Only in part. Here's the Politico piece on Perdue's telling 2,500 employees to return on Jan 17, 18, and 22.
And here's the USDA press release.
And here's the list of offices which will open. (My impression is that a smaller share of offices in the Northeast are being reopened than in the rest of the country. They may have given preference to locations with heavy MFP activity?)
I wonder how they determined the employees to call back? All CED's of offices they're reopening? Might not be the best employees to have.
I wonder what happens after Monday?
Will be interesting to see how this works out.
And here's a NASCOE explainer from yesterday. (Thumbs up to NASCOE for the post.)
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
It's All Downhill from Here
This month I got my first hearing aid. Today I was told I need my first dental crown.
My health has been generally good up to now--no hospital stays, no broken bones, etc. But it's all downhill from here.
My health has been generally good up to now--no hospital stays, no broken bones, etc. But it's all downhill from here.
Monday, January 14, 2019
Small Dairy? Test Farm
The Times today had an article on a supposed small farm; actually a billionaire's test farm (i.e. playtoy given my cynical mood today) trying out various systems intended for small farms.
It's call Rivendale (it doesn't tweet much).
The article is frustrating--apparently one person is mostly responsible for the 175 milking Jerseys, using an automated feeding system and $200,000 robotic milking systems. The cows determine when they are milked (4 times a day) and produce 15 percent more. But it's not clear whether it's their breeding or the milking system which is responsible for the gain.
What I'd like to know, among other things:
It's call Rivendale (it doesn't tweet much).
The article is frustrating--apparently one person is mostly responsible for the 175 milking Jerseys, using an automated feeding system and $200,000 robotic milking systems. The cows determine when they are milked (4 times a day) and produce 15 percent more. But it's not clear whether it's their breeding or the milking system which is responsible for the gain.
What I'd like to know, among other things:
- what's the expected life of these robotic systems? 3 year, 5 year, 8 years, 10 years?
- how much maintenance and downtime do they require? my guess is 4 systems means that 3 systems can handle the 175 with the fourth providing for some backup and fudge factor.
- what happens when Murphy's law strikes and the systems go down? With the systems I grew up with, as long as you had electricity you could milk cows. Without electricity, it was hand milking.
- can the farmhand handle the technology or does it require a tech?
- how does the feeding system handle the "non-processed feed" they claim to be using?
- what's the overall picture--are the cows on pasture or is it a CAFO?
Saturday, January 12, 2019
John Boyd on BBC
Since I mentioned Boyd's appearance in a Post article, I should give equal time to the BBC, where a sound bite from Boyd was included in their piece on the impact of the partial shutdown of the government.
In fairness to Boyd, I suspect he has a reputation for giving good quotes to the media--he's articulate. In the last century I was bit dubious of him, thinking he was more a paper farmer than a real one. But apparently he's (re?)married with kids now and still going with soybeans, getting older along with all the rest of us.
In fairness to Boyd, I suspect he has a reputation for giving good quotes to the media--he's articulate. In the last century I was bit dubious of him, thinking he was more a paper farmer than a real one. But apparently he's (re?)married with kids now and still going with soybeans, getting older along with all the rest of us.
Friday, January 11, 2019
John Boyd and the Shutdown of FSA
When the Post wanted a farmer to talk about the hardships caused by the shutdown of FSA one of the ones they found was John Boyd. See yesterday's article.
Forgive me for finding it ironic that Boyd still depends in part on the agency which he sued. Just another proof that life is complicated, as are people.
Forgive me for finding it ironic that Boyd still depends in part on the agency which he sued. Just another proof that life is complicated, as are people.
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Fences and Landowning in the Post
Marc Fisher had an article in the Post about walls, which touched on fences, which included a quote from an expert which I found to be wrong!! I commented there, which I'll copy here:
"From the nation’s earliest days, when only white male landowners could vote, many built fences on their land to show their neighbors they were eligible voters, Dreicer [the expert] said."
This is irrelevant to the theme of the article. Irrelevant because a fence to mark boundaries of ownership isn't like a wall. Think of our northern boundary: it's marked, but neither fenced nor walled. We have the symbol of ownership (US sovereignty ends and Canadian begins) without needing a physical barrier.
Land ownership in the 13 colonies was marked by the metes and bounds system
But I call BS--I'm sure Dreicer never built a fence. A fence requires work, both to build it the first time (particularly stone wall fences but even split rail fences) and work to maintain. You don't build a fence to declare ownership; you build a fence to keep animals in or out. That's why we used to have fence viewers. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fence_Viewer. BTW there are interesting regional and historical differences whether a landowner was required to fence his/her animals in, or to fence to keep free-ranging animals out.
Wednesday, January 09, 2019
Our Decentralized Systems
John Phipps twitted about this piece, specifically this:
This industry, and in particular the few groups who control the narrative, need to actually just agree and make one darn file type used to transfer and create data.I know this has and is being tried and there are a plethora of ways to go about it. Also, there are legacy systems and what not. We are not going to progress much more unless this finally gets solved though. Let us “you know what” or get off the pot.I commented, comparing this problem with the problem of incompatible data sets in the healthcare industry. I think this is a general feature of American society and economy: with a federal system, the size of the country and its population, the market economy, and our history we don't have centralized systems comparable to those in France or in Estonia
Tuesday, January 08, 2019
First American Cotton Mill and Eli Whitney
On Dec. 20 there was mention of the anniversary of the first American cotton mill. What struck me at the time, though I'm just getting around to commenting, is the date: 1790.
Why is the date significant? Well, we all know there was no cotton industry before Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, which was in 1794. So what was Samuel Slater's factory spinning in 1790 and after, if no cotton was available?
The answer, of course, was cotton, and the point I'm trying to make is our mental picture of history is wrong. In fact cotton was grown and de-seeded for centuries, in all continents except Antarctica. The thing about cotton, as you can see if your aspirin bottle has a wad of cotton to suppress rattles, is it's light so a little goes a long way. Try weighing the cotton clothes you're wearing now--they're light. So if the elementary ginning tools in use before Whitney's invention could process a pound of cotton a day that would be sufficient for a lot of yarn and then weaving a fair amount of cloth.
Why is the date significant? Well, we all know there was no cotton industry before Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, which was in 1794. So what was Samuel Slater's factory spinning in 1790 and after, if no cotton was available?
The answer, of course, was cotton, and the point I'm trying to make is our mental picture of history is wrong. In fact cotton was grown and de-seeded for centuries, in all continents except Antarctica. The thing about cotton, as you can see if your aspirin bottle has a wad of cotton to suppress rattles, is it's light so a little goes a long way. Try weighing the cotton clothes you're wearing now--they're light. So if the elementary ginning tools in use before Whitney's invention could process a pound of cotton a day that would be sufficient for a lot of yarn and then weaving a fair amount of cloth.
Monday, January 07, 2019
Taxation Policy and Staffing
I commented on a Noah Smith tweet a couple days ago, a thread discussing tax policy. AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) has gotten notoriety by proposing a tax bracket of $10 million and above with a rate of 70 percent.
I've not followed the debate enough to know what, if anything, she or others have proposed for the current brackets and rates. Personally I'd add more brackets (because "simplicity" isn't important when you use software packages to file your taxes, with increasing rates. And I'd have no problem with the 70 percent proposal.
What I do have problems with is IRS staffing. IMHO the first priority for Democrats is to try to get bipartisan agreement on improving IRS staffing and administration, by which I mean something like doubling the auditors of richer people. One of my early blog posts was to complain about a then-celebrity evading taxes. As an ex-bureaucrat, I want people to follow the rules, damn it.
I've not followed the debate enough to know what, if anything, she or others have proposed for the current brackets and rates. Personally I'd add more brackets (because "simplicity" isn't important when you use software packages to file your taxes, with increasing rates. And I'd have no problem with the 70 percent proposal.
What I do have problems with is IRS staffing. IMHO the first priority for Democrats is to try to get bipartisan agreement on improving IRS staffing and administration, by which I mean something like doubling the auditors of richer people. One of my early blog posts was to complain about a then-celebrity evading taxes. As an ex-bureaucrat, I want people to follow the rules, damn it.
Sunday, January 06, 2019
Kentucky Dairy Farms Fading
The Rural Blog had a post on the plight of Kentucky dairy farms recently. A lowlight:
In Kentucky, more than 10 percent of dairy farms shuttered in 2018, lowering the count to 513, down from 1,400 in 2005, Bill Estep reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader.I don't know what the reduction in cow numbers was--Estep wrote: ""Farm Aid pointed to Walmart’s new Indiana processing plant as a example of large players taking over more of the milk-supply chain. Large companies with processing plants typically would rather deal with a few large farms than many smaller ones,"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)