- Drama. We'll go from "no drama, Obama" to the drama king himself. Lots of t.oing and froing, changes of direction, suspense over decisions. I expect this because Trump himself doesn't seem to have firm beliefs in a lot of areas, because he's new to government, and because likely many of his appointees will be new. Compare this to Obama, whose big four appointees (State, DOD, Justice, and Treasury) were all old hands, with Clinton being the only one new to her responsibilities.
- Scandal. Despite the Republicans best efforts, Obama didn't have significant scandals. Trump is likely to. Think of Reagan: Interior, HUD, and Iran-contra spring to mind very readily. That's partly the same factors as for drama, but it's also appointing true believers who are more likely to follow their beliefs across the lines of ethics and legality.
- Economy growth or inflation. I can go a couple ways here: I believe Trump is inheriting a good economy, one which likely would continue to improve. So maybe he gets really lucky and has four solid years of growth despite himself (i.e., he doesn't carry out his promises). Alternatively, he carries out promises which results in inflation and rocky economics by disrupting trade, increasing inflationary pressures, promoting inefficiencies in the economy.
Sunday, November 27, 2016
The Trump Administration: Drama
Since I failed to predict Trump's win, why not predict what I expect from the administration? Basically, I'm relying quite a bit on the Reagan history here: