I see I'm late in realizing that Candy has been appointed to be Associate Administrator for Administration and Operations and her bio hasn't been posted yet. I remember her 27 years ago when she and Chris Niedermayer were in Kansas City working on testing the price support software for the system/36.
For all the newbies, yes, it's true that we walked to and from Ward Parkway uphill both ways in the snow barefoot. Those were the days.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Animal Rights/Welfare
Extension.org has a series of posts in this area. Here's one on cages and chickens.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
What Was on Their Minds in 1787?
Stumbled on an item from New Jersey in 1787. After the NJ convention had ratified the new constitution, they adjourned to a tavern to celebrate. "After dinner, the following toasts were drank:
Ditto. Universal liberty, justice and peace. "
- The new constitution
- The united states in congress.
- The president and members of the late federal convention.
- The governor and state of New Jersey.
- The states of Delaware and Pennsylvania.
- May the independence of the union, reared on the basis of the new constitution, be perpetual.
- The princes and states in alliance with the united states.
- May the interest of the united states be ever deemed the interest of each state.
- Religion, learning, agriculture, arts, manufactures, and commerce, in harmony and mutual subserviency to each other.
- The memory and posterity of those who have falled in the late war.
- May the gratitude of the American citizens be equal to the valour and patriotism of the American soldiery.
- The daughters of America.
- May the united states be the asylum of invaded liberty.
Ditto. Universal liberty, justice and peace. "
Stolen From DeLong: 14th Century
"A Commonplace Book: Buying Power of 14th Century Money:
"In the second half of the 14th century, a pound sterling would: (i)
Support the lifestyle of a single peasant laborer for half a year, or
that of a knight for a week. Or buy: (ii)( Three changes of clothing for
a teenage page (underclothes not included) or (iii) Twelve pounds of
sugar or (iv) A carthorse or (v) Two cows or (vi) An inexpensive bible
or (vii) ten ordinary books or (viii) Rent a craftsman’s townhouse for a
year or (ix) Hire a servant for six months…. It should be obvious from
the above list that the conversion rate depends a great deal on what you
buy…""
Stole this from Brad DeLong verbatim. Can't wrap my head around the various conversions. It seems a knight is worth 26 times a peasant or a servant. That's not a bad ratio, given the relationship of the wages of modern CEO's and their lowest employees, but it would seem bad to anyone before 1970.
Stole this from Brad DeLong verbatim. Can't wrap my head around the various conversions. It seems a knight is worth 26 times a peasant or a servant. That's not a bad ratio, given the relationship of the wages of modern CEO's and their lowest employees, but it would seem bad to anyone before 1970.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Industrial Farming and "Soiling Cattle"
"Industrial farming" usually includes "factory farming". I think the usual assumption is that in the good old days, as when I grew up, dairy cattle were pastured and only recently have they been confined with the feed brought to them. As is often the case, that assumption is wrong. It seems in the old days "soiling cattle" was a recognized method, promoted in this Google book of 1874. Other references found by Google are earlier.
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Gun Nuts Should Use Puritans, Not Hitler
Politico has an article where the Anti-defamation League warns against using Hitler in the context of the current debates over gun safety. That's fine, but one does need an extreme example in any political argument, so I'll offer one: the Massachusetts Puritans. I'm reading Bernard Bailyn's Barbarous Years which is interesting. He observes that in the early days of the Bay Colony, when there was a raging conflict between Wheelwright and Hutchinson and the leaders of the colony (I'm sure that was covered in your history class--Anne Hutchinson being the first prominent woman protestor), the leadership took the step of confiscating all the arms possessed by the 60-70 people who supported the dissidents.
So instead of using a photo of Hitler, use one of the standard pictures of a Puritan, like John Winthrop, the man who used "city on a hill" before Ronald Reagan.
So instead of using a photo of Hitler, use one of the standard pictures of a Puritan, like John Winthrop, the man who used "city on a hill" before Ronald Reagan.
Friday, January 25, 2013
High Prices at GPO
I've been looking at the history of Washington, DC in the 1800's for a couple different reasons. One is a writing project I may post about later. Anyhow, I'd like to see this book on the Army Corps of Engineer involvement with DC. I've read a bio of Gen. Montgomery Meigs, who engineered the dC water system, bridges, etc. in the 1850's-60's, and was quartermaster general in the Civil War. Also read Liberty's Cap (I think that's the right title), which deals with the process by which the Capitol Building was given its final dome in the same period. So I've got some idea of what might be involved, but this would be interesting.
Look at the price, though: $61.00. I don't understand it at all. Why doesn't the GPO use print on demand? Looking at Amazon, it appears a number of outfits have scanned old books, and are now selling them as print on demand books for amounts in the range of $15-20.
Look at the price, though: $61.00. I don't understand it at all. Why doesn't the GPO use print on demand? Looking at Amazon, it appears a number of outfits have scanned old books, and are now selling them as print on demand books for amounts in the range of $15-20.
Johanns Gets Poor Memory
Thursday, January 24, 2013
COBOL Is Hack Proof
That's the official conclusion of a House committee, at least its head. So old no one understands it enough to hack it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)