That's the theme of Atul Gawande's commencement address (hat tip Ezra Klein). Worth reading, since failure is inevitable, and recognizing and responding to failure is valuable. Unfortunately in government sometimes the people (political appointees) who fail are out the door before they have the chance to learn from their mistakes.
[Update: Orin Kerr at Volokh provides excerpts of two good commencement speeches, particularly the one on the role of luck in life.]
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
White House Garden Book: No Politics, No Gardening
A couple reviews of Mrs. Obama's book are in. Grist says there's no politics in it (in the sense of urging political action to change food or garden policies); Obamafoodorama says there's no real how-to gardening in it. Here's an earlier post on it: there's also no Obama daughters in it.
The Good Old Days of Steel and Coal
Erik Loomis at Lawyers, Guns and Money posts 1940 pictures of Pittsburgh. A reminder that government works.
Monday, June 04, 2012
Racism Among the Establishment
Conservatives often point out quite fairly that eugenics was often a strong thread of Progressive thought: it fit the Progressive optimism that everything can be understood and once understood can be improved.
However, I just finished the Jean Smith bio of Eisenhower. It was interesting, moves along very well, sides with Montgomery in a couple instances and accuses Ike of spin (heaven forbid) in places, thinks well of Ike generally, but has a few howlers of errors which one may perhaps forgive on account of the author's advancing age (1.6 million sq ft in the White House?).
Back to racism: the pre-WWII military officer class was part of the WASP establishment (Patton loaned Stimson his horses to ride) and racism was common throughout, though not necessarily in the bedroom (witness McArthur and his mistress). This isn't a theme of Smith's, but it comes through in several places.
However, I just finished the Jean Smith bio of Eisenhower. It was interesting, moves along very well, sides with Montgomery in a couple instances and accuses Ike of spin (heaven forbid) in places, thinks well of Ike generally, but has a few howlers of errors which one may perhaps forgive on account of the author's advancing age (1.6 million sq ft in the White House?).
Back to racism: the pre-WWII military officer class was part of the WASP establishment (Patton loaned Stimson his horses to ride) and racism was common throughout, though not necessarily in the bedroom (witness McArthur and his mistress). This isn't a theme of Smith's, but it comes through in several places.
32-Ounce Drinks
The mayor of NYC is proposing to ban drinks over 16 ounces. Much ado about it.
However the good mayor and I both remember the good old days, though I'm a tad older and a lot poorer.
The Coke bottle we grew up with was 6.5 oz.
However the good mayor and I both remember the good old days, though I'm a tad older and a lot poorer.
The Coke bottle we grew up with was 6.5 oz.
Sunday, June 03, 2012
EWG and Crop Insurance
Politico is just one of several articles on EWG's attack on crop insurance, using data on crop policies and policyholders. (Here's the link.)
will would not find as many city dwellers benefiting from subsidized crop insurance. One of the things EWG seemed to delight in with their database on FSA's payments was the revelation of where recipients lived, particularly in big cities and wealthy ZIP codes. I don't know if FSA and FCIC ever tried to cross-match their producers, but my suspicion is that crop insurance's "producers", those people and entities who are the policyholders, come much closer to matching John Doe's idea of who is a farmer is than do FSA's producers.
Note: I changed "will" to "would" in the previous paragraph because it turns out EWG couldn't get identities of producers; Congress barred it.
In 26 cases, policyholders received an annual discount — carried on the government’s books — of $1 million or more in 2011. In 10,152 cases, it was $100,000 or more, while the vast majority of farmers received far smaller discounts averaging closer to $5,000.Politico points out differences between crop insurance and FSA's farm programs but ignores one. Because of payment limitation, I suspect EWG
“The eye-opening analysis shows crop insurance is not only very expensive,” said Craig Cox, EWG’s senior vice president of agriculture and natural resources, “but also very, very generous to large and highly profitable farm businesses.”
Corn, soybeans, wheat and cotton are among the leading beneficiaries, just as they dominate American agriculture. At the same time, fruit and vegetable growers, which account for about one-fifth of farm receipts, are disproportionately represented since their crops tend to be high priced and therefore more likely subject to higher premiums.
Potatoes, tomatoes, apples, onions and grapes accounted for 36 percent of the high-end subsidies over $1 million, which carried some irony since environmentalists have long favored such specialty crops.
Note: I changed "will" to "would" in the previous paragraph because it turns out EWG couldn't get identities of producers; Congress barred it.
Saturday, June 02, 2012
USDA Techies Represented by Sheep
That seems to be the message here (via Govloop). (At least they didn't use bulls.)
Friday, June 01, 2012
Water Fountain: Bottled Water::Home Phone:Cellphone
In the old days we had public water fountains and landline phones in the home, also pay phone booths in public spaces. These were shared utilities, whether provided by government or family, NGO's or private business.
In the new days everyone carries her own bottled water and her own cellphone; nothing is shared, all is private and individual.
In the new days everyone carries her own bottled water and her own cellphone; nothing is shared, all is private and individual.
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Inflation in Machinery
Via today's Farm Policy, an illustration of the economics of farming at the farmdoc blog (“Machinery Cost Estimates for 2012 and 2013”)
that farmers are price takers: ”
": Prices of new machinery have increased for most machines between 2010 and 2012. For example, the list price of a 215 horsepower tractor in 2012 is $215,000. A comparable sized tractor in 2010 has a list price of $181,500. Between 2010 and 2012, the price of this tractor has increased by 18 percent."Now I don't remember any big price increases on cars or trucks in recent years, so what's happening is the implement manufacturers are raising their prices to what the market will bear, and there's not enough competition to keep the prices down. Any guess as to implement prices if and when corn drops to $3?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)