"Perry is fresh-faced and chipper, just as you would expect a former Texas A&M yell leader [emphasis added] to be. 'He marches up to the lowliest employee, greets them by name, shakes their hand, and looks them in the eye,' says one staffer. 'He's as friendly as a puppy.' ~ Dana Rubin, Texas Monthly
Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Tuesday, August 09, 2011
Another Cheerleader for President?
Much discussion about the probability Texas Gov. Rick Perry will run for President. Some thought the country isn't ready for another conservative Texas Republican as President. That may be, but I know I'm not ready for another Texas cheerleader as President--from a Conor Friedersdorf post on the press descriptions of him:
How'd That Work Out for the Rural Areas: FDR in 1933
Matt Yglesias quotes from FDR's inaugural, in the context of whether Obama is a good leader, but I'm interested in this one sentence:
Hand in hand with this we must frankly recognize the overbalance of population in our industrial centers and, by engaging on a national scale in a redistribution, endeavor to provide a better use of the land for those best fitted for the land.That belief has a long history, and it carries on today, when some in the food movement argue for revivifying rural areas. The New Deal tried, they even had a Resettlement Administration, bits and pieces of which ended up in the Farmers Home Administration and now FSA, but it didn't work as they thought it should. I think the bottom line is: most rural areas (measured in area) in which farming is the main occupation will continue to lose population for the foreseeable future. I note today there's a Mid-Atlantic exposition/conference on precision agriculture coming up; it's the first one. If they can do precision agriculture in this area, that further cuts the need for labor and increases the need for capital, all of which means a further expansion of the size of farms and a further cut in farm population.
Monday, August 08, 2011
Those Good Old Days in Herndon Education
These days Herndon is one of the centers of the Internet. (I believe it's true that as a byproduct of how the Internet evolved, some of the main switches, or whatever the right term is, are located within or nearby Herndon.
But a mere 55 years ago Herndon was still agricultural, as shown in this memory of the school system:
But a mere 55 years ago Herndon was still agricultural, as shown in this memory of the school system:
“If you stood at the back of the original school building, there were four buildings, with a walkway leading to the original gym at the end," McGlincy Reed said. "The home economics building was a free standing cottage including kitchen, living, and dining rooms and, I think, two bedrooms. The cannery was on the far right, but before you got to those buildings, the [home economics] house was on the left and the shop/agricultural department was on the right. The whole site was like a quad arrangement. The cannery was on the grounds and used by anyone in the community.”
Obesity, Food Deserts, and a Paradox
Robin Hanson had a post citing research that there was no relationship between poverty and obesity. That surprised me.
This CDC report shows a strong relationship between ethnicity and obesity--blacks and Hispanics tend to be more obese than whites.
The Paradox Identified
So Hanson looks to be partially right, at least with regards to the U.S. And I didn't get into the research to know how well it distinguishes among the variables: ethnicity versus income. But what's interesting to me is the difference between men and women, particularly for blacks and Mexican-Americans. Why are rich black men thin and poor black women fat (using oversimple language to make the point) and vice versa? That doesn't seem to me to support the concept of "food deserts". Indeed, it seems to confound any general theory: genetics, income, environment, etc.
This CDC report shows a strong relationship between ethnicity and obesity--blacks and Hispanics tend to be more obese than whites.
Between 1988-1994 and 2007-2008 the prevalence of obesity increased (Figure 2):
From 11.6% to 16.7% among non-Hispanic white boys.
From 10.7% to 19.8% among non-Hispanic black boys.
From 14.1% to 26.8% among Mexican-American boys.
- Among men, obesity prevalence is generally similar at all income levels, however, among non-Hispanic black and Mexican-American men those with higher income are more likely to be obese than those with low income.
- Higher income women are less likely to be obese than low income women, but most obese women are not low income.
- There is no significant trend between obesity and education among men. Among women, however, there is a trend, those with college degrees are less likely to be obese compared with less educated women.
- Between 1988–1994 and 2007–2008 the prevalence of obesity increased in adults at all income and education levels.
Among men, obesity prevalence is generally similar at all income levels, with a tendency to be slightly higher at higher income levels.
The Paradox Identified
So Hanson looks to be partially right, at least with regards to the U.S. And I didn't get into the research to know how well it distinguishes among the variables: ethnicity versus income. But what's interesting to me is the difference between men and women, particularly for blacks and Mexican-Americans. Why are rich black men thin and poor black women fat (using oversimple language to make the point) and vice versa? That doesn't seem to me to support the concept of "food deserts". Indeed, it seems to confound any general theory: genetics, income, environment, etc.
Sunday, August 07, 2011
The Best Reform: Firing Low Performers
That's the message STeve Kelman got from SESers.
I'd draw a parallel between evaluating and firing teachers and evaluating and firing other bureaucrats. Teachers can, we assume, be evaluated based on whether their students consistently each year improve. For some bureaucrats we may be able to find similar measures of performance, but for most it's going to be difficult. For both teachers and bureaucrats you have a supervisor whose judgment is going to be invoked in the evaluation and the firing. Unfortunately, I think it's true it's harder to evaluate supervisors than it is their employees.
On a personal note, thinking back over my career I'm not at all sure how I'd evaluate myself as a supervisor: some years and with some employees I was pretty good, with some employees and other years I was poor. Rather reminds me of the director's commentary on "The Hunt for Red October" we watched last night. The director kept saying he wasn't sure whether what he had tried to do came off well.
So, bottom line: while I can agree with the message Mr. Kelman takes away, it's wise to be cautious: a bad supervisor can do a lot of damage.
I'd draw a parallel between evaluating and firing teachers and evaluating and firing other bureaucrats. Teachers can, we assume, be evaluated based on whether their students consistently each year improve. For some bureaucrats we may be able to find similar measures of performance, but for most it's going to be difficult. For both teachers and bureaucrats you have a supervisor whose judgment is going to be invoked in the evaluation and the firing. Unfortunately, I think it's true it's harder to evaluate supervisors than it is their employees.
On a personal note, thinking back over my career I'm not at all sure how I'd evaluate myself as a supervisor: some years and with some employees I was pretty good, with some employees and other years I was poor. Rather reminds me of the director's commentary on "The Hunt for Red October" we watched last night. The director kept saying he wasn't sure whether what he had tried to do came off well.
So, bottom line: while I can agree with the message Mr. Kelman takes away, it's wise to be cautious: a bad supervisor can do a lot of damage.
Saturday, August 06, 2011
Does Anyone Follow Track? Read Long Jump
This is a great piece on long jumps and Carl Lewis. Hat tip to the Browser. I remember Ralph Boston's salad days, if I recall that was just after the breaking of a bunch of different records which seemed unbreakable: 4 minute mile, 7 foot high jump, 16 foot high jump, 60 foot shot put, 10 sec 100 yard dash. In those days track was a major sport, a major amateur sport, along with tennis. College football and basketball were more prominent than their pro counterparts, boxing was big (the Friday night fights with Sugar Ray Robinson, Carmen Basilio, the ageless Archie Moore). Think I'll dream on the glories of yesteryear and skip blogging this weekend.
Big Dairies Means Better Milk?
That's the conclusion of a study of Wisconsin dairies, as summarized at extension.org.
Friday, August 05, 2011
Robots in the Car and the Tractor
Google has a self-driving car project, and now Kinze has a self-driving tractor project. I guess that's how the 5,000 to 15,000 acre farmer is going to be able to keep expanding.
5,000 to 15,000 Acres
From Farm Policy, quoting DTN piece:
Risk on the farm interests me. There have been lots of innovations over the years to reduce risk: vertical integration in poultry, eggs, and pigs; futures; contract farming for popcorn and seed corn, crop insurance, disaster payment programs, production adjustment and marketing quota programs, etc. But farming evolves; the less risk in one area perhaps the more risk in another. The safest type of farming is probably still the well-diversified small farm, not having all your eggs in one basket. But over the last century the US moved away from those farms, a trend which is continuing in this century, as witness the results of planting flexibility.
"Farm Credit lenders in 15 states have received words of caution about the potential for excess risks shouldered by their biggest grain customers. ‘The 5,000 to 15,000-acre commercial grain farmer is emerging as a major customer from Arkansas to North Dakota,’ Ross Anderson, senior vice president and chief credit officer for St. Paul-based AgriBank told DTN in an interview last week."The idea is these operations are mostly rented land, so they've got a lot of leverage and are therefore assuming a lot of risk.
Risk on the farm interests me. There have been lots of innovations over the years to reduce risk: vertical integration in poultry, eggs, and pigs; futures; contract farming for popcorn and seed corn, crop insurance, disaster payment programs, production adjustment and marketing quota programs, etc. But farming evolves; the less risk in one area perhaps the more risk in another. The safest type of farming is probably still the well-diversified small farm, not having all your eggs in one basket. But over the last century the US moved away from those farms, a trend which is continuing in this century, as witness the results of planting flexibility.
Thursday, August 04, 2011
MIDAS Takes a Hit?
In the Farm Policy interview with Rep. Peterson, he says, with regards to the Deficit Control Act process:
"It could impact the effort that we’ve got underway to modernize the computer
system, all of which, in a way, affects producers"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)