Slate has a discussion of the future of robots on the farm. The theory is that young farmers come from outside agriculture so don't mind hand work and don't have the money to invest in expensive robots. On the other hand they're more likely to be techies than the production farmers who are in their 50's, 60's, and 70's, so might be early adopters. So it's a good, decisive on-the-one-hand, but on-the-other article.
I remember the farmers in Sherman County, KS in 1992 were almost all over 40, which the CED saw as an obstacle to adoption of Infoshare then. That's 20 years ago so a lot of them are now retired, and the number of farmers has probably dropped a good bit.
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Friday, June 08, 2012
Why Did It Need a Cloture Vote
The farm bill in the Senate passed its cloture vote with ease, so they can now go on to debate and propose amendments and ultimately vote. I'm curious though whether such a vote has always been needed or whether in the good old days they could just proceed, perhaps by unanimous consent.
Thursday, June 07, 2012
Innovation in Crop Reporting
No, this isn't an instance where FSA has innovated. It's innovation on the crop insurance side, driven by smartphones and private enterprise.
Lake Woebegon and GSA
According to Federal Times:
Last year, 87 percent of General Services Administration employees got bonuses averaging nearly $1,200 per recipient, according to Federal Times' analysis of government data.Some things are just ridiculous.
Farm Bill Is in the News
In both the Post and the Times.
From the Post:
Yes, they're writing about the same piece of legislation.
[Updated: The White House is now supporting it.]
From the Post:
It may the be most tangible symbol yet that the age of austerity has dawned in Washington. The bill, which sets the nation’s agricultural and food policy for the next five years, enjoys rare bipartisan support and could be the only significant piece of deficit-reduction legislation to gain congressional approval this year.The lede from the Times:
At the same time that high crop prices are prompting farmers to expand into millions of acres of land once considered unsuitable for farming, Congress is considering expanding a federal insurance program that reimburses farmers for most losses or drops in prices.
Yes, they're writing about the same piece of legislation.
[Updated: The White House is now supporting it.]
Wednesday, June 06, 2012
FNS and Lost SNAP Cards
A smattering of stories reporting on the Food and Nutrition Service's proposed regulation (out for public comment) permitting states to request justification for issuing a replacement SNAP (food stamp) EBT card when it's the fourth one within a year. Here's the FNS post.
This bothers me, but probably not enough to do the research I'd need to. I'm bothered in part by this language:
But, from the language I quoted I'm not sure that's what's going on.
And my bottom line would be, the default position for the government should be no more forgiving than a commercial bank is.
This bothers me, but probably not enough to do the research I'd need to. I'm bothered in part by this language:
The proposed minimum threshold is based on an analysis by FNS of electronic transaction data that demonstrates a statistically significant difference when a client reaches his or her fourth replacement card, indicating that transaction activity is three times more likely to be flagged as potential trafficking, which is the exchange of benefits for cash or other consideration, compared to clients with three or fewer replacement cards.Now I'd assume the EBT cards operate like a debit card; lose one, you notify the issuer and they put a hold on the account and you get a new card. I can understand that some of the SNAP recipients are prone to lose their cards; while not a recipient I've trouble losing things as my senility comes on faster. So what I would imagine happens: recipient goes to the store on Monday and uses the card. Recipient absent-mindedly puts the card in the trash on the way out. Recipient needs the card on Wednesday and finds it's missing. Recipient notifies issuer. If someone found the card and used it, then there'd be a couple days of transactions. So I could handle issuing a replacement with no more justification than "I lost it and can't find it" and having the government cover the transaction costs.. And it'd probably be hard to differentiate between the misuse of a found card and the use of a card sold by the SNAP recipient, just by looking at the transactions.
But, from the language I quoted I'm not sure that's what's going on.
And my bottom line would be, the default position for the government should be no more forgiving than a commercial bank is.
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
Obama's Personal Economic Stimulus: Eating Out
See this post at Ezra Klein showing the impact of a POTUS visit on a sandwich shop.
Failure To Rescue
That's the theme of Atul Gawande's commencement address (hat tip Ezra Klein). Worth reading, since failure is inevitable, and recognizing and responding to failure is valuable. Unfortunately in government sometimes the people (political appointees) who fail are out the door before they have the chance to learn from their mistakes.
[Update: Orin Kerr at Volokh provides excerpts of two good commencement speeches, particularly the one on the role of luck in life.]
[Update: Orin Kerr at Volokh provides excerpts of two good commencement speeches, particularly the one on the role of luck in life.]
White House Garden Book: No Politics, No Gardening
A couple reviews of Mrs. Obama's book are in. Grist says there's no politics in it (in the sense of urging political action to change food or garden policies); Obamafoodorama says there's no real how-to gardening in it. Here's an earlier post on it: there's also no Obama daughters in it.
The Good Old Days of Steel and Coal
Erik Loomis at Lawyers, Guns and Money posts 1940 pictures of Pittsburgh. A reminder that government works.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)