": Are there discussions regarding allowing NRCS to edit our CLU layer?I'll suppress some emotions here by making a couple points:
A: Brad Pfaff: Yes those discussions are happening to have NRCS edit the CLU and SCIMS. Darren Ash: They are looking at the impact it could have allowing other agencies to have that type of access. The goal is to have agencies be able to share information since we have common customers, but they are looking for an appropriate way to administer this."
- the "Common" in the CLU refers to the idea it would be shared between FSA and NRCS. I've a vague memory that we made some compromises or changes in the business rules for it in order to support NRCS data. Essentially it's the lowest common denominator between ASCS acreage data and NRCS.
- the dream of enabling one change to update both ASCS and SCS databases for name and address and land data dates back to the late 1980's, as a result of the impact of the sodbuster/swampbuster rules in the 1986 farm bill. So thirty years later we're still struggling with the issue.
- as a liberal, I usually support government programs, but sometimes I wonder how capable we bureaucrats really are. (Of course, I quickly turn to blaming Congress for many of the failures. :=))