Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Thursday, October 31, 2019
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Is the Navy Going Sailor-less?
Is a sailor a sailor if she doesn't sail the seas?
"The Navy in its 2020 budget request asked Congress for the first installment on a $4-billion acquisition of 10 large unmanned surface vessels and nine unmanned submarines. Boeing is developing the robotic submarines, using its 51-feet-long Orca submersible as a starting point."From this article, via Lawyers, Guns & money.
Interesting that Boeing is involved--an example of how new technology can disrupt established patterns?
Tuesday, October 29, 2019
The Bad Old Days--My Dead Cousins
I was the youngest of 8 first cousins, 2 children in my family, my paternal uncle had 2 children, one maternal aunt had one child, the other had 3
Those figures are what I was aware of. But in fact there were 3 first cousins who died young, 2 as babies and 1 at age 7.
My point: if I rely only on my personal experience life in the US looked good and safe, but that's misleading because I don't see my whole cohort, just the survivors.
Those figures are what I was aware of. But in fact there were 3 first cousins who died young, 2 as babies and 1 at age 7.
My point: if I rely only on my personal experience life in the US looked good and safe, but that's misleading because I don't see my whole cohort, just the survivors.
Monday, October 28, 2019
Second-Generation Migrants Do Well
NYTimes reports on a study comparing the economic status of second-generation immigrants--the children of immigrants--to the child of comparable native Americans. Almost without exception the second generation from whatever country does better than the natives.
The study suggests that the difference relates to where the sons lived--living in urban and growing areas was an advantage over living in rural and stagnant areas. That makes some sense, although as I comment, there's a big range in the results; I'd suspect a range too great to be explained only by location.
What's not emphasized in the article is the fact that immigrants are able to advance, better than natives.
The study suggests that the difference relates to where the sons lived--living in urban and growing areas was an advantage over living in rural and stagnant areas. That makes some sense, although as I comment, there's a big range in the results; I'd suspect a range too great to be explained only by location.
What's not emphasized in the article is the fact that immigrants are able to advance, better than natives.
Sunday, October 27, 2019
The Unpopulated United States
When we go up to Rhinebeck, NY for the Sheep and Wool Festival, we usually take US15 to Harrisburg and either I-78 or I-81/84 to I-87. Either way, but particularly the latter, leads through sparsely populated areas, but even the more populated areas don't seem particularly densely settled.
According to this site some of the counties have less than 100 people per square mile. Reminds me of James Carville's crack about Pennsylvania being Philadelphia and Pittsburgh with Alabama in between.
You can guess that all those sparsely settled counties vote Republican, then and now.
Saturday, October 26, 2019
The End of the Clerk-Typist?
OPM is proposing to end job classifications where there are fewer than 25 occupants across the Federal government. One of the occupations is "clerk-typist"!!
Once clerk-typist was a very common job--when I joined ASCS there were 2 or 3 in the Directives Branch. Typically people would move to a secretarial position or a more specific position after they'd acquired some experience in the office. Clerk-typist was an entry position, basically requiring you to pass a typing test. IIRC 40 words per minute with minimal errors.
Duuring the early 70's there was a Work-Study program. Much is fuzzy here; I don't remember what the program objective was--"diversity" as we'd say today, perhaps, or maybe just opening a new way to recruit clerical employees. And I'm not sure of the details at this remove--I think high school students, perhaps seniors, spent time on the job during the school year and particularly during the summer. As I recall we had two students from DC, who happened to be dating, I think. Both were good and we were short-handed so we wanted to make them both permanent, but to do so they needed to pass the typing test for the clerk-typist position. Not to be sexist but of course the woman qualified easily, while the man had problems. With the help mainly of the management technician in the office he took and retook the typing test until he finally passed, to the pleasure of his new co-workers.
They married a couple years later. Over the years they advanced within ASCS, ending as professionals.
Once clerk-typist was a very common job--when I joined ASCS there were 2 or 3 in the Directives Branch. Typically people would move to a secretarial position or a more specific position after they'd acquired some experience in the office. Clerk-typist was an entry position, basically requiring you to pass a typing test. IIRC 40 words per minute with minimal errors.
Duuring the early 70's there was a Work-Study program. Much is fuzzy here; I don't remember what the program objective was--"diversity" as we'd say today, perhaps, or maybe just opening a new way to recruit clerical employees. And I'm not sure of the details at this remove--I think high school students, perhaps seniors, spent time on the job during the school year and particularly during the summer. As I recall we had two students from DC, who happened to be dating, I think. Both were good and we were short-handed so we wanted to make them both permanent, but to do so they needed to pass the typing test for the clerk-typist position. Not to be sexist but of course the woman qualified easily, while the man had problems. With the help mainly of the management technician in the office he took and retook the typing test until he finally passed, to the pleasure of his new co-workers.
They married a couple years later. Over the years they advanced within ASCS, ending as professionals.
Friday, October 25, 2019
A Good Provider Is One Who Leaves
That's the title of Jaon DEParle's new book. It's an interesting read--DeParle moves between the saga of an extended Filopino family's travels and travails in working in the Middle East, in America, and on crruise ships, all the time sending remittances home to support and boost the living standards of those left behind, and a more abstract description of patterns of emigrant workers and migration since the 1965 changes in US immigration laws.
Points stood out to me, as new and unexpected:
Points stood out to me, as new and unexpected:
- the importance of the family network, emigrants providing money to those left behind, who in turn provide care for the children of those emigrant workers, possibly becoming closer to the child than their natural parent
- the significance of cellphone technology in vanquishing distance and maintaining family ties.,
- The variety of experiences, working all hours, getting involved in scams and means of making money on the side, or illegally, getting exploited by middle men and losing money through ill-advised expenditures (country rubes fleeced city slickers(.
Thursday, October 24, 2019
Proud To Be "Human Scum"
My cousin identifies as a Republican, though she's recently voted mostly Democratic. But she appreciates President Trump's calling his Republican critics "human scum". She's planning a t-shirt with that motto to fluaunt that honor to the world.
I don't qualify for it--rather like Americans can't really be knighted by the Queen, I'm left standing by the side, envious.
I don't qualify for it--rather like Americans can't really be knighted by the Queen, I'm left standing by the side, envious.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Updating Voter Lists
This article described the open process being used in Ohio. They proposed to purge 235,000 inactive voters, but found that 20 percent should not have been purged.
They used an open process-generating a list, then making it public so interested groups could find errors.
Although liberals tend to be suspicious of these exercises, I had enough experience with maintaining name and address lists to be open to it. These days bytes are cheap, and computers fast, so there's less need to keep the list clean and purged of old data. But a clean list is still good:
They used an open process-generating a list, then making it public so interested groups could find errors.
Although liberals tend to be suspicious of these exercises, I had enough experience with maintaining name and address lists to be open to it. These days bytes are cheap, and computers fast, so there's less need to keep the list clean and purged of old data. But a clean list is still good:
- although the process of checking voter id against the list may be automated, as it is in Fairfax county, there will be times when a human has to get involved. When that happens the cleaner the better, so there's less likelihood of confusion and mistakes.
- although fraud--impersonating a voter--is vanishingly rare it can happen, and having dead people on the voter list is one vulnerability.
In my ideal bureaucrat's world, there would be a master register for all residents, so checking could be automated. But that's never going to happen in the U.S., so this open process seems to me to be the nezt best thing.
Wednesday, October 16, 2019
It's All in the Spin: We Want Pence
One of the attacks the Republicans are using against the impeachment inquiries in the House is that it's an attempted coup, overthrowing an election.
Sounds good, so we Democrats need a counter:
Bottom line: we aren't trying to oust President Trump. We have the highest regard for his abilities as an entertainer and businessman and would like to see him devote his great energy and supreme intellect to those pursuits. It's a win-win, because a President Pence would continue to nominate conservative judges and make a great looking president, while Donald Trump could organize and create an entertainment/news network to take the flag which Fox News is in the process of dropping.
People who forecast the outcomes of elections say the Republicans should be favored to win in 2020 based on peace and prosperity, so there's no downside for Republicans in impeaching the President.
Sounds good, so we Democrats need a counter:
Bottom line: we aren't trying to oust President Trump. We have the highest regard for his abilities as an entertainer and businessman and would like to see him devote his great energy and supreme intellect to those pursuits. It's a win-win, because a President Pence would continue to nominate conservative judges and make a great looking president, while Donald Trump could organize and create an entertainment/news network to take the flag which Fox News is in the process of dropping.
People who forecast the outcomes of elections say the Republicans should be favored to win in 2020 based on peace and prosperity, so there's no downside for Republicans in impeaching the President.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)