Today was about perfect: sunny, low 80's, low humidity, the trees are green.
The garden is doing well, although we've got a surplus of spinach from the plants which over-wintered and over which I sweated last fall.
I'm in no mood to discuss Trump, or impeachment, or bureaucracy.
Enjoy.
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Monday, April 22, 2019
The Proliferation of Popular Culture References
My wife and I subscribe to Netflix and Amazon Prime and watch regularly. Maybe I'm just feeling out of it these days, but it seems to me there are more and more popular culture references in what we're watching, more and more of which I don't get.
Sometimes it's musical, which since I've not kept up with popular music since the Beatles it's understandable I'll miss them. Often it's what critics like to call "homages" or "call-outs" to other programming. Those I miss as well.
I think it's "Billions", the third season of which we just finished, which made me particularly aware of this. It's possible it's just the writers of that show who are especially into references to other pieces of popular culture, but it seems more pervasive. Although there are fewer directors' commentaries these days now that Netflix is shifting from DVD's to streaming, they're another way I become conscious of things I'm missing.
It seems a logical trend in our culture: the more time people spend watching and listening, the more likely creators will cross-reference things. I suspect the trend also means fewer references to the older sources of reference material: the classics and the Bible.
Sometimes it's musical, which since I've not kept up with popular music since the Beatles it's understandable I'll miss them. Often it's what critics like to call "homages" or "call-outs" to other programming. Those I miss as well.
I think it's "Billions", the third season of which we just finished, which made me particularly aware of this. It's possible it's just the writers of that show who are especially into references to other pieces of popular culture, but it seems more pervasive. Although there are fewer directors' commentaries these days now that Netflix is shifting from DVD's to streaming, they're another way I become conscious of things I'm missing.
It seems a logical trend in our culture: the more time people spend watching and listening, the more likely creators will cross-reference things. I suspect the trend also means fewer references to the older sources of reference material: the classics and the Bible.
Sunday, April 21, 2019
The Continuing Effects of the Irish Potato Famine
Stumbled across a piece on the Irish potato famine. Its effects varied in different parts of the island, hitting particularly hard in the south and west, areas which were much more dependent on the potato and had fewer other resources.
While many died and many left, others moved within Ireland, moving north and east to Belfast and Dublin. For the former, the writer observed that where Belfast used to be almost entirely Protestant, because of the internal migrants being Catholic it became a more divided place. (I'm not sure whether Catholics also moved to other places in Ulster.) Those divisions led to the "Troubles" of the last pat of the 20th century, which led to the importance of the peace agreement in British and Irish politics, which led to the Brexit conundrum Incidentally, it reminds me of the anecdote about the horse who get hung up jumping a fence.
While many died and many left, others moved within Ireland, moving north and east to Belfast and Dublin. For the former, the writer observed that where Belfast used to be almost entirely Protestant, because of the internal migrants being Catholic it became a more divided place. (I'm not sure whether Catholics also moved to other places in Ulster.) Those divisions led to the "Troubles" of the last pat of the 20th century, which led to the importance of the peace agreement in British and Irish politics, which led to the Brexit conundrum Incidentally, it reminds me of the anecdote about the horse who get hung up jumping a fence.
Saturday, April 20, 2019
The Dilemma of Trump's Appointees
The Mueller report has shown the tightrope which Trump's appointees must walk, particularly in the case of Don McGahn. It's a question of how far you go in appeasing your boss, versus compromising your own ethics.
As an ex-bureaucrat who had some people among my superiors whom I didn't much respect, I've some empathy for the McGahns of the current administration. That perhaps leads me to undeserved sympathy for AG Barr. He's gotten criticism for his summary of the Mueller report, spinning the conclusions to be the most favorable to his boss. That's deserved. But we need to remember that he did succeed in getting the Mueller report released, although with redactions. That's not something I would have predicted back when he was nominated. It's possible he regards the release as serving the public interest, a release important enough to justify his tactics in getting the release past his boss. (Will Trump start blasting Barr for the release? Maybe.)
As an ex-bureaucrat who had some people among my superiors whom I didn't much respect, I've some empathy for the McGahns of the current administration. That perhaps leads me to undeserved sympathy for AG Barr. He's gotten criticism for his summary of the Mueller report, spinning the conclusions to be the most favorable to his boss. That's deserved. But we need to remember that he did succeed in getting the Mueller report released, although with redactions. That's not something I would have predicted back when he was nominated. It's possible he regards the release as serving the public interest, a release important enough to justify his tactics in getting the release past his boss. (Will Trump start blasting Barr for the release? Maybe.)
Vertical Integration for Dairy?
A comment in this twitter thread suggested that some form of vertical integration would be coming for the dairy industry, as it has for poultry and hogs.
That makes sense to me. Dairy is under more and more pressure--the other day I found not 3 but 5 thermos of "milk" at the Starbucks counter--to the usual nonfat, milk, and half and half they'd added soy and another "milk" which I forget now.
With the divorcing of cows from pasture and the proliferation of robotic milkers the capital cost is only going up.
And finally there seems to be closer ties between outlets, like Walmart, and their suppliers.
Maybe another 15 or so years there will be only smaller, "truly organic" dairies feeding a niche market and perhaps encouraging tourists who experience nostalgia, and the big operations with 5 digits worth of cows.
Friday, April 19, 2019
The Answer Is Google, Always Google
Supposedly intelligent people still aren't current with the modern world. Two instances:
- Mr. Kushner tried to find out the name of the Russian ambassador to the US (that's in the Mueller report) in late 2016. So he called someone who might know.
- Scott Adams tweeted out a reward of $100 to the first person who could tell him how to change the footnotes in a Word document from "i, ii, iii..." to "1, 2, 3".
In both cases simply typing the question into Google would have produced the answer in a matter of seconds.
I hope our young are learning this lesson better than their seniors (both of whom could be my children, God forbid).
Thursday, April 18, 2019
Score One for Neustadt
One conclusion from the Mueller report is that prof. Neustadt, author of the classic book on Presidential Power, wins again.
His thesis was that presidential power was not automatic, not like starting a car and driving it, but it was a matter of respect and reputation. Certainly Trump has little of either, hence his attempts at obstruction were foiled by resistance of his subordinates to carrying out his orders. Nixon had his "Germans", Erlichman and Haldeman, who'd carry out his orders. Not so Trump.
His thesis was that presidential power was not automatic, not like starting a car and driving it, but it was a matter of respect and reputation. Certainly Trump has little of either, hence his attempts at obstruction were foiled by resistance of his subordinates to carrying out his orders. Nixon had his "Germans", Erlichman and Haldeman, who'd carry out his orders. Not so Trump.
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Paul Coates
I followed the blog Ta-Nehisi Coates hosted for several years and read his first book, a memoir. So I found this interview with his father quite interesting, particularly as he's about my age.
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Controlled Environment Agriculture
Quartz has this entitled "The Urban Farming Revolution has a fatal flaw. (see the source at the end of this post).
I'm sorely tempted to write "I told you so", since I've been skeptical of vertical farming and similar efforts in cities. On a fast read it seems the drawbacks are: cost of urban real estate, cost of energy for lighting, low nutritional content of the greens usually grown, and the premium prices charged. The study was of New York City "controlled environment agriculture" (CEA) farms, which gives me a new term for a label.
I would think some of the factors are more serious than others. Roof top farming in NYC might be susceptible to competition from other uses, like leisure and recreation I'm not clear how much cheaper and more efficient LED lights can be, but I'm hesitant to rule out further innovation. The ability and willingness of people to pay premium prices is likely growing.
In a larger sense, CEA is what farmer have been doing since the dawn of agriculture: arrtificially changing the environment for plants and animals to grow faster, better, more disease free, etc. etc. Outside the city it looks as if "precision agriculture" (PA) is the approach taken.
Will the CEA and PA sets of innovation start to merge at some point? Stay tuned.
Source: Goodman et. al. “Will the urban agricultural revolution be vertical and soilless? A case study of controlled environment agriculture in New York City.” Land Use Policy. 2019.
I'm sorely tempted to write "I told you so", since I've been skeptical of vertical farming and similar efforts in cities. On a fast read it seems the drawbacks are: cost of urban real estate, cost of energy for lighting, low nutritional content of the greens usually grown, and the premium prices charged. The study was of New York City "controlled environment agriculture" (CEA) farms, which gives me a new term for a label.
I would think some of the factors are more serious than others. Roof top farming in NYC might be susceptible to competition from other uses, like leisure and recreation I'm not clear how much cheaper and more efficient LED lights can be, but I'm hesitant to rule out further innovation. The ability and willingness of people to pay premium prices is likely growing.
In a larger sense, CEA is what farmer have been doing since the dawn of agriculture: arrtificially changing the environment for plants and animals to grow faster, better, more disease free, etc. etc. Outside the city it looks as if "precision agriculture" (PA) is the approach taken.
Will the CEA and PA sets of innovation start to merge at some point? Stay tuned.
Source: Goodman et. al. “Will the urban agricultural revolution be vertical and soilless? A case study of controlled environment agriculture in New York City.” Land Use Policy. 2019.
This piece was originally published on Anthropocene Magazine, a publication of Future Earth dedicated to creating a Human Age we actually want to live in.
Monday, April 15, 2019
Community Effects: Measles Versus Eastern High
The outbreaks of measles have focused attention on community effects. When a high percentage of the community has been vaccinated, there's herd immunity--the virus can't maintain itself. So the choices made by individual families affect the whole community.
By chance the Post Sunday had a good article on the choice faced by a white family on Capitol Hill Their teenage daughter was in an integrated DC intermediate school,but now is facing the decision of which high school to attend. Does she go to Eastern, the local high school, almost entirely black (like the intermediate school) with known problems and the possibility it's on the upswing, or travel across town to a selective public high school.
On the one hand the daughter gets greater certainty of a good and challenging education with less risk of a bad experience; on the other hand she might be missing a unique experience and, more importantly, she contributes a bit to the community effect.
Recent research on upward mobility has shown the importance of community effects: the better the community by our customary standards (two-parent families, etc.) the better everyone does, particularly the poor.
I'm not an anti-vaxer, but I think it's true a measles vaccination carries a risk, a very small risk, to the individual. But the risk to the individual is outweighed by the benefits to the community if everyone gets vaccinated, or at least in the neighborhood of 95+ percent. So I've no problem in saying the individual should be vaccinated, and mandatory vaccination laws are good. But why would I, and the liberal parents of the daughter in the Post article, hesitate to require her to attend her neighborhood school? I think the answer is the probable cost to the individual is much higher and the probable benefit to the community, in the absence of many others in the same situation is minimal, meaning the tradeoff is unfair.
While that calculus seems to be convincing, it leaves the $64,000 question of how do we get positive community effects: how do you get a herd, a crowd, all moving in the same positive direction?
By chance the Post Sunday had a good article on the choice faced by a white family on Capitol Hill Their teenage daughter was in an integrated DC intermediate school,but now is facing the decision of which high school to attend. Does she go to Eastern, the local high school, almost entirely black (like the intermediate school) with known problems and the possibility it's on the upswing, or travel across town to a selective public high school.
On the one hand the daughter gets greater certainty of a good and challenging education with less risk of a bad experience; on the other hand she might be missing a unique experience and, more importantly, she contributes a bit to the community effect.
Recent research on upward mobility has shown the importance of community effects: the better the community by our customary standards (two-parent families, etc.) the better everyone does, particularly the poor.
I'm not an anti-vaxer, but I think it's true a measles vaccination carries a risk, a very small risk, to the individual. But the risk to the individual is outweighed by the benefits to the community if everyone gets vaccinated, or at least in the neighborhood of 95+ percent. So I've no problem in saying the individual should be vaccinated, and mandatory vaccination laws are good. But why would I, and the liberal parents of the daughter in the Post article, hesitate to require her to attend her neighborhood school? I think the answer is the probable cost to the individual is much higher and the probable benefit to the community, in the absence of many others in the same situation is minimal, meaning the tradeoff is unfair.
While that calculus seems to be convincing, it leaves the $64,000 question of how do we get positive community effects: how do you get a herd, a crowd, all moving in the same positive direction?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)