investments and other opportunities. Sociologist Elwood Carlson called the generation “the lucky few” because they were smaller than the generation that came before. African-Americans and women born in those years had far more opportunity, and the generation also benefited from the expansion of the American safety net, including Social Security and Medicare, during their lives.The Silent Generation is me. Actually, I'm not surprised by this article. When I joined ASCS in 1968 there were still a handful of employees around from the New Deal days, though most I think had joined the agency after WWII. We had a week of orientation for new employees. During one session the director of the Personnel Management Division described the number of employees who were near or at retirement age. What it meant for my own career was I moved up the ladder quickly simply because people were retiring, so I didn't have much competition (except in one instance). Of course, most days I believe my promotions were a tribute to my hard work and smarts, not the luck of being born at the right time.
Later, say by the late 80's, I was a branch chief and we'd hired a bunch of baby boomers, many former clerks from county office, as part of the effort to support the new IT system. But looking at my office, I knew there was a logjam. Many, most, of my employees then had the potential to be inmanagement, at least given the prevailing theory that an excellent specialist makes a good manager. (That theory isn't necessarily true, but it was the assumption in ASCS.) But I expected at least some of them would have to compete against each other if and when I moved out of my job. With that in mind, I encouraged good employees to move to other units. While some of my boomers did, in the end two of them did compete for my job.
I wonder how much such hidden factors impact our social issues. For example, how much is the trend to adjunct professors in college necessitated because we removed mandatory retirement and the boomers are hanging on?
Saturday, August 01, 2015
Good Data Modeling Is Important--MP3s
I was usually ambivalent about the IT contractors working for ASCS/FSA. On the one hand I always thought I we could do the job better and faster ourselves, if management would only give us the dollars/people. On the other hand I have to admit I did learn a lot, even if all the contractors didn't accomplish much (at least in my fallible memory).
One of the things I did learn was data modeling, normalizing data structures and the importance of having it right. For example, the System/36 just used flat files, with multiple indexes to them. While the IT people in IRMD and KCMO did a pretty good job in capturing the data needed for some of our activities, one big thing was missed: time, most notably time as reflected in crop/fiscal/program years, and the idea that we could be operating programs for different years at the same time.
Of course you never get the thing totally right. For example, our "name" structure assumed the standard WASP structure: first name, middle name, last name, and failed to allow for the naming structures present in other parts of the world or other cultures.
Mistakes in data modeling can have big consequences, as seen in the case of the metadata scheme for MP3 files, as discussed in this piece at The Atlantic. Classical music is particularly affected.
One of the things I did learn was data modeling, normalizing data structures and the importance of having it right. For example, the System/36 just used flat files, with multiple indexes to them. While the IT people in IRMD and KCMO did a pretty good job in capturing the data needed for some of our activities, one big thing was missed: time, most notably time as reflected in crop/fiscal/program years, and the idea that we could be operating programs for different years at the same time.
Of course you never get the thing totally right. For example, our "name" structure assumed the standard WASP structure: first name, middle name, last name, and failed to allow for the naming structures present in other parts of the world or other cultures.
Mistakes in data modeling can have big consequences, as seen in the case of the metadata scheme for MP3 files, as discussed in this piece at The Atlantic. Classical music is particularly affected.
Friday, July 31, 2015
Global Warming Leads to War: France Versus Switzerland
Conflict over scarce resources often gets violent: think about the Westerns with the cattlemen versus the homesteaders or the sheep ranchers.
And here's proof that global warming will cause conflict on a national scale: the Swiss stole French water in the midst of record setting heat.
And here's proof that global warming will cause conflict on a national scale: the Swiss stole French water in the midst of record setting heat.
Thursday, July 30, 2015
Discrimination in Colleges
This Post piece goes into the reality of discrimination on the basis of gender in private colleges.
"Given that girls generally outperform boys in high school—girls earn better grades and account for 70 percent of valedictorians—you’d expect acceptance rates for women to be higher than for men.Bottom line is admissions are more equal between the sexes than that implies. Part of the fear is that after a 60-40 ratio, students will avoid the college.
GMO Soybeans for Everyone
One of the big accusations against industrial agriculture is the fact that patented seeds must be purchased each year from the seed company. This is a burden on smaller farms with tighter margins.
But patents are not forever. It turns out some of Monsanto's GMO patents are expiring. Technology Review has a report on a seed dealer who took advantage of the fact, selling GMO soybeans no longer under patent. As the article observes, this means the farmer can use some of his harvest to plant next year.
But patents are not forever. It turns out some of Monsanto's GMO patents are expiring. Technology Review has a report on a seed dealer who took advantage of the fact, selling GMO soybeans no longer under patent. As the article observes, this means the farmer can use some of his harvest to plant next year.
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Dairy and Efficiency and Meat
Nathanael Johnson at Grist has a piece on how to make meat greener. The answer: be efficient--two quotes.
The average dairy cow in California produces 20,000 pounds of milk a year. But the average dairy cow in Mexico produces only 4,000 pounds of milk a year, while in India it’s just 1,000 pounds.Interesting throughout. (Same piece as the previous post on salmon.)
The carbon footprint of American milk is 63 percent lower than in 1944, researchers have calculated.
In the 1950's I think we were doing good at about 12,000 pounds, which was well above average for the county.
How To Make Something From Nothing: Feed Salmon
"As long as we are talking about fish farming, we should note that a genetically engineered salmon can produce a pound of fish for every .83 pounds of feed it eats"
From this
From this
Tuesday, July 28, 2015
Rural Utilities Service Gets Dinged
Politico has a long piece detailing problems with RUS implementation of subsidies for rural broadband.
I'd note the absence of USDA management from the discussion.
I'd note the absence of USDA management from the discussion.
Sunday, July 26, 2015
A Quote on Todo
From a discussion of historians storage of data on hard drives, etc.:
A lot of the comments described keeping lots of old files and never looking at them. That's me.
I once looked at my working directories saved from a previous machine for the first time in five or so years. Among them was an ASCII file called todo.txt. The amount of overlap with the current version was distressing.http://crookedtimber.org/2015/07/24/postscarcitymentaleconomy/
A lot of the comments described keeping lots of old files and never looking at them. That's me.
Saturday, July 25, 2015
Wasting Food
Grist has the John Oliver video on the subject--as usual quite funny. There's an interesting bit with a farmer at a farmers market noting that it's difficult to sell the last item in the last hour. People like to choose, and they look askance at things which people before them have not chosen. Particularly with produce there's got to be some differences among items, so the last one left likely is the least desirable, and who wants to buy the least desirable?
Misleading Post Title at Technology Review
Why do I say this title,
Robotic Surgery Linked To 144 Deaths Since 2000 is misleading?
Robotic Surgery Linked To 144 Deaths Since 2000 is misleading?
Because it turns out that if the surgical patient died after surgery, it was included in the 144. But presumably some patients are going to die after surgery using any procedures, robotic, manual, or extra-terrestial. The meaningful comparison would be the rates of death after surgery using comparable illnesses/situations.
Thursday, July 23, 2015
Mom Is Rolling in Her Grave--Egg Prices
I guess it was standard in the 30's-50's for the farm wife to handle chickens, while her spouse did the "farming". My family was standard-issue in some ways and my mother was emotionally invested in her hens, both in terms of their importance in our economic enterprise and the value to humans of eggs, the most perfect food and the cheapest source of protein in these United States.
So my mother is rolling in her grave at this Post piece--a Wonkblog post entitled "Eggs Are No Longer the Cheapest Source of Protein". Egg prices have increased due to the effects of the virus.
A side note: the piece includes a chart of egg prices going back to 1965. They're now at 535 percent of the 65 prices. I think the cost of my college education has rise about 2000 percent in the same period.
So my mother is rolling in her grave at this Post piece--a Wonkblog post entitled "Eggs Are No Longer the Cheapest Source of Protein". Egg prices have increased due to the effects of the virus.
A side note: the piece includes a chart of egg prices going back to 1965. They're now at 535 percent of the 65 prices. I think the cost of my college education has rise about 2000 percent in the same period.
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Hispanic and Women Farmers and Ranchers Claims
Not sure what to make of these figures. A newspaper summary:
Here's the website and the status report
The results are very different from those in the Pigford case. I'm not sure how to interpret the differences: different standards for the application process, different review process, different dynamics among the applicants, all of the above, something else? And why the big overestimate by USDA?
According to a report filed on behalf of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack by his Office of General Counsel, with the Federal District Court in the District of Columbia, the USDA approved 3,210 of the 22,163 (14.4%) timely and completed discrimination claims that they received from Hispanic and Women Farmers and Ranchers (HWFR).
USDA awarded cash damages, forgiveness of eligible USDA farm debt and tax relief totaling over $200 million to 706 Hispanic farmers and 2,504 female farmers of all racial and ethnic backgrounds. The USDA had initially set aside $1.3 billion for payments under this settlement.
Here's the website and the status report
The results are very different from those in the Pigford case. I'm not sure how to interpret the differences: different standards for the application process, different review process, different dynamics among the applicants, all of the above, something else? And why the big overestimate by USDA?
Monday, July 20, 2015
The Loss of Old Organizations
When we did our weekly shopping in Greene, NY, one of our regular stops was the A&P. It used to be the big grocery chain. Now it's gone.
Sunstein Forfeits His Liberal Cred
Cass Sunstein is a tremendous writer, in volume and in content. A law professor, he headed Obama's OMB office reviewing regulations during the first term. He's also married to Samantha Power, our UN Ambassador. So you figure he's firmly in the liberal camp.
He forfeits all that by his essay on "Gone With the Wind", the book, in the Atlantic.
I have to say I think I had much the same reaction 20 years or so ago when I read it. Mitchell told a good story, strongly feminist. As I say in a comment on the website, I'd compare it to Downton Abbey, a similar romantic gauze combined with stories and nods to the changing times.
He forfeits all that by his essay on "Gone With the Wind", the book, in the Atlantic.
I have to say I think I had much the same reaction 20 years or so ago when I read it. Mitchell told a good story, strongly feminist. As I say in a comment on the website, I'd compare it to Downton Abbey, a similar romantic gauze combined with stories and nods to the changing times.
Saturday, July 18, 2015
Toleration for All Religion(Except...)
From the "Boston Pamphlet", referenced in the book "The empire on the Edge", an early 1772 statement of colonists positions vis a vis Britain, following a rousing statement of toleration for religion:
The only sects which he [John Locke] thinks ought to be, and which by all wise Laws are excluded from such Toleration, are those who teach Doctrines subversive of the civil Government under which they live. The Roman Catholics or Papists are excluded by Reason of such Doctrines as these that Princes excommunicated may be deposed, and those that they call Heretics may be destroyed without Mercy”; besides their recognizing the Pope in so absolute a Manner, in Subversion of Government, by introducing as far as possible into the States under whose Protection they enjoy Life, Liberty and Property, that Solecism [error in language] in Politics, mperium in imperio†leading directly to the worst Anarchy and Confusion, civil Discord, War and Bloodshed
Friday, July 17, 2015
The Loss of Quality
One of the things which has happened over my lifetime is a loss of quality:
- in music. Used to be we had audiophiles who spent thousands on their amplifiers and tuners, their speakers and turntables.
- in photography. Used to be we had photo buffs who spend thousands on their camera, and meters and lenses, and filters. Then we had digitial photography, with the arms race in the sensors.
Thursday, July 16, 2015
The Post and Corn
Yesterday's Post, as part of a concentration on corn, had an interesting article defending corn. What was interesting was the use of calories per acre:
Each person needs about 1 million calories per year.
"In the calorie department, corn is king. In 2014, average yield in the United States was 171 bushels per acre. ... Each bushel weighs 56 pounds and each pound of corn yields about 1,566 calories. That means corn averages roughly 15 million calories per acre. ....If you had taken our 2014 corn harvest of 14.2 billion bushels and used it to feed people, it would have met 17 percent of the entire world’s caloric needs.
By contrast, wheat comes in at about 4 million calories per acre, soy at 6 million. Rice is also very high-yielding, at 11 million, and potatoes are one of the few crops that can rival corn: They also yield about 15 million ....Other vegetables, while much more nutritious than corn, wheat or potatoes, are far less energy-dense. Broccoli yields about 2.5 million calories per acre, and spinach is under 2 million."
Each person needs about 1 million calories per year.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
The Draft for Women? Blast from Past
I was a draftee.
Can you believe that the wikipedia entry for "draft" refers to a sports draft?
If you want the real thing, you need to search for "conscription"
Prof. Somin at Volokh Conspiracy blogs about a current suit alleging that requiring only 18 year males to register is discriminatory. It probably is, though despite my believing there were benefits for society from the draft, we should probably just junk the whole thing.
Can you believe that the wikipedia entry for "draft" refers to a sports draft?
If you want the real thing, you need to search for "conscription"
Prof. Somin at Volokh Conspiracy blogs about a current suit alleging that requiring only 18 year males to register is discriminatory. It probably is, though despite my believing there were benefits for society from the draft, we should probably just junk the whole thing.
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
Jail Breaks and Inertia
Two notable jail breaks recently--the Mexican drug lord and the two cons in Dannemora prison. In both cases the escape route was a set of passages connecting the jail cell to the outside world. I don't know how often there are these sorts of escapes, but they've been happening at least since Dumas wrote "The Count of Monte Cristo".
It's bureaucratic inertia at work. The easy way to screw up such plans is simply to move prisoners around to different cells at unpredictable intervals. Someone can invest the time and energy and willpower to create a passage from a cell to the world only if reasonably assured that they will benefit by it--remove the assurance and they won't invest the effort. But given that prisons are bureaucracies devoted to maintaining control and order, the idea of creating uncertainty is unthinkable. (To be fair, such transfers would likely disrupt established social routines within the prison, so might well be more undesirable than an escape every x years.)
It's bureaucratic inertia at work. The easy way to screw up such plans is simply to move prisoners around to different cells at unpredictable intervals. Someone can invest the time and energy and willpower to create a passage from a cell to the world only if reasonably assured that they will benefit by it--remove the assurance and they won't invest the effort. But given that prisons are bureaucracies devoted to maintaining control and order, the idea of creating uncertainty is unthinkable. (To be fair, such transfers would likely disrupt established social routines within the prison, so might well be more undesirable than an escape every x years.)
Anyone Want a New Outer?
Verizon sent me an email with the heading:



Get a new outer for $199.99 plus taxes and shipping
Somehow they think our household does a lot more e-stuff than it does.
The case of the missing "r".



| ||||||||||
Monday, July 13, 2015
Two Recommendations--An Empire on the Edge and Ghosts of Versailles
Just because, I'd recommend a book and an opera.
The book is one I haven't finished reading, but I like very much. It's "An Empire on the Edge", a finalist for the 2015 Pulitzer. It's the British side of the road to our Revolution, with lots of stuff I didn't know. (John Brown played as big a role in the Revolution as John Brown did in the Civil War.) Particularly like the interplay of politics, personality, economics, and government, with just a tad of bureaucracy thrown in.
The opera is "The Ghosts of Versailles", which we saw at Wolf Trap Friday in a chamber version. No DVD available for anyone outside the 1 percent, but if you have a chance, go see it. Laughed until I cried.
The book is one I haven't finished reading, but I like very much. It's "An Empire on the Edge", a finalist for the 2015 Pulitzer. It's the British side of the road to our Revolution, with lots of stuff I didn't know. (John Brown played as big a role in the Revolution as John Brown did in the Civil War.) Particularly like the interplay of politics, personality, economics, and government, with just a tad of bureaucracy thrown in.
The opera is "The Ghosts of Versailles", which we saw at Wolf Trap Friday in a chamber version. No DVD available for anyone outside the 1 percent, but if you have a chance, go see it. Laughed until I cried.
House Ag Appropriations
From the House appropriations ag subcommittee;
Here's the committee report on MIDAS:
"Information Technology Waste
.—GAO and USDA’s OIG have issued reports that highlight poor program performance in the past and uncertainty regarding USDA’s capacity to effectively manage IT acquisitions in the future. Auditors found that the Secretary halted further development on the MIDAS program after spending almost $500 million for nearly a decade on planning and development of this critical system. This investment of time and limited resources has resulted in the delivery of about one-fifth of the functionality intended for twice the projected cost. While the Secretary has highlighted saving hundreds of millions of dollars on IT, the Committee notes that MIDAS is a prime example of government waste and inefficiency. MIDAS is still expected to cost another $330 million over the lifecycle of the project, yet the system will have severely reduced capacity. The total cost will equal almost three times the original projections.
GAO noted that problems with MIDAS were due to the lack of implementation of USDA and Farm Service Agency (FSA) program management policies and best practices covering key disciplines such as requirements for development and management, project planning and monitoring, system testing, and executive-level governance. Following project stoppage, the Department has been exploring other options—at an additional cost to taxpayers and time spent on these modernization efforts—to provide the functionality that USDA had promised Congress and the agricultural community, including a modernized acreage reporting system and an online office for American farmers and ranchers to access. Given the lack of IT leadership demonstrated by the Secretary on the MIDAS investment, the Committee remains concerned as to whether the Department will be any more successful with IT acquisition activities moving forward than it was in the past with MIDAS. The Committee includes statutory language that places spending controls on both MIDAS and other IT acquisitions.
FSA IT.
—FSA’s management of certain IT projects has produced increased costs, bloated budgets, and inaccurate budget estimates. These projects include the MIDAS program and increased or inaccurate charges from the National Information Technology Center, for which costs have tripled since fiscal year 2014. The agreement includes statutory language that allows FSA to release funds for farm program delivery IT projects only after review by the GAO and approval by the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate. The roadmap submitted by FSA in fiscal year 2015 was the first step to bringing accountability and guidance to almost a decade of mismanagement. In this regard, the GAO and the OIG are recommending that FSA establish a plan to guide the agency in adopting recognized best practices and in following agency policy. The GAO also recommends that the agency adhere to specific practices within key management disciplines before proceeding with further system development. FSA is directed to continue quarterly briefings in writing for the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate regarding all IT projects and activities related to farm program delivery.
And an "attaboy" for NRCS:
The Committee commends NRCS for its organizational realignment of administrative functions and appreciates the savings this will generate. NRCS has worked to become a more efficient, accountable organization, and the Committee encourages NRCS to work with other agencies within USDA to do the same
Here's the committee report on MIDAS:
"Information Technology Waste
.—GAO and USDA’s OIG have issued reports that highlight poor program performance in the past and uncertainty regarding USDA’s capacity to effectively manage IT acquisitions in the future. Auditors found that the Secretary halted further development on the MIDAS program after spending almost $500 million for nearly a decade on planning and development of this critical system. This investment of time and limited resources has resulted in the delivery of about one-fifth of the functionality intended for twice the projected cost. While the Secretary has highlighted saving hundreds of millions of dollars on IT, the Committee notes that MIDAS is a prime example of government waste and inefficiency. MIDAS is still expected to cost another $330 million over the lifecycle of the project, yet the system will have severely reduced capacity. The total cost will equal almost three times the original projections.
GAO noted that problems with MIDAS were due to the lack of implementation of USDA and Farm Service Agency (FSA) program management policies and best practices covering key disciplines such as requirements for development and management, project planning and monitoring, system testing, and executive-level governance. Following project stoppage, the Department has been exploring other options—at an additional cost to taxpayers and time spent on these modernization efforts—to provide the functionality that USDA had promised Congress and the agricultural community, including a modernized acreage reporting system and an online office for American farmers and ranchers to access. Given the lack of IT leadership demonstrated by the Secretary on the MIDAS investment, the Committee remains concerned as to whether the Department will be any more successful with IT acquisition activities moving forward than it was in the past with MIDAS. The Committee includes statutory language that places spending controls on both MIDAS and other IT acquisitions.
FSA IT.
—FSA’s management of certain IT projects has produced increased costs, bloated budgets, and inaccurate budget estimates. These projects include the MIDAS program and increased or inaccurate charges from the National Information Technology Center, for which costs have tripled since fiscal year 2014. The agreement includes statutory language that allows FSA to release funds for farm program delivery IT projects only after review by the GAO and approval by the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate. The roadmap submitted by FSA in fiscal year 2015 was the first step to bringing accountability and guidance to almost a decade of mismanagement. In this regard, the GAO and the OIG are recommending that FSA establish a plan to guide the agency in adopting recognized best practices and in following agency policy. The GAO also recommends that the agency adhere to specific practices within key management disciplines before proceeding with further system development. FSA is directed to continue quarterly briefings in writing for the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate regarding all IT projects and activities related to farm program delivery.
And an "attaboy" for NRCS:
The Committee commends NRCS for its organizational realignment of administrative functions and appreciates the savings this will generate. NRCS has worked to become a more efficient, accountable organization, and the Committee encourages NRCS to work with other agencies within USDA to do the same
Thursday, July 09, 2015
Clear Writing
Clear writing seems to be a perennial topic. When I started work, the (retiring) lead editor in Directives had completed a series of writing classes and had incorporated her wisdom in the handbook. 10 years later Jimmy Carter came along and we had to certify that our regulations were clearly written.
Skip ahead to today and this Post piece describes a new effort. The problem is eternal, and the fight against jargon is worthy.
Skip ahead to today and this Post piece describes a new effort. The problem is eternal, and the fight against jargon is worthy.
Dairy Farming in Italy?
I'm sure this isn't representative of Italian dairies. The story about driving cows 100 miles between winter and summer pastures is interesting, though it leaves many questions unanswered. (Since the lead character is a cheesemaker, I'm assuming these are dairy cows, though the wikipedia entry is less clear. ) My big question: when and where are they milked? Milking during the drive seems unfeasible, which would seem to imply milking only at one end of the drive or the other. So these surely aren't milked for the 300 days standard for Holsteins in my youth. And where are the calves--do they make the drive as well?
I vaguely remember in my youth reading about herds in Switzerland going from one pasture to the other. I suppose the same issues arise.
I vaguely remember in my youth reading about herds in Switzerland going from one pasture to the other. I suppose the same issues arise.
Wednesday, July 08, 2015
Something Completely Different: a Cop
Via Kottke.org, this piece written by a New York cop, who used to be an aspiring actress.
Tuesday, July 07, 2015
How History Gets Distorted
The NYTimes in a roundup of interesting stuff mentioned the "EveryThreeMinutes" twitterbot which pumps out a tweet every 3 minutes describing a sale/purchase of a slave in the antebellum South. This is from the site (not up on Twitter, so don't know the terminology).
When you read the reference, available at Google, it's: "Slavery and the Numbers Game: A Critique of Time on the Cross", by Herbert George Gutman
Time on the Cross was a 1974 book which changed the historiography of slavery, as noted in the wikipedia site. Gutman's book and criticism of TofC is briefly described there.
According to the page displayed by Google, Gutman reasons this way: He asserts that 2 million slaves were sold between 1820 and 1860, a statistic I've seen elsewhere. He goes on to say: " If we assume that slave sales did not occur on Sundays and holidays and that such selling went on for ten hours on working days, a slave was sold on average every 3.6 minutes between 1820 and 1860." This is the source for Every3Minutes.
Note, however, that the twitterbot seems to be running 24 hours a day, not 10 hours a day. Gutman is saying 167 slaves are sold every work day( (10 hours * 60 minutes)/3.6), twitterbot is saying 400 slaves every calendar day. How much difference does it make: it implies 5,840,000 sales over the 40 years, not 2,000,000. That's a big difference.
In the twitterbots defense, it's an easy mistake to make. Ordinarily when we say something like: " X people are killed every day by Y", it's 365 days a year, not 200 workdays. Gutman switched the usual basis in his calculations, presumably to make a more impressive case against Time on the Cross.
(I could quibble about Gutman's calculations--using his figures I get 3.74 minutes, not 3.6.
40 years times 52 weeks times 6 days a week (= 12480), minus 10 days for holidays, times 10 hours times 60 minutes = 7,482,000 minutes divided by 2,000,000 = 3.741 minutes. But since I'm going on only the page Google shows me, there may be something I'm missing.)
The bottom line is that twitter will spread the 3.6 minutes figure more widely, and it will become a concrete fact to be used in making history come alive, despite its inaccuracy.
Every Three MinutesLooking at the reference, it seems that the person/people between the twitterbot is stretching a bit: "Every Four Minutes" might be more appropriate if you follow normal rounding rules and don't want to go with "Every3.6Minutes".
@Every3Minutes[In the United States] a slave was sold on average every 3.6 minutes between 1820 and 1860 ~ Herbert Gutman
When you read the reference, available at Google, it's: "Slavery and the Numbers Game: A Critique of Time on the Cross", by Herbert George Gutman
Time on the Cross was a 1974 book which changed the historiography of slavery, as noted in the wikipedia site. Gutman's book and criticism of TofC is briefly described there.
According to the page displayed by Google, Gutman reasons this way: He asserts that 2 million slaves were sold between 1820 and 1860, a statistic I've seen elsewhere. He goes on to say: " If we assume that slave sales did not occur on Sundays and holidays and that such selling went on for ten hours on working days, a slave was sold on average every 3.6 minutes between 1820 and 1860." This is the source for Every3Minutes.
Note, however, that the twitterbot seems to be running 24 hours a day, not 10 hours a day. Gutman is saying 167 slaves are sold every work day( (10 hours * 60 minutes)/3.6), twitterbot is saying 400 slaves every calendar day. How much difference does it make: it implies 5,840,000 sales over the 40 years, not 2,000,000. That's a big difference.
In the twitterbots defense, it's an easy mistake to make. Ordinarily when we say something like: " X people are killed every day by Y", it's 365 days a year, not 200 workdays. Gutman switched the usual basis in his calculations, presumably to make a more impressive case against Time on the Cross.
(I could quibble about Gutman's calculations--using his figures I get 3.74 minutes, not 3.6.
40 years times 52 weeks times 6 days a week (= 12480), minus 10 days for holidays, times 10 hours times 60 minutes = 7,482,000 minutes divided by 2,000,000 = 3.741 minutes. But since I'm going on only the page Google shows me, there may be something I'm missing.)
The bottom line is that twitter will spread the 3.6 minutes figure more widely, and it will become a concrete fact to be used in making history come alive, despite its inaccuracy.
Monday, July 06, 2015
Our Lying Founding Father
Ben Franklin is not trustworthy, as proven by this.
A diplomat is someone sent abroad to lie for her country. It looks as if Ben was doing his own black propaganda.
A diplomat is someone sent abroad to lie for her country. It looks as if Ben was doing his own black propaganda.
What, to a Native American, Is the US Flag?
We're coming up on the 12th of July in Ulster, which marks part of "marching season", which refers to the times when the opposing Ulster parties (Protestant/Catholic) parade their flags and banners, sometimes through the opponent's backyard. I just came back from a drive on Elden Street in Herndon, where a number of houses had the US flag displayed. Some perhaps from the Fourth, others probably an everyday display.
A flag is a symbol which cuts two ways--it symbolizes the unity of the faithful and divides the faithful from the infidel. The Ulster example is (or was in the recent past) the most extreme one possible without having an armed conflict; the Herndon example is the most relaxed one possible without having the symbol lose all meaning.
Life is complicated. The Times today has a story on the reconciliation between Vietnam and the US. Accompanying it is a photo showing the Vietnamese and US flags displayed side by side. ("Seventy eight percent of Vietnamese said they had a favorable opinion of the United States in a poll published this year by the Pew Research Center. Among those under 30 years old, it was 88 percent.") Why can Vietnamese and Americans reconcile when Protestants and Catholics can't, or at least couldn't until the end of the 20th century?
And I wonder: to Native Americans, what is the meaning of the U.S. flag? At least outside the thirteen original states, it flew over the military which sometimes defeated their ancestors.
A flag is a symbol which cuts two ways--it symbolizes the unity of the faithful and divides the faithful from the infidel. The Ulster example is (or was in the recent past) the most extreme one possible without having an armed conflict; the Herndon example is the most relaxed one possible without having the symbol lose all meaning.
Life is complicated. The Times today has a story on the reconciliation between Vietnam and the US. Accompanying it is a photo showing the Vietnamese and US flags displayed side by side. ("Seventy eight percent of Vietnamese said they had a favorable opinion of the United States in a poll published this year by the Pew Research Center. Among those under 30 years old, it was 88 percent.") Why can Vietnamese and Americans reconcile when Protestants and Catholics can't, or at least couldn't until the end of the 20th century?
And I wonder: to Native Americans, what is the meaning of the U.S. flag? At least outside the thirteen original states, it flew over the military which sometimes defeated their ancestors.
Saturday, July 04, 2015
The First Fourth of July Celebration
Boston1775 has John Adams' letter to his 12 year old daughter Abigail, the oldest child, recounting the way the Congress, military, and people of Philadelphia celebrated the first Fourth.
Friday, July 03, 2015
Greeks Work Harder Than Germans
The Wonkblog has 15 charts showing differences between Greece and Germany. The fact in the title is the most surprising, closely followed by the fact they work much longer hours than Germans and the fact that Germans only work 26 hours a week
Thursday, July 02, 2015
Differences in Democrats and Republicans: Elections
I seem to be focused on politics these days. The other day there was a piece on differing attitudes towards electoral structures; specifically the construction of electoral districts. Back in the day there was a concept called "the establishment", something intellectuals had picked up from the British. In the 60's it meant Galbraith's "bigs"--big government, big business, big labor. All three have suffered in the years since. Reagan proclaimed the end of the "era of big government", and it's certainly dwindled as entitlements and contracting have expanded. Big labor is small these days, except for public employee unions. And big business: who would have believed Apple replaced GM and IBM?
But our political attitudes still carry over. The way I see it, Democrats distrust "the establishment" still, and prefer nonpartisan expertise, presumably drawn from the universities, the new "big education". They want panels of experts to draw Congressional district lines. Republicans trust the establishment still, and believe it can be trusted to establish lines which work for the society.
But our political attitudes still carry over. The way I see it, Democrats distrust "the establishment" still, and prefer nonpartisan expertise, presumably drawn from the universities, the new "big education". They want panels of experts to draw Congressional district lines. Republicans trust the establishment still, and believe it can be trusted to establish lines which work for the society.
Wednesday, July 01, 2015
Two-Faced Political Evaluations
This post is inspired by a conservative post over at Powerline, in which the writer predicts that Democrats will be apathetic in 2016 because Obama's administration has failed at so much.
One thing which struck me about the post was that the same writer has, in the past, voiced an entirely different appraisal of Obama--that is, Obama has succeeded in his ill-advised ambitions, socializing the country, expanding executive power, etc. etc.
Now I disagree with both, but I think it's an example of something common in political commentary, on both the right and the left: a two-faced evaluation. Either our political opponents are powerful adversaries whose exploits are threatening to overrun the last redoubt of virtue and proper thought or they are pathetic losers whose pitiable writings at best conceal a total absence of reason and reality. [/end exaggeration for effect].
I remember during the rise of Reagan to be the nominee and then during his Presidency I had the same sort of evaluations of him that Obama's opponents voice today. There seems to be something about political conflict which often brings out the worst in people.
One thing which struck me about the post was that the same writer has, in the past, voiced an entirely different appraisal of Obama--that is, Obama has succeeded in his ill-advised ambitions, socializing the country, expanding executive power, etc. etc.
Now I disagree with both, but I think it's an example of something common in political commentary, on both the right and the left: a two-faced evaluation. Either our political opponents are powerful adversaries whose exploits are threatening to overrun the last redoubt of virtue and proper thought or they are pathetic losers whose pitiable writings at best conceal a total absence of reason and reality. [/end exaggeration for effect].
I remember during the rise of Reagan to be the nominee and then during his Presidency I had the same sort of evaluations of him that Obama's opponents voice today. There seems to be something about political conflict which often brings out the worst in people.
Monday, June 29, 2015
Programming Languages and System Development
It's almost 40 years since my first programming courses. I never got paid for programming, but I did find ways, by stretching my job responsibilities, to do some programming during work hours, or after. My first language was, of course, COBOL. I also did a very little Powerbuilder, some Javascript, and a lot of Wordperfect macros. But that ended almost 20 years ago, so there's been a lot of changes since. I read stuff, and see references to Python, and PHP, and Github, and wonder what the hell?
So I really enjoyed this very very very long post. It told me just enough about current times, even though I had to split my reading over 3 days. A whole lot has changed, no mention of "waterfall development", no mention of James Martin, etc. etc. but some things haven't, as witness this quote.
So I really enjoyed this very very very long post. It told me just enough about current times, even though I had to split my reading over 3 days. A whole lot has changed, no mention of "waterfall development", no mention of James Martin, etc. etc. but some things haven't, as witness this quote.
"Most of your programming life will be spent trying to figure out what broke, and if the computer helps you, maybe you can watch your kids play soccer."
Sunday, June 28, 2015
Republican Dominance of the Supreme Court
In the wake of this week's Supreme Court decisions, some Republicans/conservatives are bemoaning the Court and its membership.
I had an idea, but I was surprised to find these facts, from wikipedia:
Years since Democratic appointees were last a majority on the court: 43 (Nixon in 1972 )
Years there were at least 7 Republican appointees on the court: 1976-2012
I had an idea, but I was surprised to find these facts, from wikipedia:
Years since Democratic appointees were last a majority on the court: 43 (Nixon in 1972 )
Years there were at least 7 Republican appointees on the court: 1976-2012
Thursday, June 25, 2015
How Government Really Works-Part LXXIV
The VA is having a bad time. The auditors just found they had parked money with the Government Printing Office, $43 million in fact. See Lisa Rein's piece in the Post.
My narrative from the story: Gen. Shinseki gets appointed head of VA by Obama, as a reward for being "right" on Iraq, or at least disputing the number of troops required. Like most political, and even nonpolitical, heads of agencies, he has some pet ideas. One such, is that every veteran needs a handbook to explain to him or her what VA benefits are available, how to get, them. Such a handbook must run to many pages, and the number of veterans is many millions, so the cost of printing the handbooks is also in the millions. The GPO handles government printing, and charges the agency the cost plus a service fee.
Now since the handbook is the pet idea of the boss, the VA bureaucracy naturally turn to to implement it. So they find the money to print the handbook, and since the contents may change, they plan to redo the process every couple years. To finance the printing, they transfer money into their account with GPO, to be available when needed. However, apparently (Rein's not quite clear or maybe the auditors weren't) the bureaucrats forgot about the money, or maybe (more likely IMHO) the people changed and the new people didn't know.
The points I read into the narrative: the bigshot's pet idea, the eagerness of the bureaucrats to satisfy him.
I'm a veteran. I'm also a former bureaucrat. I'm reasonably comfortable reading prose. I'm likely more able to parse VA text than 95 percent of my fellow veterans. There's no way I'd read a handbook from the VA, at least not since the Internet. So I think Shinseki's idea, though well-intentioned, was a waste of money in the first place.
I can imagine the VA bureaucrats being delighted to do it--unlike ideas Shinseki may or may not have had to change VA operations, a handbook is easy to do. All it requires is money. You please the boss, and look good yourself without the pains of upsetting the boat.
Unfortunately, as a pet idea there's no ongoing organization behind it, so the dollars at GPO get a little lost.
My narrative from the story: Gen. Shinseki gets appointed head of VA by Obama, as a reward for being "right" on Iraq, or at least disputing the number of troops required. Like most political, and even nonpolitical, heads of agencies, he has some pet ideas. One such, is that every veteran needs a handbook to explain to him or her what VA benefits are available, how to get, them. Such a handbook must run to many pages, and the number of veterans is many millions, so the cost of printing the handbooks is also in the millions. The GPO handles government printing, and charges the agency the cost plus a service fee.
Now since the handbook is the pet idea of the boss, the VA bureaucracy naturally turn to to implement it. So they find the money to print the handbook, and since the contents may change, they plan to redo the process every couple years. To finance the printing, they transfer money into their account with GPO, to be available when needed. However, apparently (Rein's not quite clear or maybe the auditors weren't) the bureaucrats forgot about the money, or maybe (more likely IMHO) the people changed and the new people didn't know.
The points I read into the narrative: the bigshot's pet idea, the eagerness of the bureaucrats to satisfy him.
I'm a veteran. I'm also a former bureaucrat. I'm reasonably comfortable reading prose. I'm likely more able to parse VA text than 95 percent of my fellow veterans. There's no way I'd read a handbook from the VA, at least not since the Internet. So I think Shinseki's idea, though well-intentioned, was a waste of money in the first place.
I can imagine the VA bureaucrats being delighted to do it--unlike ideas Shinseki may or may not have had to change VA operations, a handbook is easy to do. All it requires is money. You please the boss, and look good yourself without the pains of upsetting the boat.
Unfortunately, as a pet idea there's no ongoing organization behind it, so the dollars at GPO get a little lost.
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
What's Wrong With the Auditors?
The old question, from the Roman poet Juvenal, is: "quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Earlier I posted about the new OIG report on FSA's MIDAS project. I've lost track of all the GAO and OIG reports critical of ASCS/FSA/USDA's automation efforts. Juvenal's question doesn't quite fit--nowadays it implies some misconduct while my point is directed towards effectiveness.
In other words, given all those audit reports you'd think there would be some improvement over the years, but USDA and its agencies still seem to be ineffective in doing large IT projects. I wonder why?
Some possibilities:
Earlier I posted about the new OIG report on FSA's MIDAS project. I've lost track of all the GAO and OIG reports critical of ASCS/FSA/USDA's automation efforts. Juvenal's question doesn't quite fit--nowadays it implies some misconduct while my point is directed towards effectiveness.
In other words, given all those audit reports you'd think there would be some improvement over the years, but USDA and its agencies still seem to be ineffective in doing large IT projects. I wonder why?
Some possibilities:
- IT procurement and development of IT systems keeps getting more complicated, so the bureaucracy's learning curve as embodied in the GAO/OIG reports doesn't gain on the difficulty curve of the projects.
- the USDA bureaucracy is incapable of learning, maybe because the policy officials turnover too fast, there's no insitutional memory, there's lack of ability or training, or something else.
- the auditors give bad advice, either misleading the bureaucracy on how to correct the problems or misidentifying the problems
- Congress fails to do good oversight--using the reports to hold the bureaucrats feet to the fire, or maybe they focus on the wrong issues.
- Congress fails to provide the money to do well
- the President and OMB fail to follow through on the reports
- the IT projects conflict with an outdated orgnaizational structure and culture.
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
The Raisin Decision and Government Supported Cartels
Supreme Court handed down the decision on the raisin reserve case. As expected, they ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
Megan McArdle and Eugene Volokh fully approve and David Bernstein mostly approves.
Me, I go back Prof. Robin Williams in his survey of American society in 1962. Then he observed and wrote that there was a growing trend for American government, particularly federal, to do what today we would call "out-sourcing". At that time he was referring to the quasi-public, quasi-private setups like the Federal Reserve and a bunch of USDA arrangements dating to and before the New Deal. They'd specifically include the marketing orders and the farmer-elected county committees which at that time had much power in the predecessor agencies of FSA (i.e., Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service and Farmers Home Administration).
The point was that the Feds were delegating some governmental authority to bodies which were privately elected, whether by bankers in the case of the Federal Reserve, or the various USDA committees. Because it was a sociology course, his was a mostly descriptive description. The reliance on elections he viewed as a part of the country's general commitment to democracy, both in government and in NGO's (to use today's term again).
I suspect in the past I've expressed reservations about the case. It seems to me in this case the Hornes, the plaintiffs, are attempting to free ride. I go back to the early history, pre-New Deal, in which there were repeated attempts by farmers voluntarily to cut production in order to drive up prices. Because of "free riding", those attempts always failed, usually rather quickly.
My impression in the case of peanuts is the issue is a bit moot: the "raisin reserve" hasn't been used for 12 years or more and the supply/demand situation seems to have fundamentally changed. ("This time it's different"). So killing the raisin reserve may be simply a case of weeding an obsolescent idea. But does the logic of the case stop there?
Megan McArdle and Eugene Volokh fully approve and David Bernstein mostly approves.
Me, I go back Prof. Robin Williams in his survey of American society in 1962. Then he observed and wrote that there was a growing trend for American government, particularly federal, to do what today we would call "out-sourcing". At that time he was referring to the quasi-public, quasi-private setups like the Federal Reserve and a bunch of USDA arrangements dating to and before the New Deal. They'd specifically include the marketing orders and the farmer-elected county committees which at that time had much power in the predecessor agencies of FSA (i.e., Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service and Farmers Home Administration).
The point was that the Feds were delegating some governmental authority to bodies which were privately elected, whether by bankers in the case of the Federal Reserve, or the various USDA committees. Because it was a sociology course, his was a mostly descriptive description. The reliance on elections he viewed as a part of the country's general commitment to democracy, both in government and in NGO's (to use today's term again).
I suspect in the past I've expressed reservations about the case. It seems to me in this case the Hornes, the plaintiffs, are attempting to free ride. I go back to the early history, pre-New Deal, in which there were repeated attempts by farmers voluntarily to cut production in order to drive up prices. Because of "free riding", those attempts always failed, usually rather quickly.
My impression in the case of peanuts is the issue is a bit moot: the "raisin reserve" hasn't been used for 12 years or more and the supply/demand situation seems to have fundamentally changed. ("This time it's different"). So killing the raisin reserve may be simply a case of weeding an obsolescent idea. But does the logic of the case stop there?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)