Blogging on bureaucracy, organizations, USDA, agriculture programs, American history, the food movement, and other interests. Often contrarian, usually optimistic, sometimes didactic, occasionally funny, rarely wrong, always a nitpicker.
Tuesday, March 01, 2011
How Great We Are
Apparently, in addition to being the, or one of the, wealthiest county in the country, we also are healthy, according to this piece in the Reston Patch. The discussion is actually based on Congressional districts, not counties, but it's much the same. Joe Moran's district includes the Dems closer to the Potomac as well as Reston. According to the map, I should have a few more good years before I kick the bucket, which is nice to know.
Extension.org Goes Piggy
The RSS feed at extension.org has been going wild over the past few days; I'd guess 2-300 posts on hogs, mostly in a QandA format. Here's their answer to the question:
The same reasons can be used for the increase in average size of farms for many crops.
Why have pork production units become larger and the industry become more vertically integrated?
from eXtension by Contributors
Economies of size resulting in higher profits ? through purchasing inputs cheaper and reducing marketing risk (through contractts), more efficient use of resources, greater access to capital, specialization of labor.The same reasons can be used for the increase in average size of farms for many crops.
Monday, February 28, 2011
Farm Programs Leave a Twisting Trail
Over the years farm programs have left their mark in many unexpected places. For example, the price support programs in the 1950's accumulated a big pile of surplus commodities, much of which were sent overseas under the PL480 program. Under part of the program, instead of being donated commodities were sold for the local currency, such as rupees. The accumulated rupees built up in US government accounts, and were used for various purposes, including one described in this Chapati Mystery post. accumulating research materials.
RD Takes a Hit
Rural Development loses $29 million in broadband funds in the 2-week Republican/Democrat budget deal. What's worse is the implicit criticism from both sides of the agency's capabilities.
Funny Paragraph of Feb 28
Megan McArdle scores, in an aside in her generally skeptical post about the Rolling Stone article on the military psy-ops in Afghanistan directed towards Congress:
[On a side note: really? Someone in the military thought they needed secret psychological techniques to wrest more money for the military from John McCain? This is like embarking on a course of anabolic steroids in order to prepare for taking candy from a baby. But I digress.]
Sunday, February 27, 2011
UK Versus US Government
Don't remember to whom I owe a hat tip, but this provides an overview of how social policy is administered in the UK. A couple excerpts:
Local authorities are forbidden by law to do anything which is not expressly permitted by Parliament; local authorities which want to undertake any special initative need to promote a private Act of ParliamentCompare this to our federal system and we see once again how weak our government really is.
Despite the existence of a "council tax", local government has very limited discretion in its ability to raise money, and it is not permitted to exceed central government limits. Loans cannot be taken without express sanction. Central governments can make the availability of grants conditional on compliance with their policy.
Saturday, February 26, 2011
How Do You Know a Blogger Is Far Gone
When he writes something like this:
"I CAN’T STOP MYSELF: I subscribe to all the NASS California Crop Reports. I love these, mostly because they read like poetry.His real reason is the eminently logical one: statistics gives him a basis in reality, unlike the ephemera of the media. And who is he: a very good blogger on water issues in California, water which grows much of our fruits and vegetables.
USDA IT a Big Loser
According to this post at Gov Loop, the Obama administration's drive to consolidate federal data centers has one of its biggest targets in USDA, going from 46 data centers now to 5 in the future. (Only DHS has a bigger percentage drop.) The large number of data centers is a reflection of the decentralized nature of the department, which I've referred to in the past. The history of USDA is the development of individual agencies, each doing business its own way, and each resisting efforts by the departmental offices to consolidate.
When I joined ASCS, we had data processing centers in New Orleans, Kansas City, and Minneapolis. In the 70's the department took over the mainframes and the Minneapolis office was closed. But today, FSA uses centers in New Orleans, Kansas City, and St. Louis, having picked up the latter from the 1994 reorg with FmHA. I say "uses", because the centers are run by the department, though last I knew FSA had programmers in both KC and St. Louis. Congresspeople tend to resist closures, so whether the new Tea Partiers can overcome that chauvinism and the Obama administration can enforce its ideas will be interesting.
When I joined ASCS, we had data processing centers in New Orleans, Kansas City, and Minneapolis. In the 70's the department took over the mainframes and the Minneapolis office was closed. But today, FSA uses centers in New Orleans, Kansas City, and St. Louis, having picked up the latter from the 1994 reorg with FmHA. I say "uses", because the centers are run by the department, though last I knew FSA had programmers in both KC and St. Louis. Congresspeople tend to resist closures, so whether the new Tea Partiers can overcome that chauvinism and the Obama administration can enforce its ideas will be interesting.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Announcement on Women/Hispanic Claims of Discrimination
Vilsack announcement. Ironically, Firefox tells me the http://www.farmersclaims.gov site is untrusted. The link is now working.
Big Versus Small Farmers
Even in the UK there's tension between big farmers and small farmers. See this post from Musings of a Stonehead on the position, as he sees it, of the National Farmers Union in the UK. (Also see the sunset photos and the Victor Hugo poetry of the preceding post.)
It's the old story: if government regulations apply equally to everyone, the burden is greater for the small producers and therefore the big guys get a competitive advantage. If they don't apply at all, the little guys get the advantage.
It's the old story: if government regulations apply equally to everyone, the burden is greater for the small producers and therefore the big guys get a competitive advantage. If they don't apply at all, the little guys get the advantage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)