The Mueller report has shown the tightrope which Trump's appointees must walk, particularly in the case of Don McGahn. It's a question of how far you go in appeasing your boss, versus compromising your own ethics.
As an ex-bureaucrat who had some people among my superiors whom I didn't much respect, I've some empathy for the McGahns of the current administration. That perhaps leads me to undeserved sympathy for AG Barr. He's gotten criticism for his summary of the Mueller report, spinning the conclusions to be the most favorable to his boss. That's deserved. But we need to remember that he did succeed in getting the Mueller report released, although with redactions. That's not something I would have predicted back when he was nominated. It's possible he regards the release as serving the public interest, a release important enough to justify his tactics in getting the release past his boss. (Will Trump start blasting Barr for the release? Maybe.)
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Saturday, April 20, 2019
Vertical Integration for Dairy?
A comment in this twitter thread suggested that some form of vertical integration would be coming for the dairy industry, as it has for poultry and hogs.
That makes sense to me. Dairy is under more and more pressure--the other day I found not 3 but 5 thermos of "milk" at the Starbucks counter--to the usual nonfat, milk, and half and half they'd added soy and another "milk" which I forget now.
With the divorcing of cows from pasture and the proliferation of robotic milkers the capital cost is only going up.
And finally there seems to be closer ties between outlets, like Walmart, and their suppliers.
Maybe another 15 or so years there will be only smaller, "truly organic" dairies feeding a niche market and perhaps encouraging tourists who experience nostalgia, and the big operations with 5 digits worth of cows.
Friday, April 19, 2019
The Answer Is Google, Always Google
Supposedly intelligent people still aren't current with the modern world. Two instances:
- Mr. Kushner tried to find out the name of the Russian ambassador to the US (that's in the Mueller report) in late 2016. So he called someone who might know.
- Scott Adams tweeted out a reward of $100 to the first person who could tell him how to change the footnotes in a Word document from "i, ii, iii..." to "1, 2, 3".
In both cases simply typing the question into Google would have produced the answer in a matter of seconds.
I hope our young are learning this lesson better than their seniors (both of whom could be my children, God forbid).
Thursday, April 18, 2019
Score One for Neustadt
One conclusion from the Mueller report is that prof. Neustadt, author of the classic book on Presidential Power, wins again.
His thesis was that presidential power was not automatic, not like starting a car and driving it, but it was a matter of respect and reputation. Certainly Trump has little of either, hence his attempts at obstruction were foiled by resistance of his subordinates to carrying out his orders. Nixon had his "Germans", Erlichman and Haldeman, who'd carry out his orders. Not so Trump.
His thesis was that presidential power was not automatic, not like starting a car and driving it, but it was a matter of respect and reputation. Certainly Trump has little of either, hence his attempts at obstruction were foiled by resistance of his subordinates to carrying out his orders. Nixon had his "Germans", Erlichman and Haldeman, who'd carry out his orders. Not so Trump.
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Paul Coates
I followed the blog Ta-Nehisi Coates hosted for several years and read his first book, a memoir. So I found this interview with his father quite interesting, particularly as he's about my age.
Tuesday, April 16, 2019
Controlled Environment Agriculture
Quartz has this entitled "The Urban Farming Revolution has a fatal flaw. (see the source at the end of this post).
I'm sorely tempted to write "I told you so", since I've been skeptical of vertical farming and similar efforts in cities. On a fast read it seems the drawbacks are: cost of urban real estate, cost of energy for lighting, low nutritional content of the greens usually grown, and the premium prices charged. The study was of New York City "controlled environment agriculture" (CEA) farms, which gives me a new term for a label.
I would think some of the factors are more serious than others. Roof top farming in NYC might be susceptible to competition from other uses, like leisure and recreation I'm not clear how much cheaper and more efficient LED lights can be, but I'm hesitant to rule out further innovation. The ability and willingness of people to pay premium prices is likely growing.
In a larger sense, CEA is what farmer have been doing since the dawn of agriculture: arrtificially changing the environment for plants and animals to grow faster, better, more disease free, etc. etc. Outside the city it looks as if "precision agriculture" (PA) is the approach taken.
Will the CEA and PA sets of innovation start to merge at some point? Stay tuned.
Source: Goodman et. al. “Will the urban agricultural revolution be vertical and soilless? A case study of controlled environment agriculture in New York City.” Land Use Policy. 2019.
I'm sorely tempted to write "I told you so", since I've been skeptical of vertical farming and similar efforts in cities. On a fast read it seems the drawbacks are: cost of urban real estate, cost of energy for lighting, low nutritional content of the greens usually grown, and the premium prices charged. The study was of New York City "controlled environment agriculture" (CEA) farms, which gives me a new term for a label.
I would think some of the factors are more serious than others. Roof top farming in NYC might be susceptible to competition from other uses, like leisure and recreation I'm not clear how much cheaper and more efficient LED lights can be, but I'm hesitant to rule out further innovation. The ability and willingness of people to pay premium prices is likely growing.
In a larger sense, CEA is what farmer have been doing since the dawn of agriculture: arrtificially changing the environment for plants and animals to grow faster, better, more disease free, etc. etc. Outside the city it looks as if "precision agriculture" (PA) is the approach taken.
Will the CEA and PA sets of innovation start to merge at some point? Stay tuned.
Source: Goodman et. al. “Will the urban agricultural revolution be vertical and soilless? A case study of controlled environment agriculture in New York City.” Land Use Policy. 2019.
This piece was originally published on Anthropocene Magazine, a publication of Future Earth dedicated to creating a Human Age we actually want to live in.
Monday, April 15, 2019
Community Effects: Measles Versus Eastern High
The outbreaks of measles have focused attention on community effects. When a high percentage of the community has been vaccinated, there's herd immunity--the virus can't maintain itself. So the choices made by individual families affect the whole community.
By chance the Post Sunday had a good article on the choice faced by a white family on Capitol Hill Their teenage daughter was in an integrated DC intermediate school,but now is facing the decision of which high school to attend. Does she go to Eastern, the local high school, almost entirely black (like the intermediate school) with known problems and the possibility it's on the upswing, or travel across town to a selective public high school.
On the one hand the daughter gets greater certainty of a good and challenging education with less risk of a bad experience; on the other hand she might be missing a unique experience and, more importantly, she contributes a bit to the community effect.
Recent research on upward mobility has shown the importance of community effects: the better the community by our customary standards (two-parent families, etc.) the better everyone does, particularly the poor.
I'm not an anti-vaxer, but I think it's true a measles vaccination carries a risk, a very small risk, to the individual. But the risk to the individual is outweighed by the benefits to the community if everyone gets vaccinated, or at least in the neighborhood of 95+ percent. So I've no problem in saying the individual should be vaccinated, and mandatory vaccination laws are good. But why would I, and the liberal parents of the daughter in the Post article, hesitate to require her to attend her neighborhood school? I think the answer is the probable cost to the individual is much higher and the probable benefit to the community, in the absence of many others in the same situation is minimal, meaning the tradeoff is unfair.
While that calculus seems to be convincing, it leaves the $64,000 question of how do we get positive community effects: how do you get a herd, a crowd, all moving in the same positive direction?
By chance the Post Sunday had a good article on the choice faced by a white family on Capitol Hill Their teenage daughter was in an integrated DC intermediate school,but now is facing the decision of which high school to attend. Does she go to Eastern, the local high school, almost entirely black (like the intermediate school) with known problems and the possibility it's on the upswing, or travel across town to a selective public high school.
On the one hand the daughter gets greater certainty of a good and challenging education with less risk of a bad experience; on the other hand she might be missing a unique experience and, more importantly, she contributes a bit to the community effect.
Recent research on upward mobility has shown the importance of community effects: the better the community by our customary standards (two-parent families, etc.) the better everyone does, particularly the poor.
I'm not an anti-vaxer, but I think it's true a measles vaccination carries a risk, a very small risk, to the individual. But the risk to the individual is outweighed by the benefits to the community if everyone gets vaccinated, or at least in the neighborhood of 95+ percent. So I've no problem in saying the individual should be vaccinated, and mandatory vaccination laws are good. But why would I, and the liberal parents of the daughter in the Post article, hesitate to require her to attend her neighborhood school? I think the answer is the probable cost to the individual is much higher and the probable benefit to the community, in the absence of many others in the same situation is minimal, meaning the tradeoff is unfair.
While that calculus seems to be convincing, it leaves the $64,000 question of how do we get positive community effects: how do you get a herd, a crowd, all moving in the same positive direction?
Saturday, April 13, 2019
On Recognizing Faces
Saw a piece in the Post about people remembering when schools in Arlington integrated. Several interesting points, but I liked this one:
"He chuckled as he recalled his reaction to so many new faces. “The only white kids I knew were the families on TV, like ‘Leave It to Beaver,’ ” he said. “They talk about all black people look alike? It took me months to distinguish one white face from another.”IMHO facial recognition is a combination of experience and capability--that's my story.. I regard myself as having problems with both, so it's reassuring when I find others have similar problems, confirming my narrative.
Friday, April 12, 2019
Samuelson and Education
He concludes education programs have failed, because they haven't changed the gaps between ethnic groups.
Logically it's possible that they've been successful, in that in their absence the gap would have widened. It's possible over 60 years the amount of knowledge to be imparted has increased a bit. A simile: education is like rowing a boat up a river. Over the years we may have improved the oars, gotten the rowers more fit, etc., but meanwhile the flow of water down the river has increased, so the boat stays in roughly the same place.
Logically it's possible that they've been successful, in that in their absence the gap would have widened. It's possible over 60 years the amount of knowledge to be imparted has increased a bit. A simile: education is like rowing a boat up a river. Over the years we may have improved the oars, gotten the rowers more fit, etc., but meanwhile the flow of water down the river has increased, so the boat stays in roughly the same place.
Thursday, April 11, 2019
Corporate Transparency: Canadians Are Ahead of Us
This article shows that at least one Canadian province is going where the US ought to be (and FSA is getting to): recording the real people behind paper entities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)